發(fā)布時間：2018-04-20 05:29

  本文選題：胡塞爾 + 現(xiàn)象學(xué)��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：一般認(rèn)為，胡塞爾現(xiàn)象學(xué)和整個現(xiàn)象學(xué)運(yùn)動的創(chuàng)立是以《邏輯研究》一、二卷的發(fā)表(1900—1901年)為標(biāo)志。其后的一百年來，胡塞爾的現(xiàn)象學(xué)思想影響了整個西方思想界的走向，，其在與各種不同傳統(tǒng)思想碰撞中，展現(xiàn)出了巨大的活力。但這不并是說，現(xiàn)象學(xué)思想對我們已經(jīng)是純?nèi)蛔悦鞯牧�。恰恰相反，現(xiàn)象學(xué)對我們而言依然是那些最難理解的西方思想中的一支。尤其是當(dāng)人們把胡塞爾的現(xiàn)象學(xué)思想帶入到美學(xué)的研究領(lǐng)域中，就會發(fā)現(xiàn)，現(xiàn)象學(xué)美學(xué)的提法雖然已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)在了現(xiàn)象學(xué)產(chǎn)生的最初年頭里，但直到今天，在理解現(xiàn)象學(xué)美學(xué)這個問題上仍然存在著重大分歧。為何同時受惠于胡塞爾的現(xiàn)象學(xué)，產(chǎn)生出的美學(xué)思想差異會如此巨大?茵伽登、海德格爾等到底在什么地方受惠于胡塞爾現(xiàn)象學(xué)?他們是如何繼承和批判胡塞爾思想的?這都是本文所要討論的問題，本文立足于胡塞爾三本基本著作《邏輯研究》、《內(nèi)時間意識現(xiàn)象學(xué)》、《經(jīng)驗(yàn)與判斷》，分別討論意向性、視域和生活世界這三個胡塞爾思想的基本部分以及茵伽登、海德格爾和伽達(dá)默爾對其繼承和批判。 前言的第一部分對胡塞爾的生平和其學(xué)術(shù)思想做一簡要介紹，以便使讀者對胡塞爾本人有一個比較多面地了解。第二部分主要是討論在胡塞爾現(xiàn)象學(xué)這個問題上，人們產(chǎn)生多樣化理解的幾種可能原因。 第一章主要討論美學(xué)研究的困境以及胡塞爾現(xiàn)象學(xué)對美學(xué)研究可能帶來的影響。 第二章主要討論意向性理論的基本內(nèi)容以及茵伽登在美學(xué)領(lǐng)域?qū)ζ涞陌l(fā)展。 第三部分主要討論由內(nèi)時間意識所引出的視域理論以及這種視域理論對伽達(dá)默爾的解釋學(xué)產(chǎn)生的重要影響。 第四部分主要討論胡塞爾后期生活世界理論以及其與海德格爾藝術(shù)作品論的相通之處。
[Abstract]:It is generally believed that the foundation of Husserl's phenomenology and the whole phenomenological movement was marked by the publication of volumes I and II (1900-1901). In the next hundred years Husserl's phenomenological thought influenced the trend of the whole western ideological circle and showed great vitality in the collision with various traditional thoughts. But this does not mean that phenomenological ideas are self-evident to us. On the contrary, phenomenology is still one of the most difficult Western ideas to understand. Especially when people bring Husserl's phenomenological thought into the field of aesthetic research, we will find that although the formulation of phenomenological aesthetics has already appeared in the initial years of phenomenology, it is still today. There are still major differences in understanding phenomenological aesthetics. Why, at the same time, from Husserl's phenomenology, the difference in aesthetic thought is so great? Where did Ingadden and Heidegger benefit from Husserl's phenomenology? How did they inherit and criticize Husserl's thought? This paper is based on three basic works of Husserl, "Logic Research", "Phenomenology of Internal time consciousness", "experience and judgment", and discusses intentionality, respectively. The three basic parts of Husserl's thought, the horizon and the world of life, are inherited and criticized by Ingadden, Heidegger and Gadamer. The first part of the preface gives a brief introduction to Husserl's life and his academic thought in order to make readers have a better understanding of Husserl himself. The second part mainly discusses several possible causes of diverse understanding in Husserl's phenomenology. The first chapter mainly discusses the dilemma of aesthetic research and the possible influence of Husserl's phenomenology on aesthetic research. The second chapter mainly discusses the basic content of intentionality theory and the development of Ingadden in the field of aesthetics. The third part mainly discusses the theory of horizon derived from internal time consciousness and its important influence on Gadamer's hermeneutics. The fourth part mainly discusses Husserl's later life world theory and its similarities with Heidegger's works of art.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：B83-09

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 唐曉嵐;修梅艷;;詩歌點(diǎn)題在景觀敘事中的設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐——關(guān)于新城區(qū)道路植物景觀設(shè)計(jì)的探討[J];林業(yè)科技開發(fā);2010年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王立杰;現(xiàn)象學(xué)直觀及其對文學(xué)本體論研究的啟示與意義[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：1776459