本文選題：席勒　切入點(diǎn)：王國(guó)維　出處：《河南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今世界已步入全球化時(shí)代，這必然造成中西文化的交流與碰撞。這種現(xiàn)象也引起了美學(xué)領(lǐng)域發(fā)生了深刻地變化。這必然導(dǎo)致不同美學(xué)體系之間的多元并存及其思想的相互吸收與創(chuàng)新。在此時(shí)代背景下，對(duì)席勒和王國(guó)維的美育思想比較研究就彰顯了其必要性。西方偉大的美育思想家席勒，把美育的作用和地位提到了前所未有的高度，他的美育思想影響著全世界；而王國(guó)維不管是在美育理論的廣度還是深度上，都可以垂范后人。二者的美育思想，在美育背景、美育途徑、美育目標(biāo)、美育的現(xiàn)實(shí)結(jié)果等方面既有相同之處，同時(shí)也存有很大差異。本文著重就這些方面進(jìn)行了深入系統(tǒng)地分析與比較。 席勒和王國(guó)維面對(duì)時(shí)代困境極力尋找解決問(wèn)題的出路，他們不約而同地都選擇了美育而不是尋求政治手段來(lái)對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)和人性墮落進(jìn)行救贖。在他們美育思想的構(gòu)想中，其美育思想也出現(xiàn)了同異交錯(cuò)的特點(diǎn)。在美育思想背景方面：本文著重就美育思想形成的社會(huì)歷史背景進(jìn)行了深入地論述，突出席勒和王國(guó)維救贖現(xiàn)實(shí)的目的。同時(shí)，席勒和王國(guó)維的美育思想都深受康德哲學(xué)與美學(xué)的影響，都蘊(yùn)含著現(xiàn)代性的訴求。他們的美育觀點(diǎn)大多是以康德的理論為依據(jù)，本文就理論的繼承與創(chuàng)新方面進(jìn)行分析與闡釋。就現(xiàn)代性訴求方面而言，席勒以獨(dú)特的視角對(duì)由于近代工業(yè)文明的發(fā)展造成的異化現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行控訴與批判，開啟了對(duì)資本主義現(xiàn)代性進(jìn)行審美批判的先河。王國(guó)維對(duì)德國(guó)美學(xué)思想的引進(jìn)與傳播和注重人性啟蒙問(wèn)題，使中國(guó)的審美思想發(fā)生了現(xiàn)代性的轉(zhuǎn)換。在美育思想內(nèi)容方面的比較：著重就美育思想建構(gòu)的出發(fā)點(diǎn)、途徑、目標(biāo)及最終結(jié)果進(jìn)行了比較分析，，從而明晰中西美育理論在發(fā)展過(guò)程中交融與碰撞的軌跡，找出二者美育的共同性與差異性，以便更好地指導(dǎo)我們當(dāng)代的美育建設(shè)。 之后，就美育思想比較進(jìn)行反思，使我們明確當(dāng)今人們的生存困境，明晰了美育比較的意義。伴隨著社會(huì)的進(jìn)步和科技的快速發(fā)展，人們已將自己肢解成為千瘡百孔的人，人、社會(huì)和教育的異化現(xiàn)象比席勒、王國(guó)維時(shí)代更突出。在這個(gè)任工具理性宰割的世界里，人被異化成整體中一個(gè)個(gè)孤零零的碎片。教育為了滿足社會(huì)的需要，也偏離了培養(yǎng)健全人格的軌道。面對(duì)當(dāng)今人類的生存困境和人性的分裂與扭曲，我們也越來(lái)越意識(shí)到美育的重要性。所以，通過(guò)對(duì)席勒和王國(guó)維美育思想的比較，我們對(duì)和諧與自由的盡善盡美的理想境界充滿了向往。毋庸置疑，在當(dāng)今社會(huì)，他們的美育思想仍有其不可忽視的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。
[Abstract]:The world has entered an era of globalization. This will inevitably lead to the exchange and collision of Chinese and Western cultures, which has also caused profound changes in the field of aesthetics, which will inevitably lead to the coexistence of pluralism among different aesthetic systems and the mutual absorption and innovation of their ideas. The comparative study of Schiller's and Wang Guowei's aesthetic education thought shows its necessity. Schiller, a great western aesthetic education thinker, raised the role and status of aesthetic education to an unprecedented height, and his aesthetic education thought influenced the whole world. And Wang Guowei, whether in the breadth or depth of aesthetic education theory, can set a standard for later generations. Their aesthetic education ideas have some similarities in aesthetic education background, aesthetic education approaches, aesthetic education goals, and the realistic results of aesthetic education, and so on. At the same time, there are also great differences. This paper focuses on the in-depth and systematic analysis and comparison of these aspects. Faced with the predicament of the times, Schiller and Wang Guowei tried their best to find a solution to the problem. They all chose aesthetic education instead of political means to redeem the reality and the depravity of human nature. In the aspect of aesthetic education ideological background, this paper focuses on the social and historical background of aesthetic education thought formation, highlighting the purpose of the redeeming reality of Schiller and Wang Guowei. Both Schiller and Wang Guowei's aesthetic education thoughts are deeply influenced by Kant's philosophy and aesthetics and contain the demands of modernity. Most of their aesthetic education views are based on Kant's theory. This paper analyzes and explains the inheritance and innovation of theory. In terms of the demands of modernity, Schiller accuses and criticizes the alienation phenomenon caused by the development of modern industrial civilization from a unique angle of view. Wang Guowei's introduction and dissemination of German aesthetic thought and his attention to the enlightenment of human nature, The comparison in the content of aesthetic education thought: the starting point, the way, the goal and the final result of the aesthetic education thought construction. In order to better guide our contemporary aesthetic education construction, we can make clear the track of blending and collision between Chinese and Western aesthetic education theory in the process of development, and find out the commonality and difference between them in order to guide our contemporary aesthetic education construction. After that, we reflect on the comparison of aesthetic education thoughts, so that we can make clear the plight of people's existence and the significance of aesthetic education comparison. With the progress of society and the rapid development of science and technology, people have dismembered themselves into people with numerous problems. The alienation of man, society and education is more prominent than that of Schiller and Wang Guowei. In this world of rational manipulation, people are alienated into isolated fragments of the whole. Education is to meet the needs of society. In the face of the plight of human existence and the division and distortion of human nature, we are becoming more and more aware of the importance of aesthetic education. Therefore, through the comparison of Schiller's and Wang Guowei's thoughts on aesthetic education, We are full of yearning for the perfect ideal state of harmony and freedom.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：B83-0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 盧俊;審美的功用與人類的自我拯救──評(píng)席勒的美育思想及其現(xiàn)代意義[J];寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1995年04期

2 楊家友;;從“完整的人”到“全能的神”——席勒的宗教和美育思想解讀[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

3 方紅梅;;關(guān)于完整人與趣味人的構(gòu)想——席勒與梁?jiǎn)⒊烙枷胫容^[J];湖南師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

4 湛玉釗;席勒美育思想與當(dāng)前人文教育[J];涪陵師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

5 劉繼平;;席勒美育思想之現(xiàn)實(shí)性思考[J];貴陽(yáng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

6 張玉能;席勒論藝術(shù)的人類學(xué)根源[J];三峽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期

7 王東;吳效剛;;席勒美育思想的現(xiàn)代性意義[J];江海學(xué)刊;2006年06期

8 俞曉霞;;論王國(guó)維美育思想的現(xiàn)代性價(jià)值[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年01期

9 李冬梅;;素質(zhì)教育中一個(gè)不容忽視的環(huán)節(jié)——淺談基礎(chǔ)教育中的美育的實(shí)施[J];科學(xué)大眾;2007年02期

10 李欣人;人的自由與審美教育——席勒美育思想探析[J];南開學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 閆翠靜;席勒的美學(xué)思想及其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義[D];山東師范大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 宋明媛;席勒美育思想與孔子美育思想比較[D];西北大學(xué);2011年

2 尚蓮霞;王國(guó)維美育思想及其現(xiàn)代意義[D];南京師范大學(xué);2003年

3 謝許航;席勒美育思想的現(xiàn)代性批判[D];華南師范大學(xué);2005年

4 趙新雅;探究現(xiàn)代性“美育”思想的中國(guó)化過(guò)程[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年

5 趙曉冬;王國(guó)維美育思想的精神內(nèi)核及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值[D];貴州大學(xué);2006年

6 安佰鴻;席勒的自由觀念和美育思想[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

7 汪文忠;王國(guó)維美學(xué)思想的現(xiàn)代詮釋[D];安徽大學(xué);2006年

8 劉曉峰;王國(guó)維與蔡元培美育思想比較研究[D];西南大學(xué);2007年

9 潘吉英;無(wú)用之用—王國(guó)維美育思想述評(píng)[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

10 施勤;席勒美育思想研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1585530