本文選題：徐悲鴻 + 現(xiàn)代性　； 參考：《美術研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：本文主題是現(xiàn)代性視角的徐悲鴻研究。1、現(xiàn)代性問題紛繁復雜,本文著重現(xiàn)代性理解之一的馬克斯韋伯路線,并以列奧·斯特勞斯的《現(xiàn)代性的三次浪潮》為切入點。但西方現(xiàn)代性的開啟與成果早已不僅僅只屬于西方,而屬于全世界人民共同的財富�，F(xiàn)代性并不等于西方化。"五四"運動是中國現(xiàn)代性啟蒙的真正開篇和時代強音。反思的"五四"是中國現(xiàn)代性重臨的起點和永恒的目標。2、徐悲鴻是"五四"新文化運動的一員。他選擇并為之奮斗一生的寫實主義的終極原因即是"五四"精神洗禮的自由民主與科學之追求,晚清及至"五四"精神的現(xiàn)代性啟蒙是徐悲鴻寫實主義的思想史基礎。3、本文對徐悲鴻的主張近一百年來大約遭到的四方面批評、質疑進行了"現(xiàn)代性"問題糾纏的學理性清理,和現(xiàn)代藝術思想史的剖析。4、以公共精神的關懷者闡釋也改造世界意義是畫家徐悲鴻的現(xiàn)代人文知識分子的角色認定,并極富行動體現(xiàn)。5、徐悲鴻畢生堅持文化建設、保藏和文化輸出,他的亞洲足跡和歐洲巡展都在避免民族自卑而不成其為"被看"的"他者"形象,改寫著中國文化在世界的弱勢乃至失聲狀態(tài)。堅持民族文化的身份認同,努力與第一世界建設平等對話關系,這使得徐悲鴻極富后殖民時代的當代意義。
[Abstract]:The theme of this paper is the study of Xu Beihong from the perspective of modernity. The problem of modernity is complicated. This paper focuses on Marx, one of the understanding of modernity. Weber line, and with Leo Strauss's "three waves of modernity" as the starting point. However, the opening and achievement of western modernity have long belonged to the common wealth of people all over the world. Modernity does not mean westernization. " The May fourth Movement is the real opening of the Enlightenment of modernity in China and the strong tone of the times. "May 4th" is the starting point and eternal target of Chinese modernity. Xu Beihong is a member of "May 4th" New Culture Movement. The ultimate reason for the realism he chose and fought for all his life was the pursuit of freedom, democracy and science in the baptism of the May 4th spirit. The modernity enlightenment of the spirit of the late Qing Dynasty and the May 4th Movement was the foundation of the ideological history of Xu Beihong realism. This paper, in view of the four aspects of criticism about Xu Beihong's proposition in the past 100 years, questioned the academic rationality of the entanglement of "modernity". And the analysis of the history of modern art ideology. 4. The interpretation of the world significance by the soliciters of public spirit is the role of modern humanistic intellectuals of the painter Xu Beihong, and it is extremely rich in action. Xu Beihong insists on cultural construction all his life. Preservation and cultural export, his Asian footprint and European tour both avoid the national inferiority complex and become the "other" image, rewriting the weak and even silent state of Chinese culture in the world. Adhering to the identity of national culture and striving to establish an equal dialogue relationship with the first world makes Xu Beihong extremely rich in the contemporary significance of the post-colonial era.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學藝術學院;徐悲鴻藝術研究院;徐悲鴻藝術研究院學術部;
【分類號】：J203

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 朱平;;實驗水墨對中國“現(xiàn)代性”的藝術表征[J];美術界;2013年06期

2 殷雙喜;城市·水墨·現(xiàn)代性[J];美術研究;2001年02期

3 劉靜軒;;現(xiàn)代性視閾中的時裝流行趨勢研究[J];美術大觀;2012年10期

4 榮劍;;重返現(xiàn)代——社會轉型時代的藝術轉型[J];美術研究;2007年02期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 安鵬飛;設計藝術中的現(xiàn)代性思考[D];天津工業(yè)大學;2008年

2 袁小慧;從現(xiàn)代流行女裝文化看女性的現(xiàn)代性[D];陜西師范大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1976142