本文關(guān)鍵詞： 羅牧 交游 西江派 處士 身份　出處：《江西師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：羅牧和八大山人處于同一時期，從客觀上來說都同為明代遺民。但兩人對于世事的態(tài)度卻截然不同。八大身為王孫后裔，改朝換代這件事對于他而言是身份的轉(zhuǎn)換倒置，而處在深山之中的年輕羅牧，王朝的更替對其思想上卻不存在太大的沖擊。羅牧在明末清初江南文人中具有相當(dāng)?shù)牡湫托酝瑫r又有自己的特殊性，他帶著遺民處士的身份，卻又與清朝巡撫宋犖及其他仕清官員交往并關(guān)系密切。而羅牧在這之間所扮演的處士角色，是一座最理想的、用以緩和朝廷與遺民之間嫌隙的橋梁，亦為隨后西江派的出現(xiàn)奠定了堅實的基礎(chǔ)。 緒論部分簡要介紹了研究的意義、現(xiàn)狀、可據(jù)資料以及研究設(shè)想，并就文章的展開提出了一個大的方向。 全文大致可分為三個部分。 第一部分總體論述了羅牧特殊的處士身份及生活狀況，并對部分相關(guān)概念做了界定，為隨后文章的論述和探究進行了鋪墊。 第二部分將視角重點放在了羅牧成年之后的交游和交友上。分析羅牧對于不同交往對象的交往模式，竭力真實展現(xiàn)羅牧在不同身份中的自如轉(zhuǎn)換以及他特殊的橋梁作用。 第三部分主要論述羅牧與當(dāng)時文人之間的藝術(shù)活動，選取部分作品進行風(fēng)格分析，綜合考量西江派在當(dāng)時所體現(xiàn)出的復(fù)雜性和可能存在的問題。 文章探究羅牧這一集多面性和特殊性為一體的文人形象，并重新構(gòu)建其在江西畫壇的真實地位，揭示了羅牧對地域史、藝術(shù)史、文化史的意義和對后世產(chǎn)生的影響。本文期望通過探究羅牧在當(dāng)時的生活和交往模式，能得以窺見清初江西文人的精神世界和他們的真實生活。
[Abstract]:Luo Mu and the eight great mountain people are in the same period, objectively speaking, both of them are survivors of the Ming Dynasty. But the attitude of the two people toward the world is quite different. As a descendant of Wang and Sun, the eight great powers, as descendants of Wang Sun, changed the dynasty and changed the dynasty. This incident is an inversion of his identity. But young Luomu, who was in the deep mountains, did not have a great impact on his ideology by the change of dynasty. Luomu was quite typical and had his own particularity among the literati in the south of the Yangtze River in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties. But he also had close relations with Song Luo, the governor of the Qing Dynasty, and other officials of the Qing Dynasty. The role of Luo Mu in this connection was an ideal bridge to ease the gap between the court and the bereaved. It also laid a solid foundation for the emergence of Xijiang School. The introduction briefly introduces the significance of the research, the present situation, according to the data and research ideas, and puts forward a major direction for the development of the article. The full text can be roughly divided into three parts. The first part discusses the special status and living conditions of Luo Mu, defines some related concepts, and paves the way for the discussion and exploration of the following article. In the second part, the author focuses on the communication and friendship of Luo Mu after his adulthood, analyzes his communication mode for different objects of communication, and tries his best to show his free transformation in different identities and his special bridge function. The third part mainly discusses the artistic activities between Luo Mu and the literati at that time, selects some works to carry on the style analysis, synthetically considers the complexity and the possible question which the Xijiang school manifests at that time. The article probes into Luomu, a literati image with multi-facets and particularities, and reconstructs his true position in Jiangxi painting world, and reveals Luo Mu's influence on regional history and art history. The significance of cultural history and its influence on later generations. This paper hopes to find out the spiritual world and the real life of Jiangxi literati in the early Qing Dynasty by exploring the life and communication mode of Luo Mu at that time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：J209.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳超;;清初士子的“明哲保身”論——以朱彝尊為中心[J];合肥師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期

2 魏泉;康熙年間“宣南”的士人交游[J];北京社會科學(xué);2004年04期

3 王文榮;;明清江南文化家族結(jié)社論略——以蘇、松、常、鎮(zhèn)四府為考察中心[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年01期

4 陳書良;清初揚州文人集團的商業(yè)活動敘略[J];湖南商學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年05期

5 趙逵夫;;孫枝蔚的一篇佚文與清初寓居江南的秦地詩人[J];漢中師院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1986年03期

6 孔定芳;;論清圣祖的遺民策略——以“博學(xué)鴻儒科”為考察中心[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2006年01期

7 徐永斌;;明清時期江南文人治生及其“變異”現(xiàn)象[J];江海學(xué)刊;2010年04期

8 章建文;;論明末崇禎年間皖江散文思想的轉(zhuǎn)變與影響[J];江海學(xué)刊;2010年04期

9 李嬋娟;;魏禧江西交游考[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期

10 宮泉久;;論清初山左詩人的結(jié)社交游[J];理論學(xué)刊;2008年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳增禮;清初江南遺民生存境況研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1507076