新聞視角的框定:《紐約時報》和《文匯報》對阿爾茨海默病的新聞報道的社會語言學分析
發(fā)布時間:2021-09-24 11:31
在重大社會問題上新聞話語對于公眾認知和態(tài)度的影響力早已被許多學者所探討研究。在健康問題方面,新聞媒介是大眾了解重大流行疾病的相關信息的主要渠道。公眾對于重大疾病的認知、理解和判斷通常由媒體話語背后所反映的權力關系和社會意識形態(tài)所決定。因此,重大疾病不僅僅是病理癥狀,也是被構建出的社會現象。阿爾茨海默病是癡呆癥中最常見的一種,高發(fā)于老年人群體,會逐步破壞患者的認知行動能力,故在中國也被稱為“老年癡呆”。隨著全球媒體對于該疾病的關注度不斷增加,探究新聞話語中折所射出的阿爾茨海默病的社會意義對于了解媒體話語與社會意識形態(tài)的互動聯系有著積極的意義。盡管公眾對阿爾茨海默病的關注度正逐步上升,對于該疾病的媒體報道研究并未像其他重大疾病如乳腺癌和肥胖癥那樣引起足夠的學術關注。在總結前人相關研究的基礎上,本文采用了新聞框架分析理論來比較分析中美兩份極具影響力的報紙——《紐約時報》和《文匯報》兩年間以阿爾茨海默病為主題的新聞報道中的話語策略和現實構建。新聞框架分析研究新聞視角的框定,即報道對象被選擇和凸顯的方面,從而構建媒體對于該事物特定的定義判斷、因果分析、道德評價和解決方案;該理論能夠有效解讀本文所...
【文章來源】:復旦大學上海市 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校
【文章頁數】:77 頁
【學位級別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research objectives
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 News Discourse and Ideology
2.2 News Framing
2.3 Alzheimer's Disease and Related Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework and Methodology
3.1 Theoretical Framework
3.2 Methodology
Chapter Four Results
4.1 News Headlines
4.1.1 Drug trial and treatment frame foregrounding confrontation in The New York Times
4.1.2 Risk avoiding frame foregrounding personal prevention in Wenhui Bao
4.2 Topic Categories Covered in AD News Reports
4.2.1 Episodic/thematic frames in the news
4.2.2 Dominance of biomedical topics with varying levels of technicality
4.2.3 Prevalence of personal prevention topic in Wenhui Bao
4.2.4 Policy topic in The New York Times
4.2.5 Personal story-the tale of two caregivers
4.3 News Sources Covered in AD News Reports
4.3.1 Dominance of professional sources:doctors, researchers and supporters
4.3.2 Marginalized voice of AD patients
4.3.3 Politicians as news sources in The New York Times and Wenhui Bao
Chapter Five Findings and Discussion
5.1 Findings
5.1.1 Different topicalization of news headlines
5.1.2 Dominance of biomedical discourse
5.1.3 Differences concerning episodic and thematic frames
5.1.4 Marginalized voice of AD patients
5.2 Discussion
Chapter Six Conclusion
References
Acknowledgements
【參考文獻】:
期刊論文
[1]紐約時報對釣魚島爭端報道的傾向性——從“框架理論”視角分析[J]. 黃蒙. 青年記者. 2013(06)
[2]從美國《國情咨文》(1972—2012)管窺美國對中國態(tài)度變遷[J]. 韓愈. 東南傳播. 2012(11)
[3]危機傳播中新聞框架使用情況的跨文化分析——以中美兩國食品危機后的紙媒報道為例[J]. 吳夢旎. 中國傳媒科技. 2012(08)
[4]意象思維與軀體化癥狀:疾病表達的文化心理學途徑[J]. 呂小康,汪新建. 心理學報. 2012(02)
[5]框架分析:一個亟待澄清的理論概念[J]. 陳陽. 國際新聞界. 2007(04)
[6]Theory of traditional Chinese medicine and therapeutic method of diseases[J]. Ai-Ping Lu Hong-Wei Jia Cheng Xiao Institute of Basic Theory,China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,ChinaQing-Ping Lu National Pharmaceutical Engineering Research Center,Nanchang 330077,Jiangxi Province,China. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004(13)
[7]論中醫(yī)模式與中醫(yī)疾病觀[J]. 郝麗莉,蘇晶,李欣育. 中醫(yī)藥學報. 1998(06)
本文編號:3407680
【文章來源】:復旦大學上海市 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校
【文章頁數】:77 頁
【學位級別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research objectives
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 News Discourse and Ideology
2.2 News Framing
2.3 Alzheimer's Disease and Related Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework and Methodology
3.1 Theoretical Framework
3.2 Methodology
Chapter Four Results
4.1 News Headlines
4.1.1 Drug trial and treatment frame foregrounding confrontation in The New York Times
4.1.2 Risk avoiding frame foregrounding personal prevention in Wenhui Bao
4.2 Topic Categories Covered in AD News Reports
4.2.1 Episodic/thematic frames in the news
4.2.2 Dominance of biomedical topics with varying levels of technicality
4.2.3 Prevalence of personal prevention topic in Wenhui Bao
4.2.4 Policy topic in The New York Times
4.2.5 Personal story-the tale of two caregivers
4.3 News Sources Covered in AD News Reports
4.3.1 Dominance of professional sources:doctors, researchers and supporters
4.3.2 Marginalized voice of AD patients
4.3.3 Politicians as news sources in The New York Times and Wenhui Bao
Chapter Five Findings and Discussion
5.1 Findings
5.1.1 Different topicalization of news headlines
5.1.2 Dominance of biomedical discourse
5.1.3 Differences concerning episodic and thematic frames
5.1.4 Marginalized voice of AD patients
5.2 Discussion
Chapter Six Conclusion
References
Acknowledgements
【參考文獻】:
期刊論文
[1]紐約時報對釣魚島爭端報道的傾向性——從“框架理論”視角分析[J]. 黃蒙. 青年記者. 2013(06)
[2]從美國《國情咨文》(1972—2012)管窺美國對中國態(tài)度變遷[J]. 韓愈. 東南傳播. 2012(11)
[3]危機傳播中新聞框架使用情況的跨文化分析——以中美兩國食品危機后的紙媒報道為例[J]. 吳夢旎. 中國傳媒科技. 2012(08)
[4]意象思維與軀體化癥狀:疾病表達的文化心理學途徑[J]. 呂小康,汪新建. 心理學報. 2012(02)
[5]框架分析:一個亟待澄清的理論概念[J]. 陳陽. 國際新聞界. 2007(04)
[6]Theory of traditional Chinese medicine and therapeutic method of diseases[J]. Ai-Ping Lu Hong-Wei Jia Cheng Xiao Institute of Basic Theory,China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,ChinaQing-Ping Lu National Pharmaceutical Engineering Research Center,Nanchang 330077,Jiangxi Province,China. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004(13)
[7]論中醫(yī)模式與中醫(yī)疾病觀[J]. 郝麗莉,蘇晶,李欣育. 中醫(yī)藥學報. 1998(06)
本文編號:3407680
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/3407680.html