規(guī)訓(xùn)權(quán)力通過層級(jí)監(jiān)視等手段來約束并馴順人的行為和思想,而空間是權(quán)力運(yùn)作的重要載體。作為司法審判的實(shí)踐場(chǎng)域,法庭是一種規(guī)訓(xùn)性機(jī)構(gòu),權(quán)力關(guān)系（包括規(guī)訓(xùn)權(quán)力）也體現(xiàn)在其空間結(jié)構(gòu)話語中。當(dāng)前的法庭話語研究揭示了以法官為中心的權(quán)力不平等在庭審言語交際諸多層面的體現(xiàn),而對(duì)于庭審語境中法官權(quán)力的制約因素尚缺乏深入的考察。本文擬從法庭的空間話語角度探討中國古代法庭中規(guī)訓(xùn)權(quán)力的空間結(jié)構(gòu)配置及其對(duì)法官話語權(quán)力的制約。結(jié)合福柯的“權(quán)力空間”學(xué)說,本文以系統(tǒng)功能符號(hào)學(xué)理論框架為分析工具,對(duì)河南內(nèi)鄉(xiāng)縣衙法庭中空間化的權(quán)力進(jìn)行深入的多模態(tài)話語分析。通過對(duì)法庭空間文本的元功能解讀,本文揭示了古代法庭中多模態(tài)符號(hào)體現(xiàn)的道德教化:視覺圖像（如屏風(fēng)彩繪）和文字文本（如楹聯(lián)文字）兩種模態(tài)相互闡釋,凸顯了中國傳統(tǒng)司法價(jià)值追求,在潛移默化中規(guī)訓(xùn)著法官的思想意識(shí)形態(tài)與審判行為�？臻g構(gòu)成上,古代法庭可被視為福柯式的全景敞式監(jiān)獄:相互延伸的空間文本在功能上擔(dān)當(dāng)了權(quán)力的眼睛,時(shí)刻監(jiān)視、規(guī)訓(xùn)著法官的司法行為,并促使法官在這種凝視性目光中加強(qiáng)自我約束。此外,本文對(duì)一則模擬古代法庭審判的視頻文本進(jìn)行話語分析,一定程度上佐證了此規(guī)訓(xùn)權(quán)力的確能... 

【文章來源】：南京理工大學(xué)江蘇省 211工程院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：85 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Significance
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 A Systemic Functional Semiotic Approach to Multimodal Discourse Analysis
        2.1.1 Multimodal discourse analysis
        2.1.2 Multimodal discourse analysis and Systemic Functional Linguistics
        2.1.3 Previous studies on MDA abroad
        2.1.4 Previous studies on MDA at home
    2.2 Previous Studies on Courtroom Power
        2.2.1 Studies on courtroom power abroad
        2.2.2 Studies on courtroom power at home
    2.3 Previous Studies on Traditional Chinese Courtroom
        2.3.1 Historical development and architecture evolution
        2.3.2 Architectural arts and cultural connotations
        2.3.3 Architectural features and power operation
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Foucauldian Power-space Theory
        3.1.1 Power and space
        3.1.2 Disciplinary power
    3.2 Metafunctions in Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics
        3.2.1 Ideational metafunction
        3.2.2 Interpersonal metafunction
        3.2.3 Textual metafunction
    3.3 Kress & Van Leeuwen's Visual Grammar
        3.3.1 Representational meaning
        3.3.2 Interactive meaning
        3.3.3 Compositional meaning
Chapter Four Research Methodology
    4.1 Research Questions
    4.2 Research Data
    4.3 Data Transcription
    4.4 Research Procedure
Chapter Five A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Spatialized Power onJudges in the Courtrooms of Neixiang Yamen
    5.1 Written Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges in Plaques and Couplets
        5.1.1 Plaques and couplets in and around the principal hall
        5.1.2 Plaques and couplets in and around the secondary hall
        5.1.3 Plaques and couplets in and around the tertiary hall
    5.2 Pictorial Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges in Paintings and ReliefSculptures
        5.2.1 Paintings in the principal hall
        5.2.2 Paintings in the secondary hall
        5.2.3 Relief sculptures at other sites
    5.3 Multi-dimensional Spatial Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges inCourtroom
        5.3.1 A panoptic power-restricting network in the principal hall
        5.3.2 A panoptic power-restricting network in the secondary hall
        5.3.3 A panoptic power-restricting network in the tertiary hall
    5.4 Spatialized Power in Action:Dramatized Courtroom Behaviors of the Judge in theIllustrative Video
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings of the Present Study
    6.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies
Acknowledgements
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
Appendix Ⅲ


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]法庭話語權(quán)力的空間配置與法官話語的非中心化——對(duì)內(nèi)鄉(xiāng)縣衙大堂法庭空間的多模態(tài)話語分析[J]. 張麗萍,丁天會(huì).  語言學(xué)研究. 2017(02)
[2]我國法院建筑的法文化分析[J]. 趙明勝.  西安建筑科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2015(06)
[3]法庭話語打斷現(xiàn)象與性別研究[J]. 廖美珍,龔進(jìn)軍.  當(dāng)代修辭學(xué). 2015(01)
[4]“規(guī)訓(xùn)”的司法與“被縛”的法官——對(duì)法官績效考核制度困境與誤區(qū)的深層解讀[J]. 李擁軍,傅愛竹.  法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2014(06)
[5]社會(huì)符號(hào)學(xué)視角下廣告語篇的多模態(tài)話語分析[J]. 張蔚.  東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2012(02)
[6]刑事審判法庭布置的法理分析[J]. 胡夏冰,陳春梅.  遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2011(06)
[7]動(dòng)態(tài)多模態(tài)話語的模態(tài)協(xié)同研究——以電視天氣預(yù)報(bào)多模態(tài)語篇為例[J]. 張德祿,袁艷艷.  山東外語教學(xué). 2011(05)
[8]情理法的正當(dāng)性:以“情”為核心的闡釋———以《名公書判清明集》為考察依據(jù)[J]. 崔明石.  吉林師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2011(02)
[9]琶洲展館的多模態(tài)話語分析——造型與功能的結(jié)合[J]. 李妙晴.  外語藝術(shù)教育研究. 2010(03)
[10]凡俗與神圣:解讀“明鏡高懸”的司法意義[J]. 徐忠明.  中國法學(xué). 2010(02)

博士論文
[1]庭審話語中的法官身份構(gòu)建[D]. 江玲.上海外國語大學(xué) 2012
[2]法庭審判話語的批評(píng)性分析[D]. 施光.南京師范大學(xué) 2008

碩士論文
[1]中國法庭審判的非言語傳播及其符號(hào)闡釋[D]. 葛恒.陜西師范大學(xué) 2016
[2]電影語篇《喜羊羊與灰太狼》的多模態(tài)話語分析[D]. 郭思斯.南京師范大學(xué) 2012
[3]中國文化的符號(hào)與象征的研究[D]. 高雪.山東大學(xué) 2010
[4]內(nèi)鄉(xiāng)縣衙建筑研究[D]. 栗曉文.河南大學(xué) 2009
[5]明清時(shí)期衙署建筑制度研究[D]. 牛淑杰.西安建筑科技大學(xué) 2003



本文編號(hào)：3139985