本研究的目的是對(duì)比英文版網(wǎng)絡(luò)報(bào)紙社論的特點(diǎn),以及庫爾德語讀者和中文讀者的反饋。用于語篇分析的語料庫由每個(gè)小組的20篇社論組成。本研究采用定量的方法,運(yùn)用描述性和推理性統(tǒng)計(jì)方法來描述新聞報(bào)道和讀者反饋。參加者包括60名庫爾德語母語者和中文母語者。本研究揭示了五個(gè)結(jié)果:首先,研究表明庫爾德社論在語言方面比中文社論更復(fù)雜,二者差異顯著(M=64.7030<104.5138);其次,研究的庫爾德社論和中文社論具有議論性質(zhì);再次,就研究目的而言,語料庫中沒有任何社論旨在娛樂讀者。中文社論僅實(shí)現(xiàn)了一個(gè)目標(biāo),而庫爾德社論傳達(dá)了多個(gè)目標(biāo);第四,庫爾德社論和中文社論兩者在在標(biāo)題類型和語法結(jié)構(gòu)上相似(M=2.00),它們的大部分標(biāo)題都是總結(jié)性陳述和句子結(jié)構(gòu)而不吸引人的標(biāo)題;最后,t檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果表明,與中國讀者相比,庫爾德語讀者對(duì)基于他們年齡、性別和受教育水的新聞?dòng)邢嗤挠^點(diǎn)(p000<.05)。研究結(jié)果有助于研究和EFL/EJP學(xué)生觀察庫爾德語和漢語在英語形式上的語言差異。這可以用來提高社論寫作的質(zhì)量從而改善讀者反饋。本研究的基礎(chǔ)為兩種語言的進(jìn)一步語言學(xué)研究提供了一個(gè)選擇,如漢語和庫爾德語。此外,... 

【文章來源】：華中師范大學(xué)湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：103 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Abbreviation terms
1 Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research Questions
    1.3 Research Significances
    1.4 Structure of the Thesis
2 Literature Review
    2.1 Related Study in China
    2.2 Related study in Kurdistan
    2.3 Related Study
    2.4 Related terms
        2.4.1 Discourse Analysis
        2.4.2 Contrastive Analysis
        2.4.3 Professional Writing
        2.4.4 Editorials
        2.4.5 Reporting Discourse
        2.4.6 Different Readers Perceive
3 Research Design
    3.1 Research objectives
    3.2 Research subjects
    3.3 Research procedure
        3.3.1 Corpus selection
        3.3.2 Selection of Newspapers
        3.3.3 Selection of Editorials
        3.3.4 Sample data collection
    3.4 Test Validity
4 Text Analysis on English electronic Newspaper Reporting
    4.1 Text analyses and results
    4.2 Length and Complexity of Linguistics Units
        4.2.1 Word Length
        4.2.2 Sentence
        4.2.3 Paragraph
        4.2.4 Preposition
        4.2.5 Connectives
        4.2.6 Pronouns
        4.2.7 Discussion and results of Complexity Linguistic units
    4.3 Editorial Title Type （headline） and Structure Analysis
    4.4 Solution Analysis
    4.5 Editorial Purpose Analysis
    4.6 Main Results of the contrast study
5 Readers' reaction Analysis on English Reporting electronic newspapers
    5.1 Chinese and Kurdish Readers' reaction
    5.2 Data Collection Procedures
    5.3 Instrument
    5.4 Results and Discussion
        5.4.1 The General Information
        5.4.2 Patterns and functions of reading
        5.4.3 Reader reaction of authorship
    5.5 Inferential Statistic
    5.6 The Difference between Chinese and Kurdish reaction of readers
6 Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings
    6.2 Implication for English Foreigner Learners
    6.3 Some suggestions for English Foreign Learners
    6.4 Limitation of the study
Bibliography
Acknowledgement
Appendixes



本文編號(hào)：2898127