【摘要】：長(zhǎng)沙方言屬于新湘方言，是湘語的代表，，在語音、語法等方面具有鮮明的地方色彩。本論文主要研究的是長(zhǎng)沙方言的完成體。長(zhǎng)沙方言的動(dòng)態(tài)助詞具有單用、復(fù)合和分離的特點(diǎn)。我們通過對(duì)其動(dòng)態(tài)助詞的細(xì)致考察，以求解決下列兩個(gè)核心問題：長(zhǎng)沙方言完成體中“咖”和“噠”與漢語完成體中“了”和“過”的比較。長(zhǎng)沙方言中的“咖”和“噠”的復(fù)合結(jié)構(gòu)“咖噠”與“咖…噠”的不同和限制條件。 針對(duì)上述第一個(gè)議題，即長(zhǎng)沙方言完成體和漢語完成體的比較，我們將主要關(guān)注“咖”和“噠”在語法上和語義上與漢語中“了”和“過”的對(duì)比，基于Lu(2010)對(duì)長(zhǎng)沙方言“咖”和“噠”的研究，我們通過進(jìn)一步的探討，發(fā)現(xiàn)“咖”表示序列，而“噠”不僅表示原因，還可表示序列和條件�！翱А焙汀皣}”在語義上并不是絕對(duì)不同的，相反它們有相同之處。 對(duì)本文第二個(gè)議題，我們將運(yùn)用Chomsky (1995)最簡(jiǎn)方案的特征核查理論來探討“咖”和“噠”的復(fù)合結(jié)構(gòu)“咖噠”與“咖…噠”的句法地位以及句法表現(xiàn)。另外，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)“咖噠”和“咖…噠”有各自的語法結(jié)構(gòu)，即“咖噠”是一起使用，而“咖…噠”被賓語分開。“咖噠”位于形容詞后時(shí)，在形容詞后不帶補(bǔ)語，而“咖…噠”通常要加上數(shù)量補(bǔ)語。表示完成的單音節(jié)詞可以和“咖噠”連用，而雙音節(jié)詞卻不行。通過比較“了1…了2”與長(zhǎng)沙方言中的“咖…噠”，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)它們?cè)诮Y(jié)構(gòu)和語義上都有著相似之處，但他們并不是完全相等的。此外，我們將從句法分布、時(shí)態(tài)表現(xiàn)和語義上對(duì)上述議題進(jìn)行解釋。
[Abstract]:Changsha dialect, which belongs to Xinxiang dialect, is the representative of Xiang dialect, which has distinct local color in pronunciation, grammar and so on. This paper mainly studies the perfect style of Changsha dialect. The dynamic auxiliary words in Changsha dialect have the characteristics of single use, compound and separation. Through the careful investigation of its dynamic auxiliary words, we try to solve the following two core problems: the comparison between "Jia" and "Da" in the perfect style of Changsha dialect and "Le" and "Guo" in the completed aspect of Chinese. The compound structure of "Ka" and "Da" in Changsha dialect. The differences and constraints. In view of the first topic mentioned above, that is, the comparison between the perfect aspect of Changsha dialect and the perfect aspect of Chinese, we will mainly pay attention to the grammatical and semantic comparison of "Jia" and "Da" with that of "Lao" and "Guo" in Chinese. Based on the study of "Ka" and "Da" in Changsha dialect by Lu (2010), we find that "Ka" represents sequence, and "Da" can represent not only cause, but also sequence and condition. "Ca" and "Da" are not absolutely different in semantics, on the contrary, they have something in common. For the second topic of this paper, we will use the feature verification theory of Chomsky (1995) minimalist scheme to explore the compound structure of "Ka" and "Da". The syntactic status and syntactic expression of "Da". In addition, we found "Cada" and "Ca". Da "has its own grammatical structure, that is," Cura "is used together, and" Ca 鈥

本文編號(hào)：2486083