言之不同,水土異也——小談語言中的環(huán)境決定說
發(fā)布時間:2019-04-16 15:13
【摘要】:正一、薩丕爾-沃爾夫假說"薩丕爾-沃爾夫假說"(Sapir-Whorfhy pothesis)是美國語言學兼人類學家薩丕爾(Edward Sapir)及其弟子沃爾夫(Benjamin Whorf)提出的有關語言與思維關系的假設,他們主張"不同的語言,不同的世界",經過不斷的質疑和修改,現(xiàn)在成為強式和弱式兩種說法。較強的原則又被稱為"語言決定論",強調語言在塑造我們的思維方式過程中起到了決定性作用。它認為一種語言決定了其語言使用者思維、說話、行為的方式,而某種特定的思維方式
[Abstract]:First, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (Sapir-Whorfhy pothesis) is a hypothesis about the relationship between language and thinking put forward by Sapir (Edward Sapir), an American linguistics and anthropologist, and his disciple, Whorf (Benjamin Whorf). They advocated that "different languages, different worlds", after constant questioning and modification, now become strong and weak. The stronger principle, also known as linguistic determinism, emphasizes that language plays a decisive role in shaping our way of thinking. It believes that a language determines the way in which its language users think, speak, and behave, and a particular way of thinking.
【分類號】:H0
[Abstract]:First, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (Sapir-Whorfhy pothesis) is a hypothesis about the relationship between language and thinking put forward by Sapir (Edward Sapir), an American linguistics and anthropologist, and his disciple, Whorf (Benjamin Whorf). They advocated that "different languages, different worlds", after constant questioning and modification, now become strong and weak. The stronger principle, also known as linguistic determinism, emphasizes that language plays a decisive role in shaping our way of thinking. It believes that a language determines the way in which its language users think, speak, and behave, and a particular way of thinking.
【分類號】:H0
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前5條
1 車歡歡;;淺談語言、文化與思維——兼評薩丕爾—沃爾夫假說[J];科教文匯(中旬刊);2007年03期
2 羅榮;對薩丕爾-沃爾夫假說的反思[J];湘潭師范學院學報(社會科學版);2004年01期
3 盧o,
本文編號:2458881
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2458881.html