《唐韻正》音注聲母研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-15 16:57
【摘要】：顧炎武是清代古音學的奠基人,他在古音研究上取得了卓越的成就,對清代的古音研究產生了深遠的影響。最能體現(xiàn)他成就的著作是《音學五書》,本論文選取其中《唐韻正》進行研究。具體內容主要包括以下兩個方面： 一、對《唐韻正》音注的聲母進行考察。顧炎武首創(chuàng)“離析唐韻”的方法,分古韻為十部,對古韻研究做出了卓越貢獻。近代有學者認為顧炎武不僅研究古韻部,還對上古聲母有所涉及,所以提出了“顧炎武已知古無輕唇音”這一論斷。我們以這一線索為切入點,對顧炎武《唐韻正》音注的聲母做了詳細地比較分析,并討論了音注材料中的例外現(xiàn)象。通過研究,我們認為顧炎武尚未對上古聲母有明確的認識。 二、對《唐韻正》音注與《廣韻》又音進行比較。在顧炎武《唐韻正》的證明材料中,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)大量存在著“今此字兩收于十二霽、十六屑部中”這樣的句子,這表明顧炎武參考了《廣韻》又音。通過與《廣韻》對比,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)：《唐韻正》所列被注字中有976字在《廣韻》中有又音,其中424字的音注與《廣韻》又音相同,占到有又音的被注字總數(shù)的近百分之五十。這說明顧炎武在給《唐韻正》被注字注音時大量采用了《廣韻》又音。 本文的創(chuàng)新點：顧炎武對于上古韻部和上古聲調的研究已經引起學界足夠的重視,但對于顧炎武的研究是否涉及到上古聲母這一問題,前人僅是通過散見于文獻中的材料進行推測,并未進行系統(tǒng)研究。本文通過對《唐韻正》注音材料的窮盡式統(tǒng)計,對注音材料中涉及到的聲母問題進行系統(tǒng)研究,得出了顧炎武尚未對上古聲母有明確認識的結論。 除此之外,本文還探討了《唐韻正》音注的來源問題,并對《唐韻正》所列《廣韻》反切與《宋本廣韻》反切不一致的58處一一進行了�？�。
[Abstract]:Gu Yanwu is the founder of ancient phonology in the Qing Dynasty. He has made remarkable achievements in the study of ancient sounds and has exerted a profound influence on the study of ancient sounds in the Qing Dynasty. The five Books of Phonology is the best one to reflect his achievements, in which Tang Yunzheng is chosen to study. The concrete content mainly includes the following two aspects: first, the consonant of Tang Yunzheng phonetic note is investigated. Gu Yanwu pioneered the method of separating Tang Yun, which divided ancient rhyme into ten parts, and made remarkable contribution to ancient rhyme research. Some modern scholars think that Gu Yanwu not only studies the ancient rhyme, but also involves the ancient consonants, so he puts forward the conclusion that "Gu Yanwu already knows that there is no light lip in ancient times". Taking this clue as the starting point, this paper makes a detailed comparative analysis of the consonants of Gu Yanwu's phonetic notes, and discusses the exceptions in the phonetic materials. Through the study, we believe that Gu Yanwu did not have a clear understanding of the ancient consonants. Secondly, the phonetic notes of Tang Yizheng are compared with those of Guangyun. In Gu Yanwu's "Tang Yunzheng" proof materials, we found a large number of such sentences as "this word is closed in twelve-and sixteen-chip parts", which indicates that Gu Yanwu refers to "Guang Yun" and "Guang Yun". Through comparison with Guangyun, we find that there are 976 characters in the notes listed in Tang Yunzheng, in which the phonetic notes of them are the same as those of Guangyun, accounting for nearly 50% of the total number of annotated characters with and without sound. This shows that Gu Yanwu used a large number of "Guangyun" and "Guang Yun" in the annotation of Tang Yunzheng. The innovation of this paper: gu Yanwu's research on the ancient rhyme and tone has attracted enough attention in the academic field, but whether Gu Yanwu's research involves the ancient consonant or not, The predecessors only speculated through the scattered materials in the literature, and did not carry on the systematic research. Based on the exhaustive statistics of "Tang Yunzheng" phonetic materials, this paper systematically studies the consonants involved in the phonetic materials, and draws a conclusion that Gu Yanwu has not yet had a clear understanding of the ancient consonants. In addition, this paper also discusses the origin of the phonetic notes of "Tang Yunzheng", and makes a collation of 58 inconsistencies between "Guangyun" and "Song Ben Guangyun" listed in "Tang Yunzheng".
【學位授予單位】：陜西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H114
本文編號：2440816
[Abstract]:Gu Yanwu is the founder of ancient phonology in the Qing Dynasty. He has made remarkable achievements in the study of ancient sounds and has exerted a profound influence on the study of ancient sounds in the Qing Dynasty. The five Books of Phonology is the best one to reflect his achievements, in which Tang Yunzheng is chosen to study. The concrete content mainly includes the following two aspects: first, the consonant of Tang Yunzheng phonetic note is investigated. Gu Yanwu pioneered the method of separating Tang Yun, which divided ancient rhyme into ten parts, and made remarkable contribution to ancient rhyme research. Some modern scholars think that Gu Yanwu not only studies the ancient rhyme, but also involves the ancient consonants, so he puts forward the conclusion that "Gu Yanwu already knows that there is no light lip in ancient times". Taking this clue as the starting point, this paper makes a detailed comparative analysis of the consonants of Gu Yanwu's phonetic notes, and discusses the exceptions in the phonetic materials. Through the study, we believe that Gu Yanwu did not have a clear understanding of the ancient consonants. Secondly, the phonetic notes of Tang Yizheng are compared with those of Guangyun. In Gu Yanwu's "Tang Yunzheng" proof materials, we found a large number of such sentences as "this word is closed in twelve-and sixteen-chip parts", which indicates that Gu Yanwu refers to "Guang Yun" and "Guang Yun". Through comparison with Guangyun, we find that there are 976 characters in the notes listed in Tang Yunzheng, in which the phonetic notes of them are the same as those of Guangyun, accounting for nearly 50% of the total number of annotated characters with and without sound. This shows that Gu Yanwu used a large number of "Guangyun" and "Guang Yun" in the annotation of Tang Yunzheng. The innovation of this paper: gu Yanwu's research on the ancient rhyme and tone has attracted enough attention in the academic field, but whether Gu Yanwu's research involves the ancient consonant or not, The predecessors only speculated through the scattered materials in the literature, and did not carry on the systematic research. Based on the exhaustive statistics of "Tang Yunzheng" phonetic materials, this paper systematically studies the consonants involved in the phonetic materials, and draws a conclusion that Gu Yanwu has not yet had a clear understanding of the ancient consonants. In addition, this paper also discusses the origin of the phonetic notes of "Tang Yunzheng", and makes a collation of 58 inconsistencies between "Guangyun" and "Song Ben Guangyun" listed in "Tang Yunzheng".
【學位授予單位】：陜西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H114
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前9條
1 張大勇;;《廣韻》異讀字的來源和分類研究[J];安慶師范學院學報(社會科學版);2012年03期
2 張民權;功蓋千古 啟牖后人──論顧炎武對-k尾入聲的離析及其貢獻[J];北京師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2000年02期
3 張民權;顧炎武對古韻分部及其演變的研究(上)——陰聲韻的離合及相關問題[J];福建師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年04期
4 張民權;顧炎武古音學成就論衡[J];福建師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1998年01期
5 孫緒武;《廣韻》又音的演變及其規(guī)范[J];廣東職業(yè)技術師范學院學報;2001年01期
6 謝艷紅;;試析顧炎武在古韻分部過程中對系聯(lián)法的運用[J];湖北師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年06期
7 謝艷紅;;再論顧炎武的離析唐韻[J];湖北師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年01期
8 楊榮祥;;從顧炎武對入聲的認識看其古音研究的得失[J];荊州師專學報;1992年01期
9 顧之川;清代古音學的開山之作——《音學五書》述評[J];山西師大學報(社會科學版);1989年04期
相關博士學位論文 前2條
1 曹強;江有誥《詩經韻讀》研究[D];陜西師范大學;2009年
2 朱瑩;陳奐《毛詩》音注研究[D];陜西師范大學;2012年
，本文編號：2440816
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2440816.html
