韓漢多層狀語連用語序?qū)Ρ?/H1>
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-12 16:36
【摘要】：本課題主要從類型學(xué)視角,對韓漢兩種語言多層狀語的連用語序進(jìn)行梳理和對比分析。全文共分八章。 第一章主要說明,韓漢多層狀語連用語序的研究意義、研究現(xiàn)狀、相關(guān)理論及方法。語序類型研究的深入,為本文能夠盡可能充分詳盡的描寫和分析韓漢多層狀語連用的語序提供了理論基礎(chǔ)和方法上的指導(dǎo)。 第二章主要對比分析,韓漢狀語的句法特征和語義類別。韓漢狀語作為謂語的狀態(tài)元,呈現(xiàn)出自由、不自由、半自由三種情況。根據(jù)句法-語義特征和語用特征,首先將韓漢狀語分為外圍性狀語和內(nèi)在性狀語,其次將內(nèi)在性狀語分為補(bǔ)足性狀語、限制性狀語和描寫性狀語。根據(jù)構(gòu)成要素,韓漢狀語分為題元狀語和非題元狀語。 第三章主要對比分析韓漢多層外圍性狀語連用語序的異同。韓漢語外圍性狀語,在句法位置上居于主語前,在語義上呈現(xiàn)出[+關(guān)聯(lián)]、[+評注]、[+限定]等語義特征,構(gòu)成要素上分為：題元狀語和非題元狀語�？傮w而言,在語義上,韓漢多層外圍性狀語的連用語序呈現(xiàn)為[+關(guān)聯(lián)][+評注][+限定]；在構(gòu)成要素上,韓漢多層狀語連用語序是非題元狀語先于題元狀語。韓國語[+關(guān)涉格]狀語歸屬于內(nèi)在性狀語,漢語的[+關(guān)涉格]狀語隸屬于外圍性狀語。 第四章主要對比分析,韓漢多層內(nèi)在性狀語連用語序的異同。韓國語多層內(nèi)在性狀語連用的語序是,限制性狀語補(bǔ)足性狀語描寫性狀語；漢語多層內(nèi)在性狀語連用的語序是限制性狀語描寫性狀語補(bǔ)足性狀語。 第五章主要對比分析,韓漢語多層題元狀語連用語序的異同。韓國語多層題元狀語的連用語序是：[+根由格]題元狀語[+條件格]題元狀語[+時地格]題元狀語[+鄰體格]題元狀語[+客體格]題元狀語；漢語多層題元狀語的連用語序是：[+根由格]題元狀語[+條件格]題元狀語[關(guān)涉格]題元狀語[+時地格]題元狀語[+鄰體格]題元狀語[+客體格]題元狀語。韓國語[關(guān)涉格]題元狀語是內(nèi)在性狀語,漢語[關(guān)涉格]題元狀語是外圍性狀語。 第六章主要對比分析韓漢多層副詞狀語連用語序的異同。韓漢多層副詞狀語的連用語序是,關(guān)聯(lián)性副詞評注性副詞限定性副詞描摹性副詞。韓國語的否定副詞狀語最靠近謂語,漢語的否定副詞則隨否定域而移位。 第七章主要描寫和分析漢語多層補(bǔ)語連用語序及在韓國語中的對應(yīng)表現(xiàn)。從而進(jìn)一步驗證漢語的補(bǔ)語同狀語一樣是降級述謂性成分,是謂語的補(bǔ)足性成分,對應(yīng)于韓國語的狀語或謂語。 第八章是結(jié)語,主要說明本課題所作的基本工作、創(chuàng)新之處和不足之處。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of typology, this paper makes a contrastive analysis of the sequence of consecutive adverbial words in Korean and Chinese languages. The full text is divided into eight chapters. The first chapter mainly explains the significance, the present situation, the related theories and methods of the research on the order of multiple adverbial conjunctions in Han and Han dynasties. The in-depth study of word order types provides the theoretical basis and methodological guidance for this paper to describe and analyze the word order of Han-Han multi-layered adverbial conjunction in as much detail as possible. Chapter two is a contrastive analysis of the syntactic features and semantic categories of Han-Han adverbial. Han-Han adverbial, as a state element of predicate, presents three kinds of conditions: freedom, non-freedom and semi-freedom. According to the syntactic-semantic and pragmatic features, the Han-Han adverbial is firstly divided into peripheral adverbial and intrinsic adverbial, then the intrinsic adverbial is divided into complementary adverbial, restrictive adverbial and descriptive adverbial. According to the constituent elements, Han-Han adverbial is divided into thematic meta-adverbial and non-thematic meta-adverbial. The third chapter mainly compares and analyzes the similarities and differences of the order of multi-layer peripheral adverbial conjunctions between Han and Han. Korean-Chinese peripheral adverbial, which occupies the front of the subject in syntactic position, presents semantic features such as [relevance], [commentary], [restriction] and so on. The constituent elements are as follows: thematic meta-adverbial and non-thematic meta-adverbial. In general, the sequential order of Han-Han multi-layer peripheral adverbial appears as [relevance] [commentary] [limit], and in the constituent elements, the order of non-topic adverbial is prior to the title meta-adverbial. The sentence order of Han-Han multi-layer adverbial is related to [commentary] [limited] in terms of the constituent elements of Han-Han multi-layered adverbial. The Korean adverbial belongs to the intrinsic adverbial, and the Chinese one belongs to the peripheral adverbial. The fourth chapter is a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences in the order of adverbial conjunctions between Han and Han Chinese. The word order of Korean multilayered intrinsic adverbial is the descriptive adverbial of restrictive adverbial complement, and the order of Chinese multilayered intrinsic adverbial is limited adverbial descriptive adverbial complement. The fifth chapter is a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences of Korean-Chinese multi-level meta-adverbial order. The sequential order of Korean multi-level item meta-adverbial is as follows: [root case] question meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [neighbor case] item meta-adverbial [object case] item meta-adverbial, [object-case] item meta-adverbial, [root-case] item meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [time-case] item meta-adverbial; The sequential order of Chinese multi-level item meta-adverbial is as follows: [root case] question meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [related case] item meta-adverbial [neighbor case] item meta-adverbial [object case] item meta-adverbial. The subadverbial order of Chinese multi-level item meta-adverbial is: [root-case] item meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [related case]; The Korean meta-adverbial is an intrinsic adverbial, while the Chinese one is a peripheral adverbial. The sixth chapter mainly contrasts and analyzes the similarities and differences of the order of adverbial conjunction between Han and Han. The sequential order of adverbial adverbs in Han and Han is that the adverbs of relevance adverbs are critical adverbs with definite adverbs describing imitative adverbs. Korean negative adverbs are closest to predicates, while Chinese negative adverbs shift with non-localization. The seventh chapter mainly describes and analyzes the sequence of Chinese multi-level complement and its corresponding expression in Korean. As a result, the complement of Chinese is the same as adverbial, which is the complement of predicate, corresponding to the adverbial or predicate of Korean. Chapter 8 is the conclusion, which mainly explains the basic work, innovation and deficiency of this topic.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H146;H55
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 巴旭華;韓國學(xué)生漢語多項狀語習(xí)得的偏誤分析及教學(xué)對策[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2014年
，
本文編號：2438963
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2438963.html
[Abstract]:From the perspective of typology, this paper makes a contrastive analysis of the sequence of consecutive adverbial words in Korean and Chinese languages. The full text is divided into eight chapters. The first chapter mainly explains the significance, the present situation, the related theories and methods of the research on the order of multiple adverbial conjunctions in Han and Han dynasties. The in-depth study of word order types provides the theoretical basis and methodological guidance for this paper to describe and analyze the word order of Han-Han multi-layered adverbial conjunction in as much detail as possible. Chapter two is a contrastive analysis of the syntactic features and semantic categories of Han-Han adverbial. Han-Han adverbial, as a state element of predicate, presents three kinds of conditions: freedom, non-freedom and semi-freedom. According to the syntactic-semantic and pragmatic features, the Han-Han adverbial is firstly divided into peripheral adverbial and intrinsic adverbial, then the intrinsic adverbial is divided into complementary adverbial, restrictive adverbial and descriptive adverbial. According to the constituent elements, Han-Han adverbial is divided into thematic meta-adverbial and non-thematic meta-adverbial. The third chapter mainly compares and analyzes the similarities and differences of the order of multi-layer peripheral adverbial conjunctions between Han and Han. Korean-Chinese peripheral adverbial, which occupies the front of the subject in syntactic position, presents semantic features such as [relevance], [commentary], [restriction] and so on. The constituent elements are as follows: thematic meta-adverbial and non-thematic meta-adverbial. In general, the sequential order of Han-Han multi-layer peripheral adverbial appears as [relevance] [commentary] [limit], and in the constituent elements, the order of non-topic adverbial is prior to the title meta-adverbial. The sentence order of Han-Han multi-layer adverbial is related to [commentary] [limited] in terms of the constituent elements of Han-Han multi-layered adverbial. The Korean adverbial belongs to the intrinsic adverbial, and the Chinese one belongs to the peripheral adverbial. The fourth chapter is a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences in the order of adverbial conjunctions between Han and Han Chinese. The word order of Korean multilayered intrinsic adverbial is the descriptive adverbial of restrictive adverbial complement, and the order of Chinese multilayered intrinsic adverbial is limited adverbial descriptive adverbial complement. The fifth chapter is a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences of Korean-Chinese multi-level meta-adverbial order. The sequential order of Korean multi-level item meta-adverbial is as follows: [root case] question meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [neighbor case] item meta-adverbial [object case] item meta-adverbial, [object-case] item meta-adverbial, [root-case] item meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [time-case] item meta-adverbial; The sequential order of Chinese multi-level item meta-adverbial is as follows: [root case] question meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [related case] item meta-adverbial [neighbor case] item meta-adverbial [object case] item meta-adverbial. The subadverbial order of Chinese multi-level item meta-adverbial is: [root-case] item meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [related case]; The Korean meta-adverbial is an intrinsic adverbial, while the Chinese one is a peripheral adverbial. The sixth chapter mainly contrasts and analyzes the similarities and differences of the order of adverbial conjunction between Han and Han. The sequential order of adverbial adverbs in Han and Han is that the adverbs of relevance adverbs are critical adverbs with definite adverbs describing imitative adverbs. Korean negative adverbs are closest to predicates, while Chinese negative adverbs shift with non-localization. The seventh chapter mainly describes and analyzes the sequence of Chinese multi-level complement and its corresponding expression in Korean. As a result, the complement of Chinese is the same as adverbial, which is the complement of predicate, corresponding to the adverbial or predicate of Korean. Chapter 8 is the conclusion, which mainly explains the basic work, innovation and deficiency of this topic.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H146;H55
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 巴旭華;韓國學(xué)生漢語多項狀語習(xí)得的偏誤分析及教學(xué)對策[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2014年
，本文編號：2438963
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2438963.html
最近更新
教材專著
