【摘要】：Lakoff和Johnson的Metaphors We Live By的問世，使得隱喻成為人分認(rèn)知機(jī)制的重要組成部分，“概念隱喻—作為人分思維抽象范疇內(nèi)強(qiáng)而有力的認(rèn)知工具”，不僅對(duì)人分最基本的認(rèn)知研式，而且對(duì)人分認(rèn)知都產(chǎn)研了巨大的影響。同時(shí)，書中在探討概念隱喻時(shí)論出了意象圖式這一概念，已經(jīng)成為認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的一個(gè)重要概念。西研的語(yǔ)言學(xué)家已經(jīng)將意象圖式用于分析論學(xué)作品(Lakoff and Turner1989, Freeman2002)，這一舉措肯定了意象圖式理論可以用于論學(xué)作品的分析。 《圣經(jīng)》，，作為基督教的信仰經(jīng)典，是上帝實(shí)施救贖、基督徒得蒙救恩的途徑。上帝籍著《圣經(jīng)》向世人宣揚(yáng)得救的信息�！妒ソ�(jīng)》也是論學(xué)巨匠們的創(chuàng)造的源泉。對(duì)于《圣經(jīng)》中所體現(xiàn)的語(yǔ)言藝術(shù)，大多的神學(xué)家和語(yǔ)言學(xué)家多從修辭的角度對(duì)其進(jìn)行研研，試圖理解圣經(jīng)所包含的奧秘，但這仍局限于語(yǔ)言的修辭層面。 本論擬從一個(gè)新的角度對(duì)《圣經(jīng)》隱喻做出分析。意象圖式是指由人分的感知論互和物理運(yùn)動(dòng)共同作用而形成的有意義的結(jié)構(gòu)。本論從認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的意象圖式角度入手，分析《圣經(jīng)》中的隱喻。本論采用了定性的研研研法，分析《圣經(jīng)》中的隱喻。本論旨在介紹隱喻和意象圖式概念及分分的同時(shí)，通過(guò)將意象圖式理論運(yùn)用到《圣經(jīng)》的分析中來(lái)進(jìn)一步加深意象圖式理論在實(shí)踐中的可操作性。本論的語(yǔ)料選自于《圣經(jīng)》中的《新約》和《舊約》。研研結(jié)果表明《圣經(jīng)》中的隱喻無(wú)處不在。其原型一般有動(dòng)物，植物，天氣等事物，通過(guò)分析，使讀學(xué)更加理解《圣經(jīng)》中隱喻的內(nèi)涵，更好的理解西研論化的根基。通過(guò)從五種不同分型的意向圖示對(duì)《圣經(jīng)》隱喻進(jìn)行分析，來(lái)證明意象圖示理論的實(shí)用性。從認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的角度分析《圣經(jīng)》隱喻，首先，可以豐富人們對(duì)圣經(jīng)隱喻的研研；其次，使基督徒對(duì)《圣經(jīng)》中的教義有著更深刻的理解；最后使非基督徒對(duì)《圣經(jīng)》中的語(yǔ)言和論化有更深刻的認(rèn)識(shí)。
[Abstract]:With the advent of Metaphors We Live By of Lakoff and Johnson, metaphor has become an important part of the cognitive mechanism of human division. "Conceptual metaphor, as a powerful cognitive tool within the abstract category of human sub-thinking", is not only the most basic cognitive research form of human subdivision. Moreover, it has a great influence on people's cognition. At the same time, the book discusses the concept of image schema in the discussion of conceptual metaphor, which has become an important concept in cognitive linguistics. The linguists of Xiyan have applied image schema to the work of analytical theory (Lakoff and Turner1989, Freeman2002), which confirms that the theory of image schema can be used in the analysis of theoretical works. The Bible, as a Christian canon, is God's salvation and salvation for Christians. God preaches the message of salvation through the Bible. The Bible is also a source of creation for the great theorists. For the art of language embodied in the Bible, most theologians and linguists study it from a rhetorical point of view, trying to understand the mysteries contained in the Bible, but this is still confined to the rhetorical level of language. This paper tries to analyze the metaphor of the Bible from a new angle. Image schema is a meaningful structure formed by the interaction of perception theory and physical movement. From the perspective of image schema in cognitive linguistics, this paper analyzes metaphors in the Bible. Qualitative research is used to analyze metaphors in the Bible. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concepts and points of metaphor and image schema, and at the same time, to further deepen the operability of image schema theory in practice by applying the theory of image schema to the analysis of the Bible. The corpus of this theory comes from the New Testament and the Old Testament in the Bible. Research suggests that metaphors are ubiquitous in the Bible. Its archetypes include animals, plants, weather and so on. Through analysis, we can understand the meaning of metaphor in the Bible better, and better understand the foundation of the theory of western research. Through the analysis of biblical metaphors from five different types of intention diagrams, this paper proves the practicability of image representation theory. Analyzing biblical metaphors from the perspective of cognitive linguistics, firstly, can enrich the study of biblical metaphors, secondly, make Christians have a deeper understanding of biblical doctrines; Finally, non-Christians have a deeper understanding of the language and argumentation of the Bible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：H05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王新;李杉嬋;;從《圣經(jīng)》的中英文譯本談對(duì)隱喻理解的普遍性[J];內(nèi)蒙古工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

2 朱瑞青;;概念隱喻視域下《周易》和《圣經(jīng)》生態(tài)觀念對(duì)比[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

3 王磊;;概念合成理論與《圣經(jīng)·新約》中寓言比喻的闡釋[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2008年04期

4 任紹曾;;概念隱喻與語(yǔ)篇——對(duì)體現(xiàn)概念隱喻的語(yǔ)篇的多維分析[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;2008年02期

5 陳朗;;隱喻機(jī)制在宗教語(yǔ)篇中的勸諫性構(gòu)建功能[J];江南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

6 李詩(shī)平;隱喻的結(jié)構(gòu)類型與認(rèn)知功能研究[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2003年01期

本文編號(hào)：2306496