【摘要】：庭審話語(yǔ)體現(xiàn)了法庭審判中各參與者之間由于話語(yǔ)資源的不均衡而產(chǎn)生的權(quán)力不對(duì)稱。同時(shí)，，權(quán)力不對(duì)稱的關(guān)系又影響著庭審話語(yǔ)的內(nèi)容和方式。目前國(guó)內(nèi)研究庭審話語(yǔ)與權(quán)力關(guān)系的學(xué)者側(cè)重于運(yùn)用話語(yǔ)分析研究庭審話語(yǔ)，而從語(yǔ)境角度研究庭審話語(yǔ)與權(quán)力之間關(guān)系的資料不多。因此，本文作者結(jié)合語(yǔ)境理論，著重從語(yǔ)言學(xué)的角度研究研究庭審參與者的作用、地位以及其權(quán)力實(shí)現(xiàn)的手段。 本文運(yùn)用語(yǔ)境理論，對(duì)當(dāng)前的庭審話語(yǔ)權(quán)力在語(yǔ)境層面上進(jìn)行分析，試圖揭示中國(guó)法庭審判中話語(yǔ)與權(quán)力的關(guān)系。通過(guò)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)法庭審判的錄音轉(zhuǎn)寫材料進(jìn)行分析，以實(shí)現(xiàn)以下目標(biāo)： 1揭示庭審中各個(gè)參與者的地位。 2揭示庭審話語(yǔ)中權(quán)力控制的表現(xiàn)形式。 3探討庭審中各話語(yǔ)方實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)力控制或權(quán)力抵制的手段。 本文作者嘗試運(yùn)用語(yǔ)境理論，從情景語(yǔ)境、上下文語(yǔ)境和文化語(yǔ)境三個(gè)維度分析研究庭審話語(yǔ)。在情景語(yǔ)境下，分析法庭的場(chǎng)景、庭審話題以及各個(gè)參與者所扮演的角色，發(fā)現(xiàn)在法庭這個(gè)場(chǎng)景下，權(quán)力以固定的形式分配于各個(gè)參與者。在上下文語(yǔ)境下，主要研究庭審主要參與者如法官、公訴人、律師和原被告的話語(yǔ)手段。庭審審判過(guò)程事實(shí)上是一種庭審參與者之間的權(quán)力較量過(guò)程。法官是最有權(quán)勢(shì)的主體，可以進(jìn)行指示、問(wèn)話、裁決、甚至打斷等話語(yǔ)行為。公訴人和律師的權(quán)力則次之，而原被告則是處于被主導(dǎo)的地位，只能就他人的問(wèn)話提供具體確切的答話。。在文化語(yǔ)境下，主要分析不同的法律體制、不同的法律文化、不同的法院建筑和庭審中參與者不同的背景，在庭審話語(yǔ)和權(quán)力分配中起到怎樣的影響。 綜上所述，作者主要是運(yùn)用語(yǔ)境理論對(duì)中國(guó)庭審話語(yǔ)進(jìn)行研究。本文創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)在于運(yùn)用語(yǔ)境理論對(duì)庭審話語(yǔ)進(jìn)行分析。
[Abstract]:The trial discourse reflects the asymmetry of power between the participants in the trial due to the imbalance of discourse resources. At the same time, the asymmetry of power affects the content and mode of court discourse. At present, domestic scholars who study the relationship between trial discourse and power focus on the use of discourse analysis to study court discourse, but there are few materials to study the relationship between court discourse and power from the perspective of context. Therefore, combining with context theory, the author focuses on the role and status of trial participants and the means to realize their power from the perspective of linguistics. Based on the theory of context, this paper analyzes the relationship between discourse and power in court trial in China. Through the analysis of the recorded transcripts of the on-site court trial, the following objectives are achieved: 1 revealing the status of each participant in the trial. (2) to reveal the manifestation of power control in court discourse. Third, to explore the means of power control or power resistance. The author tries to use the theory of context to analyze the trial discourse from three dimensions: situational context, contextual context and cultural context. In the context of the situation, this paper analyzes the court scene, the trial topic and the roles played by each participant, and finds that in the court context, power is assigned to each participant in a fixed form. In the context of the context, the main participants in the trial such as judges, prosecutors, lawyers and the original defendant discourse. In fact, the trial process is a process of power contest between the participants in the trial. The judge is the most powerful subject, who can direct, question, adjudicate, and even interrupt. The power of the prosecutor and the lawyer is second, and the original defendant is in the dominant position, can only provide specific and precise answers to the questions of others. In the context of culture, it mainly analyzes different legal systems, different legal cultures, different court buildings and different backgrounds of participants in court hearings. To sum up, the author mainly uses context theory to study Chinese trial discourse. The innovation of this paper is to use context theory to analyze the trial discourse.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 胡海娟;法庭話語(yǔ)研究綜論[J];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

2 廖美珍;;中國(guó)法庭互動(dòng)話語(yǔ)formulation現(xiàn)象研究[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2006年02期

3 熊學(xué)亮;語(yǔ)用學(xué)和認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊(黑龍江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));1996年03期

4 廖美珍;目的原則與法庭互動(dòng)話語(yǔ)合作問(wèn)題研究[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2004年05期

5 胡壯麟;語(yǔ)境研究的多元化[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;2002年03期

6 何兆熊,蔣艷梅;語(yǔ)境的動(dòng)態(tài)研究[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));1997年06期

7 杜金榜;從目前的研究看法律語(yǔ)言學(xué)學(xué)科體系的構(gòu)建[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);2000年01期

8 廖美珍;;中國(guó)法庭互動(dòng)話語(yǔ)對(duì)應(yīng)結(jié)構(gòu)研究[J];語(yǔ)言科學(xué);2003年05期

9 廖美珍;從問(wèn)答行為看中國(guó)法庭審判現(xiàn)狀[J];語(yǔ)言文字應(yīng)用;2002年04期

本文編號(hào)：2302129