【摘要】：本文通過定量分析的研究方法,考察了留學(xué)生對(duì)于“能”、“會(huì)”、“可以”這一組能愿動(dòng)詞在[能力][可能性][許可]這三個(gè)交叉義項(xiàng)上的習(xí)得情況。通過基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的定量研究和基于問卷調(diào)查的定量研究這兩種方式,運(yùn)用偏誤分析、相關(guān)性分析等手段,考察了學(xué)習(xí)者對(duì)這組詞交叉義項(xiàng)的偏誤情況、習(xí)得順序以及習(xí)得效果的影響因素,并以此為基礎(chǔ)對(duì)教學(xué)提出了一些建議。全文共分七個(gè)部分,分別是：第一章,緒論。交代了本研究的選題緣由和意義,研究對(duì)象和內(nèi)容,以及研究方法等基本信息。第二章,前人研究綜述�；仡櫫诉^去幾十年已有的文獻(xiàn)中,對(duì)于“能”、“會(huì)”、“可以”的本體研究和習(xí)得研究所取得的相關(guān)成果。第三章,“能”、“會(huì)”、“可以”的意義和用法分類。對(duì)《現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)八百詞》等工具書中“能”、“會(huì)”、“可以”的語(yǔ)義分類進(jìn)行了梳理,并且在前人分類的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合情態(tài)系統(tǒng)的分類情況,總結(jié)出了這組詞的交叉義項(xiàng)分類,作為本研究的基礎(chǔ)。第四章,基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的定量研究。對(duì)60萬字的留學(xué)生中介語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料進(jìn)行分析,從輸出情況、初現(xiàn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和正確率等多個(gè)方面考察了留學(xué)生對(duì)于“能”、“會(huì)”、“可以”交叉義項(xiàng)的習(xí)得順序和發(fā)展過程。第五章,基于問卷調(diào)查的定量研究。在問卷調(diào)查的基礎(chǔ)之上,考察了留學(xué)生對(duì)于“能”、“會(huì)”、“可以”交叉義項(xiàng)的習(xí)得順序,作為上文語(yǔ)料庫(kù)研究的驗(yàn)證和補(bǔ)充。并通過相關(guān)性分析等統(tǒng)計(jì)手段,對(duì)母語(yǔ)和漢語(yǔ)水平對(duì)習(xí)得效果的影響進(jìn)行了考察。第六章,結(jié)語(yǔ)�？偨Y(jié)了全文的主要內(nèi)容和研究結(jié)果,在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)實(shí)際的課堂教學(xué)提出了一些建議,并指出了本研究存在的一些不足之處以及可以進(jìn)一步研究的空間。
[Abstract]:By means of quantitative analysis, this paper examines the acquisition of "ability" [possibility] [permission] by foreign students for "can", "will", "can" and "can". By means of corpus-based quantitative study and questionnaire based quantitative study, this paper investigates learners' errors to the cross-meaning of this group of words by means of error analysis and correlation analysis. On the basis of this, some suggestions are put forward on the basis of the order of acquisition and the factors affecting the effect of acquisition. The full text is divided into seven parts, respectively: the first chapter, introduction. This paper explains the reason and significance of this research, research object and content, and basic information such as research methods. The second chapter is a review of previous studies. This paper reviews the related achievements of the ontology research and acquisition research on "can", "can" and "can" in the literature of the past decades. The meaning and usage of "can", "can" and "can" are classified in Chapter 3. The semantic classification of "Neng", "Hui", "can" and "can" in the reference book "800 words in Modern Chinese" is combed, and on the basis of the former classification, combined with the classification of modality system, the author summarizes the cross-meaning classification of this group of words. As the basis of this study. Chapter four, Corpus-based quantitative study. This paper analyzes the interlanguage data of 600000 words of foreign students, and examines the acquisition order and development process of cross meanings of "can", "can" and "can" from the aspects of output, initial appearance standard and correct rate. Chapter five, quantitative research based on questionnaire. On the basis of the questionnaire, this paper investigates the acquisition order of "can", "can" and "can" by foreign students as a verification and supplement to the corpus study above. The influence of mother tongue and Chinese level on acquisition effect was investigated by means of correlation analysis. Chapter six, conclusion. This paper summarizes the main contents and research results of the full text, and puts forward some suggestions for the actual classroom teaching on this basis, and points out some shortcomings of this study and the space for further study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：H195

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蘇崗;“會(huì)”表示可能的分析[J];邢臺(tái)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2244820