【摘要】：話題現(xiàn)象是語言學(xué)研究的熱點(diǎn)，功能派、形式派都從各自的立場對(duì)話題概念進(jìn)行界定。從功能上說，話題具有已知性，是話語的出發(fā)點(diǎn)，是句子內(nèi)容相關(guān)之所在。從結(jié)構(gòu)上說，話題可以被定義為句首的成分，語序也是話題化的手段之一。 對(duì)漢語話題而言，趙元任（1968）認(rèn)為漢語的主語和話題是等同的，而Li和Thompson（1976）在“主語-話題”的類型學(xué)里把漢語歸為話題優(yōu)先型語言，英語歸為主語優(yōu)先型語言，使人們將話題和主語區(qū)別對(duì)待。徐烈炯、劉丹青贊同他們關(guān)于漢語話題優(yōu)先型的觀點(diǎn)，并用上海方言為研究對(duì)象，以喬姆斯基的一般化轉(zhuǎn)換說為理論框架，把漢語話題定義為一個(gè)語法化的句法成分，并把話題從結(jié)構(gòu)位置上分為主話題、次話題和次次話題，開創(chuàng)了用當(dāng)代語言類型學(xué)的成果來研究漢語方言的句法類型的先河，也做出了把漢語話題作為一種句法成分而建立一種新的漢語語法體系的大膽嘗試。但徐烈炯、劉丹青在理論上設(shè)立主話題、次話題、次次話題的做法也導(dǎo)致了句法歧義的產(chǎn)生，袁毓林（2003）就指出這種句法歧義的產(chǎn)生究竟是句子本身的結(jié)構(gòu)造成還是理論上的設(shè)置所致，并且懷疑主話題、次話題和次次話題劃分的必要性。徐、劉二位學(xué)者與袁毓林的分歧在于從理論上把話題作為句法結(jié)構(gòu)上的概念處理還是作為功能層面的概念處理。石毓智（2001）也認(rèn)為漢語中的主語和話題不能劃等號(hào)，句法上的主語可以成為話題的一種表現(xiàn)形式，話題可以分為無標(biāo)記話題和標(biāo)記性話題兩種形式。 針對(duì)漢語話題界定的這種糾葛，本文在分析徐烈炯、劉丹青對(duì)漢語話題句法定義的基礎(chǔ)上，從功能層面對(duì)話題進(jìn)行界定，并根據(jù)不同成分具備話題功能時(shí)的不同結(jié)構(gòu)特點(diǎn)把話題分為標(biāo)記性話題和無標(biāo)記話題。本文以重慶話口語為研究對(duì)象，通過隨機(jī)錄音建立了約50669字的重慶話口語語料庫，對(duì)重慶話口語中可以用作話題標(biāo)記的后附性虛詞“耶”、“U;”、“嘜”、“噯”進(jìn)行分析，以說話人性別和年齡為變量，探究性別和年齡是否導(dǎo)致這些后附性虛詞在使用功能上的差異，是否導(dǎo)致它們用作話題標(biāo)記時(shí)的使用差異以及是否導(dǎo)致它們用作語氣詞時(shí)的使用差異。本文還分析了重慶話口語中話題的主要功能和句子中多個(gè)話題并存時(shí)的相互關(guān)系，對(duì)于漢語話題的語法化，本文也通過分析漢語里，，尤其是重慶話口語里不同成分具備話題功能的不同結(jié)構(gòu)，認(rèn)為漢語話題語法化程度高于英語話題語法化程度并非由于漢語話題已經(jīng)語法化為一個(gè)句法成分，而是因?yàn)闈h語話題語法化的形式更加豐富，無論是具備話題功能成分的多樣性和廣泛性，還是話題標(biāo)記手段的多樣性，都說明漢語話題較高的語法化程度。對(duì)于漢語里特有的“把”字句結(jié)構(gòu)，本文也分析了它的話題性，認(rèn)為從功能層面講，“把”字結(jié)構(gòu)的話題功能是顯而易見的。最后，本文還分析了話題的指稱性，無論是名詞性結(jié)構(gòu)作話題，還是動(dòng)詞性結(jié)構(gòu)或小句作話題，都有一定的指稱特點(diǎn)。 本文結(jié)合功能和句法的理論知識(shí)，以重慶話口語為研究對(duì)象，對(duì)漢語話題從功能上進(jìn)行界定，并探究漢語及其方言里實(shí)現(xiàn)話題功能的各種句法手段，同時(shí)以社會(huì)語言學(xué)和統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)的方法分析重慶話口語里特有話題標(biāo)記詞的真實(shí)使用情況，希望對(duì)漢語話題和重慶方言的研究提供新的借鑒和參考。
[Abstract]:Topic phenomenon is a hot topic in linguistics. Both functional and formal schools define the concept of topic from their own standpoints. Functionally speaking, topic is known, the starting point of discourse and the content of a sentence is related. Structurally speaking, topic can be defined as the component of the beginning of a sentence, and word order is also one of the means of topicalization.
Zhao Yuanren (1968) thinks the subject and topic are the same in Chinese, while Li and Thompson (1976) classify Chinese as topic-priority language and English as subject-priority language in the typology of subject-topic, which makes people differentiate between topic and subject. Taking the Shanghai dialect as the research object and Chomsky's theory of generalized transformation as the theoretical framework, this paper defines the Chinese topic as a grammaticalized syntactic component, and divides the topic into the main topic, the sub-topic and the sub-topic from the structural position, thus creating the achievements of contemporary linguistic typology to study Chinese dialects. However, Xu Lijiong and Liu Danqing set up the main topic, the sub-topic and the sub-topic in theory, which also led to the emergence of syntactic ambiguity. Yuan Yulin (2003) pointed out that this kind of syntactic ambiguity came into being. The difference between Xu, Liu and Yuan Yulin lies in whether the topic is treated as a syntactic concept or as a functional concept. Shi Yuzhi (2001) also thinks that the Han Dynasty is a Chinese language. Subject and topic can not be equally labeled, and the syntactic subject can be a form of expression of the topic, which can be divided into two forms: unmarked topic and marked topic.
In view of this entanglement in the definition of Chinese topic, this paper, on the basis of analyzing Xu Liejiong and Liu Danqing's definition of Chinese topic syntax, defines the topic from the functional level, and divides the topic into marked topic and unmarked topic according to the different structural characteristics of different components with topic function. Xiangxiang, an oral corpus of about 50669 words in Chongqing dialect is set up by random recording. The function of these auxiliary functional words, which can be used as topic markers in spoken Chongqing dialect, is analyzed. The gender and age of the speaker are taken as variables to explore whether gender and age lead to the functional differences of these auxiliary functional words. This paper also analyzes the main functions of topics in spoken Chongqing dialect and the relationship between multiple topics in sentences. As for the grammaticalization of Chinese topics, this paper also analyzes the grammaticalization of Chinese topics, especially Chongqing. It is believed that the grammaticalization degree of Chinese topic is higher than that of English topic not because the Chinese topic has been grammaticalized into a syntactic component, but because the forms of Chinese topic grammaticalization are more abundant, regardless of the diversity and extensiveness of topic functional components. The variety of topic markers indicates the high degree of grammaticalization of Chinese topics. This paper also analyzes the topic nature of the unique "ba" sentence structure in Chinese and holds that the topic function of the "ba" structure is obvious from the functional level. Whether the sexual structure is a topic or a verbal structure or a minor clause is a topic of reference.
Based on the theoretical knowledge of function and syntax, this paper takes the spoken Chongqing dialect as the research object, defines the Chinese topic from the functional point of view, and explores the various syntactic means to realize the topic function in Chinese and its dialects. At the same time, it analyzes the real use of the special topic markers in spoken Chongqing dialect by means of sociolinguistics and statistics. I hope to provide new reference and reference for the study of Chinese topic and Chongqing dialect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H172.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張伯江,方梅;漢語口語的主位結(jié)構(gòu)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年02期

2 文旭;;話題與話題構(gòu)式的認(rèn)知闡釋[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

3 李大勤;“關(guān)系化”對(duì)“話題化”的影響——漢語話題結(jié)構(gòu)個(gè)案分析[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);2001年02期

4 李寶倫,潘海華,徐烈炯;對(duì)焦點(diǎn)敏感的結(jié)構(gòu)及焦點(diǎn)的語義解釋(上)[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);2003年01期

5 張孝榮;;漢語話題結(jié)構(gòu)中的移位研究[J];安徽理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

6 聶仁發(fā);;不定指話題及其語用策略[J];漢語學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

7 劉培玉;把字句的句法、語義和語用分析[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年05期

8 孟艷麗;也論“把”字句的主題和焦點(diǎn)[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

9 陳虎;語言信息結(jié)構(gòu)及其多視角研究述評(píng)[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

10 周士宏;;信息結(jié)構(gòu)中的對(duì)比焦點(diǎn)和對(duì)比話題——兼論話題焦點(diǎn)的性質(zhì)[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鐘華;現(xiàn)代漢語焦點(diǎn)表現(xiàn)手段研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2007年

2 張全生;現(xiàn)代漢語焦點(diǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];南開大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2228009