《雷雨》中的話語標(biāo)記研究
[Abstract]:Taking the modern drama thunderstorm as the object of study, this paper uses qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, classification description, comparison, statistics and other methods to describe and explain the rich discourse markers in the dialogue of the works in as detailed and systematic a way as possible. The purpose of this paper is to sum up the pragmatic functions of discourse markers in the play, to probe into the factors that affect the use of discourse markers in the play, and to explore the linguistic characteristics of thunderstorm from the perspective of the use of discourse markers. This paper attempts to provide a reference for the study of the combination of linguistics and literature, as well as the enrichment and development of discourse marker theory. Discourse marker is an important part of daily oral communication. It can influence the construction and understanding of discourse in part or as a whole, guide and restrict human communication activities, and is an important means to ensure the smooth progress of oral communication. As a drama dialogue based on daily dialogue, discourse marker is naturally an important part of it, and plays an important role in promoting the development of drama plot and showing the relationship between characters and characters. Based on previous studies, this paper clearly defines discourse markers and distinguishes them from independent words. On this basis, the 18 lexical forms of discourse markers in thunderstorm are divided into structural discourse markers and communicative discourse markers, and the pragmatic functions of each kind of discourse markers in the play are analyzed and summarized one by one. After detailed analysis, this paper argues that the main factors restricting the use of discourse markers in thunderstorm are the preservation of language style, speaker characteristics, context, and the preservation of face and the observance of the principle of cooperation and politeness in dialogue. By comparing with the other three plays of Cao Yu, namely, Sunrise >, Field >, Beijing Man and Lao She's Teahouse, Longxugou, the paper concludes that the two characteristics of discourse markers used in thunderstorm are as follows: first, there are many kinds and large quantities; Personal pronouns as sensory verbs are widely used as discourse markers. The use of discourse markers also reflects the colloquial, individualized and implicit beauty of thunderstorm.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:I207.3;H136
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陰瑛;;影響話語標(biāo)記語使用的因素研究[J];讀與寫(教育教學(xué)刊);2008年08期
2 黃大網(wǎng);話語標(biāo)記研究綜述[J];福建外語;2001年01期
3 司建國;;從話語結(jié)構(gòu)角度解讀《雷雨》的戲劇沖突[J];北京第二外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年02期
4 王寒娜;;話語標(biāo)記研究綜述[J];綏化學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期
5 鄭娟曼;張先亮;;“責(zé)怪”式話語標(biāo)記“你看你”[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2009年02期
6 李宗江;;關(guān)于話語標(biāo)記來源研究的兩點(diǎn)看法——從“我說”類話語標(biāo)記的來源說起[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2010年02期
7 樂耀;;從“不是我說你”類話語標(biāo)記的形成看會話中主觀性范疇與語用原則的互動[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2011年01期
8 司建國;;言語行為理論視角中《雷雨》的人物關(guān)系[J];深圳職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年03期
9 沈家煊;語言的“主觀性”和“主觀化”[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2001年04期
10 司建國;會話分析理論對中國戲劇研究的啟示——禮貌原則映射下的《雷雨》的戲劇沖突[J];西北師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 劉麗艷;口語交際中的話語標(biāo)記[D];浙江大學(xué);2005年
2 于海飛;話輪轉(zhuǎn)換中的話語標(biāo)記研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條
1 黃超;《楊瀾訪談錄》中的常用話語標(biāo)記“然后”和“所以”[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年
2 賀文麗;“那么”的認(rèn)知語用分析及其教學(xué)啟示[D];暨南大學(xué);2004年
3 沈娉;話語標(biāo)記語與元認(rèn)知[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年
4 耿小敏;“我說”類元語言的研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2006年
5 溫素平;“不是我VP”類話語標(biāo)記語研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年
6 楊永華;現(xiàn)代漢語敘實(shí)性話語標(biāo)記語研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2008年
7 余奕;“說”類插入語研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年
8 苗麗;推論性話語標(biāo)記“你看”研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年
本文編號:2140537
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2140537.html