本文選題：語(yǔ)篇 + 連貫　； 參考：《魯東大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為復(fù)雜的語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象，連貫一直以來是語(yǔ)言學(xué)家關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。它最早來源于修辭學(xué)，是使文章獲得統(tǒng)一性的重要前提，如今連貫己成為語(yǔ)篇分析的重要研究對(duì)象。連貫是一個(gè)復(fù)雜的語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象，涉及語(yǔ)義、語(yǔ)用以及認(rèn)知等各方面，隨著人們對(duì)語(yǔ)篇認(rèn)識(shí)的深化以及認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的迅速崛起，近年來從認(rèn)知角度來解讀語(yǔ)篇連貫越來越受到重視。 就研究角度而言，學(xué)者大多熱衷于從語(yǔ)篇本身或者通過隱喻研究語(yǔ)篇連貫，本文選取的研究視角是意象圖式。概觀以往意象圖式與語(yǔ)篇連貫的研究，基本從兩個(gè)方面分析：一方面，意象圖式基于不同的感覺和運(yùn)動(dòng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)，表現(xiàn)為一種簡(jiǎn)單、直觀的方式，本身具有可以直接理解的概念結(jié)構(gòu)。我們發(fā)現(xiàn)此種分析方法對(duì)意象圖式的復(fù)雜性及在其它因素的介入上認(rèn)識(shí)不夠，選取的意象圖式過于靜態(tài)、單一，因此缺乏研究深度。另一方面，意象圖式通過隱喻，實(shí)現(xiàn)從現(xiàn)實(shí)物理感知映射到抽象領(lǐng)域。這種分析方法多關(guān)注意象圖式與隱喻的互動(dòng)，忽視了意象圖式與ICM其它模式的互動(dòng)，并以此形成復(fù)雜概念來實(shí)現(xiàn)語(yǔ)篇整體性。 針對(duì)以上分析方法的缺陷，本文在以下方面做出補(bǔ)充與拓展。同一語(yǔ)篇中意象圖式并非以單一的方式存在，它常涉及多個(gè)意象圖式疊加互動(dòng)，并以此形成復(fù)合意象圖式，加之文化、情境等因素的參與形成更為復(fù)雜的意象圖式，這些都會(huì)影響語(yǔ)篇連貫性。我們把這些圖式稱為拓展意象圖式，其中包括復(fù)合意象圖式文化意象圖式和情境意象圖式，并分別探討它們?cè)谡Z(yǔ)篇連貫中的作用。意象圖式作為ICM中最基本模型，它基于感知經(jīng)驗(yàn)，是人們從時(shí)空中得到并把它應(yīng)用于構(gòu)建其它更為復(fù)雜抽象的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，與以往研究語(yǔ)篇連貫時(shí)多注重探討意象圖式與隱喻互動(dòng)不同的是，，本文將全面系統(tǒng)探究意象圖式與ICM中各個(gè)模型的互動(dòng)與運(yùn)作，通過構(gòu)建命題模型、操作隱喻模型、激活轉(zhuǎn)喻模型來實(shí)現(xiàn)語(yǔ)篇連貫。 本文試圖提出一個(gè)相對(duì)完整的意象圖式理論框架用以闡釋語(yǔ)篇的連貫問題，為認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)與功能語(yǔ)言學(xué)的互補(bǔ)性研究提供了一個(gè)值得參考的切入點(diǎn)。目的在于對(duì)意象圖式本身進(jìn)行理論推演，深化我們對(duì)語(yǔ)篇連貫的本質(zhì)以及其運(yùn)作機(jī)制的認(rèn)識(shí)。
[Abstract]:As a complex linguistic phenomenon, coherence has always been the focus of linguists. It originates from rhetoric and is an important prerequisite for the unity of discourse. Nowadays coherence has become an important research object in discourse analysis. Coherence is a complex linguistic phenomenon involving semantic pragmatic and cognitive aspects. With the deepening of understanding of discourse and the rapid rise of cognitive linguistics more and more attention has been paid to interpreting text coherence from a cognitive perspective in recent years. In terms of research, most scholars are keen to study text coherence from the perspective of text itself or through metaphor. The research perspective chosen in this paper is image schema. An overview of previous studies on image schema and discourse coherence is based on two aspects: on the one hand, image schemata are based on different feelings and motion experiences, and are expressed in a simple and intuitive way. Itself has a conceptual structure that can be directly understood. We find that the complexity of image schema and the involvement of other factors are not well understood by this analysis method, and the selected image schema is too static and single, so it lacks the depth of research. On the other hand, image schema maps from physical perception to abstract field through metaphor. This method pays more attention to the interaction between image schema and metaphor, neglects the interaction between image schema and ICM other models, and forms complex concepts to realize text integrity. In view of the defects of the above analysis methods, this paper supplements and expands on the following aspects. The image schema in the same text does not exist in a single way. It often involves the superposition and interaction of multiple image schemas, and forms a complex image schema with the participation of the factors such as culture, situation and so on. All this will affect the coherence of the text. We refer to these schemas as extended image schemas, including complex image schemas. Cultural image schema and situational image schema are discussed respectively. As the most basic model in ICM, image schema is based on perceptual experience, which is derived from time and space and applied to construct other more complex and abstract experiences. Different from the previous researches on discourse coherence, this paper will explore the interaction and operation of image schema and each model in ICM, and construct a propositional model to operate the metaphorical model. The metonymy model is activated to achieve textual coherence. This paper attempts to present a relatively complete framework of image schema theory to explain the coherence of discourse, which provides a useful starting point for the study of the complementarity between cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. The purpose is to deduce the image schema itself and deepen our understanding of the nature of discourse coherence and its operational mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：魯東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H052

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 熊學(xué)亮;語(yǔ)言的ICM和語(yǔ)言研究的ICM[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

2 張德祿;語(yǔ)篇連貫與語(yǔ)篇的信息結(jié)構(gòu)——論語(yǔ)篇連貫的條件[J];外語(yǔ)研究;1992年03期

3 王寅;;認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)與語(yǔ)篇連貫研究——八論語(yǔ)言的體驗(yàn)性:語(yǔ)篇連貫的認(rèn)知基礎(chǔ)[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2006年06期

4 王寅;語(yǔ)篇連貫的認(rèn)知世界分析方法——體驗(yàn)哲學(xué)和認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)對(duì)語(yǔ)篇連貫性的解釋[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2005年04期

5 苗興偉;;語(yǔ)篇分析的進(jìn)展與前沿[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2006年01期

6 李福印;;意象圖式理論[J];四川外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

7 盧衛(wèi)中;路云;;語(yǔ)篇銜接與連貫的認(rèn)知機(jī)制[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2006年01期

8 張德祿;語(yǔ)篇連貫與語(yǔ)篇的非結(jié)構(gòu)性組織形式——論語(yǔ)篇連貫的條件[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1993年03期

9 李佳;蔡金亭;;認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)角度的英語(yǔ)空間介詞習(xí)得研究[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);2008年02期

10 朱永生;試論語(yǔ)篇連貫的內(nèi)部條件(下)[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);1997年01期

本文編號(hào)：2066290