本文選題：自嘲 + 語用元素　； 參考：《長沙理工大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：自嘲，作為生活中有效的交際工具之一，能夠調(diào)節(jié)交際氣氛，減輕精神壓力，同時也能修復(fù)人際關(guān)系，在社會活動中起著重大作用。目前，國內(nèi)的自嘲研究大多是從社會交際和文學(xué)賞析角度展開，主要涉及自嘲的交際功能以及文學(xué)作品中所隱含的自嘲意識等。這些研究豐富了自嘲話語的研究成果，提供了寶貴的素材，但也存在不足之處：這些研究多集中于自嘲的社會交際價值，忽視了自嘲的產(chǎn)生和理解機制。本文旨在運用乖訛論、關(guān)聯(lián)理論在認知語用框架內(nèi)對“自嘲”的社會交際價值及語用實質(zhì)進行分析，重點關(guān)注自嘲的語用元素以及產(chǎn)生和理解機制，意在為自嘲話語的研究開辟一條新的思路，以及更好的運用和解讀自嘲話語。 全文共分為四章。第一章回顧了自嘲和乖訛論的文獻綜述，重點介紹了乖訛論的歷史發(fā)展過程，以及有關(guān)模式及應(yīng)用。第二章從語用視角對自嘲話語做了進一步研究，分別探討了自嘲的界定、分類和限制條件，并著重探討了自嘲的語用特征、表達方式和語用功能。第三章運用乖訛論闡釋了自嘲的產(chǎn)生機制。該部分首先引入了表征概念，然后由表征、乖訛和自嘲話語三者關(guān)系展開討論。由三者的關(guān)系分析得出：自嘲話語的心理表征和語言表征具有不對稱性，直接表現(xiàn)為交際意圖與信息意圖的不一致性，最終呈現(xiàn)出自嘲語用效果的差異性。第四章運用乖訛論和關(guān)聯(lián)理論闡釋自嘲的理解過程。由于乖訛論重在突顯事物的不和諧因素，從而改變信息的構(gòu)建，但在具體分析受眾接受和理解自嘲話語上，其解釋力不是很具體清晰，而關(guān)聯(lián)理論在分析受眾的理解和加工過程，具有很強的解釋力。筆者認為，乖訛論和關(guān)聯(lián)理論可以互補，兩者相結(jié)合能更有效地闡釋自嘲的加工理解過程�；陉P(guān)聯(lián)理論，在自嘲話語理解過程中，受眾理解自嘲需要付出額外的加工努力，同時也獲得了由心理期待撲空到情感郁積驟然釋放的獨特體驗。 基于以上研究，本文得出以下幾點結(jié)論：1、自嘲作為一種語用行為，，其突出的語用特點主要表現(xiàn)在以下四點：乖訛性，相對排他性，間接性和逆期待性；其表達方式包括忿斷、轉(zhuǎn)移、干涉、降格和口誤；其限制條件主要為話語的模糊性和說話人的非真誠性以及命題的相對真實性；其功能表現(xiàn)出多樣性。2、在自嘲的產(chǎn)生和理解過程中，自嘲話語的心理表征和語言表征具有不對稱性，直接表現(xiàn)為交際意圖與信息意圖的不一致性。受眾推出的交際意圖與愿意圖是否匹配，將會產(chǎn)生三種結(jié)果：1)如果兩者完全匹配，則為完全或充分的自嘲效果。2)如果兩者部分匹配，則為部分自嘲效果。3）如果兩者不匹配，則為交際失敗。3、受眾在理解自嘲話語事，需要付出額外的加工努力，從而獲得額外認知效果，其表現(xiàn)為受眾由一種心理期待撲空到情感郁積驟然釋放的獨特體驗。4、自嘲話語經(jīng)歷了一個由外在表現(xiàn)形式不和諧到最終交際和諧的過程，其話語的產(chǎn)生和理解是同步進行的。
[Abstract]:Self mockery, as one of the effective communication tools in life, can regulate the atmosphere of communication, lighten the mental pressure, and can also repair the interpersonal relationship and play a significant role in the social activities. At present, the domestic self mockery is mostly from the angle of social communication and literary appreciation, mainly involving the self mocking communicative function and the literary works. These studies enrich the research results of self mockery and provide valuable material, but there are also shortcomings: these studies focus on self mocking social communication values, ignore the generation and understanding of self mockery. This article aims to use the theory of incongruity, the theory of relevance in the cognitive pragmatic framework of "self mockery". The social value and pragmatic essence of social communication are analyzed, focusing on the pragmatic elements of self mockery and the mechanism of production and understanding. It is intended to open up a new idea for the study of self mocking discourse and to better use and interpret the self mockery discourse.
The full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter reviews the literature review of self mockery and incongruity theory, focuses on the historical development of the theory of incongruity, and the related models and applications. The second chapter makes a further study of self mockery from the pragmatic perspective, and discusses the definition, classification and restriction conditions of self mockery, and focuses on the discussion of the self mockery of the pragmatic special. The third chapter uses the theory of incongruity to explain the production mechanism of self mockery. This part first introduces the concept of representation, and then discusses the relationship between the three aspects of the representation, the incongruity and the self mocking discourse. From the analysis of the relationship between the three, the psychological and linguistic representations of the self mocking discourse are asymmetrical and are directly represented by the three. The inconsistency between the intention and the information intention shows the difference in the effect of the mockery. The fourth chapter explains the understanding process of self mockery using the theory of incongruity and the theory of relevance. The force is not very specific and clear, and the relevance theory has a strong explanatory power in the analysis of the understanding and processing of the audience. The author thinks that the theory of incongruity and relevance can be complementation, and the combination of the two can more effectively explain the process of self mockery. Based on the theory of relevance, the audience needs to pay for self mockery in the process of self mocking speech understanding. Extra processing effort has also gained a unique experience from psychological expectations to sudden release of emotional stasis.
Based on the above studies, this paper draws the following conclusions: 1, as a pragmatic act, self mockery is characterized by the following four points: incongruity, relative exclusiveness, indirect and anticipatory expectation; its expression includes wrath, transfer, interference, lowering and falsivity, and its limitation is mainly the fuzziness of discourse and The non sincerity of the speaker and the relative authenticity of the propositions; its function shows the diversity of.2. In the process of self mockery, the psychological and linguistic representations of self mocking discourse have asymmetry, which directly shows the inconsistency between the communicative intention and the information intention. Three results will be produced: 1) if the two are fully matched, it is a complete or full self mockery effect.2) if the two are partially matched, it is part of the self mockery effect.3) if the two do not match, it is a communicative failure.3, and the audience needs to pay extra processing effort to understand the self mockery, thus obtaining additional cognitive effect, which is shown to be the audience. A unique experience,.4, from a psychological expectation to a sudden release of emotional depression, has experienced a process of discord from external expression to final communication and harmony, and the production and understanding of its discourse are carried out synchronously.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長沙理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H030

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李小敏;涂靖;;文學(xué)作品中玩笑話語的認知語用研究[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年06期

2 孫國蘭;劉萍;;論英語言語交際中“自嘲”策略的動機[J];東莞理工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年06期

3 杜希宙;;調(diào)侃簡論[J];衡水學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年04期

4 李勇忠,李春華;框架轉(zhuǎn)換與意義建構(gòu)[J];外語學(xué)刊;2004年03期

5 曲衛(wèi)國;也評“關(guān)聯(lián)理論”[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;1993年02期

6 冉永平;語用過程中的認知語境及其語用制約[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2000年08期

7 徐盛桓;常規(guī)關(guān)系與認知化——再論常規(guī)關(guān)系[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報);2002年01期

8 童華池;;“自嘲”難“嘲”[J];語文學(xué)習(xí);2005年Z1期

本文編號：2064937