本文選題：《毛傳》 + 植物名�。� 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：《詩經(jīng)》是我國第一部詩歌總集，收錄了上起西周初年下迄春秋時期五百多年的詩歌。其中記載的內(nèi)容具有豐富的研究價值，無數(shù)學(xué)者對其進(jìn)行過各方面的研究。在訓(xùn)詁方面，西漢毛亨所著《毛詩故訓(xùn)傳》是我國現(xiàn)存最早，體例最完備，對后世影響最大的一部詩經(jīng)傳注。它體例完備，創(chuàng)造了很多義例，釋詞簡單精要，注重實(shí)證考據(jù)，是“詩經(jīng)漢學(xué)”里程碑意義的著作。對于《詩經(jīng)》的名物研究，相關(guān)論著已經(jīng)頗豐，但對于《毛傳》的研究，多在其注疏及名物考證方面，其中也涉及一些訓(xùn)釋方面的理論，但比較零散，不成系統(tǒng)。所以本文擬從詞語訓(xùn)釋的角度對《毛傳》植物名進(jìn)行深入系統(tǒng)的研究。 本文的研究內(nèi)容主要有以下幾個方面： 一、對于《毛傳》中訓(xùn)釋的植物詞進(jìn)行類別劃分，對某些存在爭議的植物進(jìn)行歸類辯證。首先，對《毛傳》中的草類和木類植物按植物的功能和屬性進(jìn)行分類，有多種功能的按其主要功能歸類。擬草類劃分為七類，木類分為三類。然后對《毛傳》中出現(xiàn)的與其它各家產(chǎn)生爭議的植物通過綜合比較分析，得出結(jié)論 二、對《毛傳》中的植物名訓(xùn)釋從詞訓(xùn)和語訓(xùn)的角度進(jìn)行分析。擬從同義訓(xùn)釋、描述式訓(xùn)釋、綜合訓(xùn)釋這三個方面對《毛傳》中的植物名訓(xùn)釋進(jìn)行詳細(xì)介紹。在詞義訓(xùn)釋里既有概念義的訓(xùn)釋，也有語境義的訓(xùn)釋，本章將會對此進(jìn)行論述。 三、對《毛傳》中的植物名訓(xùn)釋的文化涵義進(jìn)行解釋。從植物的功能、顏色、味道、氣味、形態(tài)、生長習(xí)慣、品性幾個方面對《毛傳》訓(xùn)釋中的文化內(nèi)涵追根溯源，找出依據(jù)。 最后，，對《毛傳》植物名訓(xùn)釋的成就與不足進(jìn)行總結(jié)。魯人毛亨生于戰(zhàn)國末期，師授儒家一代大師荀子，繼承了孔門詩學(xué)體系，秉承孔門嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)家風(fēng)；他博覽古籍，博學(xué)多才，吸收各家精華，去其虛妄，在前人訓(xùn)詁成果的基礎(chǔ)上，形成一套較為完備的訓(xùn)詁體系�！睹珎鳌肥窍惹刂燎貪h之際訓(xùn)詁的集大成者。然由于時代和階級的局限，《毛傳》訓(xùn)釋中也有缺點(diǎn)和不足，但瑕不掩瑜，它不愧是一部劃時代的經(jīng)典。
[Abstract]:The Book of songs is the first collection of poems in China, which includes more than 500 years from the beginning of the Western Zhou Dynasty to the Spring and Autumn period. The recorded content has rich research value, and numerous scholars have studied it in all aspects. In the aspect of exegesis, Mao Heng's "the Book of songs" by Mao Heng in the Western Han Dynasty is one of the earliest extant poems in China, which has the most complete style and has the greatest influence on later generations. Its style is complete, it has created a lot of semantic examples, the explanation of ci is simple and refined, and it pays attention to empirical textual research, which is a landmark work in the Book of songs and Sinology. For the study of famous objects in the Book of songs, there have been a lot of related works, but for the study of Mao Zhuan, most of them involve some theories of explanation and explanation, but they are scattered and unsystematic. Therefore, this paper intends to make a deep and systematic study on the plant names from the perspective of lexical explanation. The main contents of this paper are as follows: Firstly, the plant words in Mao Zhuan are classified, and some controversial plants are classified and dialectically. Firstly, the grass and wood plants are classified according to their functions and attributes, and the plants with many functions are classified according to their main functions. Grass is divided into seven categories, wood is divided into three categories. Then through the comprehensive comparative analysis of the plants in Mao Biography and other controversial plants, the conclusion is drawn. Second, the explanation of plant names in Mao Zhuan is analyzed from the angle of word training and language training. In this paper, the plant names in Mao Zhuan are introduced in detail from three aspects: synonymous explanation, descriptive explanation and comprehensive explanation. There are both conceptual and contextual explanations in the explanation of word meaning, which will be discussed in this chapter. Third, explain the cultural meaning of plant name explanation in Mao Biography. From the function, color, taste, smell, morphology, growth habit and character of the plant, the root of the cultural connotation in the interpretation of "Mao Biography" is traced back to find out the basis. Finally, the achievements and shortcomings of plant name explanation are summarized. Born in the late warring States period, Mao-heng of Lu was born in the late warring States period. Xunzi, a master of Confucianism, inherited the Confucian poetics system and inherited the rigorous style of Confucius. He reviewed ancient books, learned many talents, absorbed the essence of various schools, and eliminated their falsehood, on the basis of the results of previous exegesis. A complete exegesis system was formed. Mao Zhuan was the epitome of exegesis from pre Qin to Qin and Han dynasties. However, due to the limitations of the times and classes, there are shortcomings and shortcomings in the interpretation of Mao Zhuan, but it is a epoch-making classic.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H131

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 閆艷;《漢語大詞典》蔬菜詞語補(bǔ)正二則[J];古漢語研究;2001年02期

2 胡繼明;《毛傳》與《爾雅·釋訓(xùn)》[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;1996年03期

3 王承略;《毛詩故訓(xùn)傳》標(biāo)“興”含義新解[J];晉陽學(xué)刊;2003年03期

4 祝敏徹;尚春生;;論“毛傳”、“鄭箋”的異同[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1983年01期

5 王建莉;;《爾雅》異名理據(jù)的特征[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年06期

6 王寧;;《詩經(jīng)》中的幾種植物考[J];西安文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2006年06期

本文編號：1983560