本文選題：動詞復(fù)制句 + 分類　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文旨在探討漢語動詞復(fù)制句。動詞復(fù)制句指的是一個簡單句中含有兩個相同的動詞，分別帶上賓語和補語。 以往的研究者分別從句法層面探討動詞復(fù)制句的生成機制，或從語義層面論述其結(jié)構(gòu)特征及語義特點。本文嘗試結(jié)合句法和語義兩個層面重新探討動詞復(fù)制句，以求解決以下問題：1）動詞復(fù)制句的構(gòu)成條件；2）動詞復(fù)制強制性和選擇性的構(gòu)成條件；3）VP_2后面時間、頻度短語的句法地位；4）動詞復(fù)制句生成過程及V_1和V_2的句法地位。 針對上述第一個問題，基于Hoekstra (1990,1992)提出的事件類型，我們認(rèn)為只有動詞所表現(xiàn)的事件活動可以重復(fù)和延續(xù)，其事件類型為no-telic時，，才能夠成動詞復(fù)制句。 關(guān)于第二個問題，本文將動詞復(fù)制句重新分為結(jié)果性動詞復(fù)制句和描述性動詞復(fù)制句，其區(qū)別在于VP_2是否為VP1提供活動的結(jié)點。結(jié)果性“得”字動詞復(fù)制句中，VP_2為VP1提供動作的結(jié)點，表示動作的完成，因此動詞需要復(fù)制。描述性“得”字動詞復(fù)制句中，VP_2只對VP1活動的情態(tài)性質(zhì)進(jìn)行語義描寫，不表示動作的完成，因此動詞并非一定復(fù)制。 關(guān)于第三個問題，根據(jù)黃正德（1994）修正的題元層級性理論，我們認(rèn)為：一方面，不能形成“無指賓語+補語”的句子，但能形成有指賓語+補語的句子。另一方面，補語+賓語可以投射為一個更大的名詞短語,形成補語+無指/有指賓語的句子。由此，我們更深地解釋了含時間或頻度補語時動詞復(fù)制的可選性，也得出動詞復(fù)制句強制性和可選性的選擇與其分類無關(guān)。 關(guān)于動詞復(fù)制句的生成，我們將結(jié)果性“得”和“了”看做體標(biāo)記詞,相當(dāng)于英語中的曲折語素，它們具有依附動詞的特征，動詞復(fù)制既滿足了表示完成體態(tài)的“得”和“了”能夠在句中實現(xiàn)，又滿足了動詞對賓語DP的特征核查。因此，我們認(rèn)為V_1為復(fù)制動詞，V_2為源動詞，但V_2只是為了實現(xiàn)曲折語素的語音形式，并無實質(zhì)性的語義內(nèi)涵。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to probe into Chinese verb duplicated sentences. A verb replica refers to a simple sentence that contains two identical verbs, with objects and complements, respectively. Previous researchers have explored the mechanism of verb replication from syntactic level, or discussed its structural and semantic characteristics from the semantic level. This paper attempts to re-explore the verb replicative sentence at the syntactic and semantic levels in order to solve the following problem: 1) the composition condition of the verb replicative sentence / 2) the mandatory and selective composition condition of the verb replicative sentence. The syntactic status of frequent phrases and the syntactic status of VSTs 1 and VSP 2. In view of the above first question, based on the type of events proposed by Hoekstra / 1990 / 1992, we think that only the event activities represented by verbs can be repeated and continued, and only when the event type is no-telic, can the verb be duplicated. On the second question, this paper redivides the verb replicative sentence into the resultant verb replicative sentence and the descriptive verb replicative sentence. The difference lies in whether VP_2 provides the node of activity for VP1. In the verb replication sentence of resultant word "de", VPs2 provides the node of action for VP1, indicating the completion of action, so the verb needs to be duplicated. The descriptive "de" verb replicating sentence only describes the modal nature of the VP1 activity, but does not mean the completion of the action, so the verb is not necessarily duplicated. With regard to the third question, according to Huang Zhengde's theory of meta-hierarchy revised in 1994, we think that on the one hand, we can not form a sentence with "no object complement", but can form a sentence with a reference to an object complement. On the other hand, a complement object can be projected into a larger noun phrase to form a sentence with a complement without a finger or a reference object. Therefore, we further explain the selectability of verb replication with time or frequency complement, and conclude that the choice of mandatory and optional verb replicative sentence is independent of its classification. As for the generation of verb replicative sentences, we regard the resultant "get" and "have" as aspect markers, which are equivalent to the tortuous morphemes in English, and they have the characteristics of dependent verbs. Verb replication not only satisfies the realization of "de" and "already" in the sentence, but also satisfies the verification of the verb's feature of object DP. Therefore, we think that V _ S _ 1 is a replica verb and V _ 2 is a source verb, but V _ S _ 2 is only intended to realize the phonetic form of tortuous morpheme, and has no substantive semantic connotation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李訥,石毓智;漢語動詞拷貝結(jié)構(gòu)的演化過程[J];國外語言學(xué);1997年03期

2 楊玉玲;重動句研究綜述[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2004年03期

3 戴耀晶;試說漢語重動句的語法價值[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1998年02期

4 楊玉玲;;重動句和“把”字句的使用考察[J];世界漢語教學(xué);1999年02期

5 唐翠菊;;現(xiàn)代漢語重動句的分類[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2001年01期

6 楊壽勛;再論漢語中的動詞復(fù)制[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2000年04期

7 楊壽勛;“得”的生成語法研究[J];現(xiàn)代外語;1998年01期

8 王紅旗;動結(jié)式述補結(jié)構(gòu)在把字句和重動句中的分布[J];語文研究;2001年01期

9 黃月圓;;把/被結(jié)構(gòu)與動詞重復(fù)結(jié)構(gòu)的互補分布現(xiàn)象[J];中國語文;1996年02期

10 項開喜;;漢語重動句式的功能研究[J];中國語文;1997年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫紅玲;現(xiàn)代漢語重動句研究[D];北京語言大學(xué);2005年

本文編號：1953852