本文選題：時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在” + 語(yǔ)體差別�。� 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文重在對(duì)時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在”進(jìn)行優(yōu)先序列研究,優(yōu)先序列研究是建立在數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)基礎(chǔ)上的定量分析,通過(guò)對(duì)語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象的充分描寫(xiě)和觀察,對(duì)形成的優(yōu)先序列做出合理的解釋。 本文主要內(nèi)容包括： 第一章考察時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在”的使用情況及優(yōu)先序列。在不區(qū)分語(yǔ)體的情況下對(duì)全部語(yǔ)料進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)時(shí)間副詞“在”的使用頻率最高,優(yōu)先序列為(“＞”表示“優(yōu)先于”)“在正正在”。 第二章討論時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在”的語(yǔ)體差別及優(yōu)先序列。把語(yǔ)料分為口頭語(yǔ)體、科技語(yǔ)體、文藝語(yǔ)體、政論語(yǔ)體、事務(wù)語(yǔ)體五部分,觀察時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在”在不同語(yǔ)體中的使用情況,發(fā)現(xiàn)在口頭語(yǔ)體、文藝語(yǔ)體、科技語(yǔ)體中“在”的使用頻率最高,優(yōu)先序列為“在正正在”,在政論語(yǔ)體中“正在”的使用頻率最高,在事務(wù)語(yǔ)體中三個(gè)時(shí)間副詞幾乎不出現(xiàn)。 第三章討論時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在”與“著”、“呢”的共現(xiàn)情況及優(yōu)先序列。通過(guò)對(duì)時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在”和“著”、“呢”共現(xiàn)情況的描寫(xiě)及對(duì)語(yǔ)料的統(tǒng)計(jì),發(fā)現(xiàn)時(shí)間副詞“正”更傾向跟“著”、“呢”共現(xiàn),優(yōu)先序列為“正在正在”。 第四章討論時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在”和“V/VP”組配的優(yōu)先序列。分別考察時(shí)間副詞“正”、“正在”、“在”和不同類型動(dòng)詞V、動(dòng)詞短語(yǔ)VP的組配情況,找出組配時(shí)的傾向性,把這種傾向性通過(guò)具體數(shù)據(jù)表現(xiàn)出來(lái)。發(fā)現(xiàn)“正”、“正在”、“在”傾向跟活動(dòng)動(dòng)詞和終結(jié)動(dòng)詞組配,不常跟狀態(tài)動(dòng)詞和瞬間終結(jié)動(dòng)詞組配；傾向跟動(dòng)賓短語(yǔ)和狀中式動(dòng)詞短語(yǔ)組配,不常跟兼語(yǔ)短語(yǔ)組配。 第五章本文的結(jié)論和不足之處。通過(guò)優(yōu)先序列考察發(fā)現(xiàn)“正”、“正在”、“在”最大的使用差別在于“正”、“在”和“正在”是語(yǔ)體上的差別,而“正”和“正在”、“在’是自足性上的差別,“正”所在的小句傾向于不自足。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the study of the priority sequence of the time adverbs "positive", "being" and "in". The priority sequence study is a quantitative analysis based on data statistics, through the full description and observation of linguistic phenomena. Make a reasonable explanation of the priority sequence formed. The main contents of this paper are as follows: The first chapter examines the use and priority sequence of time adverbs "Zheng", "is" and "you". Through the statistical analysis of all the corpus without distinguishing the language style, it is found that the time adverb "Ze" is the most frequently used, and the priority sequence is (">" means "first over") "is in positive". Chapter two discusses the stylistic differences and priority sequences of time adverbs "Zheng", "is" and "you". The corpus is divided into five parts: oral style, scientific and technical style, literary style, political theory style, business style, observing the use of time adverbs "Zheng", "being", "in different styles", and finding out that they are used in colloquial style, literary style, etc. The frequency of "Zai" is the highest in the scientific and technological style, the priority sequence is "in the positive being", the "is" in the political style is the highest, and the three time adverbs almost do not appear in the transaction style. Chapter three discusses the co-occurrence and priority sequence of time adverbs "Zheng", "is", "Zai" and "Zhe". By describing the co-occurrence of time adverbs "positive", "being", "Zhe" and "er" and statistics on the corpus, it is found that the time adverb "positive" is more inclined to co-appear with "Zhe", "er" is co-occurring, and the priority sequence is "being". Chapter 4 discusses the priority sequence of time adverbs "Zheng", "is", "Zu" and "V/VP". This paper investigates the combination of time adverbs "positive", "being", "in" and different types of verbs Vand verb phrase VP, finds out the tendency of matching time, and displays this tendency through concrete data. It is found that "positive", "being" and "Zai" tend to match with active verbs and terminative verbs, but not with state verbs and instantaneous terminative verbs, and tend to match with verb-object phrases and Chinese verb phrases, not with concurrent phrases. Chapter 5 the conclusion and deficiency of this paper. It is found that "positive", "being", "being" and "in" are stylistic differences between "positive", "being" and "being", while "positive" and "being" are differences in self-sufficiency. The clause "Zheng" tends to be unself-sufficient.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H146.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白兆麟;;語(yǔ)法研究應(yīng)當(dāng)重視語(yǔ)法體系的總格局——從通行的“詞綴說(shuō)”談起[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1991年03期

2 朱德熙;現(xiàn)代書(shū)面漢語(yǔ)里的虛化動(dòng)詞和名動(dòng)詞 為第一屆國(guó)際漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)討論會(huì)而作[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1985年05期

3 尚來(lái)彬;;“正”、“在”、“著”、“呢”連用共現(xiàn)與活動(dòng)動(dòng)詞及其短語(yǔ)的搭配[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

4 陶紅印;試論語(yǔ)體分類的語(yǔ)法學(xué)意義[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);1999年03期

5 馮雪冬;;近代漢語(yǔ)時(shí)間副詞研究現(xiàn)狀[J];大眾文藝;2010年23期

6 伊原大策,柴世森;表示進(jìn)行時(shí)態(tài)的“在”[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1986年03期

7 尚來(lái)彬;鮑俊林;;“正、在、著、呢”與時(shí)間狀語(yǔ)搭配探析[J];黑龍江史志;2009年15期

8 金奉民;助詞“著”的基本語(yǔ)法意義[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1991年04期

9 錢乃榮;體助詞“著”不表示“進(jìn)行”意義[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2000年04期

10 石毓智;;論漢語(yǔ)的進(jìn)行體范疇[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2006年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王文格;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)形謂句優(yōu)先序列研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2009年

2 肖任飛;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)因果復(fù)句優(yōu)先序列研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2009年

3 程書(shū)秋;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)多項(xiàng)式定中短語(yǔ)優(yōu)先序列研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李薇;漢語(yǔ)體標(biāo)記“正在”和“著”的比較研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1936677