本文選題：定中標記 + 優(yōu)勢組配�。� 參考：《華中師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：定中標記“的”與“之”都是漢語中出現(xiàn)頻率很高的結構助詞。其中,前者在現(xiàn)代漢語中的基本功用是當定語,用在定中短語的修飾語與中心語之間的一個輔助性連接成分；而后者是從古代漢語中遺留下來,帶有一定文言色彩的特殊結構助詞,也主要用于定中短語。雖然“的”與“之”具有相同的語法功能,但是它們之間仍存在較大的差異,在相同句法環(huán)境中呈現(xiàn)出互補分布：前附助詞“的”的使用較為自由,適用于各種文體和場合,且后面多跟雙音節(jié)中心語；后附助詞“之”的使用則受到一定的限制,適用于比較文雅的語體,且后面多跟單音節(jié)中心語。同時,“的”與“之”各自的中心語分析中都存在括號悖論,即句法結構和語音結構之間具有不一致性。本文在前人研究基礎上對定中標記“的”與“之”進行對比考察,在廣泛搜集語料的前提下,揭示兩者在句法結構和語音結構之間存在括號悖論,以及不同的黏附方向和語體差異所造成的不同韻律效應,并最終嘗試運用漢語韻律語法理論解釋這種語言現(xiàn)象。全文共包括四個部分： 第一部分：明確研究對象和意義,主要概括定中標記“的”與“之”的相關研究現(xiàn)狀,對思路、方法和語料來源作出說明。 第二部分：主要考察定中標記“的”與雙音節(jié)中心語的優(yōu)勢組配,包括中心語為固化詞、中心語前有修飾語,并兼顧考察“的”與單音節(jié)中心語的自由組配和非自由組配、“的”與多音節(jié)專名短語和成語的搭配情況。最后揭示“的”字短語中心語分析存在括號悖論。 第三部分：主要考察定中標記“之”與單音節(jié)中心語的優(yōu)勢組配,包括“之”字構成的非標準四字格、“之X”詞匯化的不同層級,并兼顧考察“之”與雙音節(jié)中心語的搭配情況、“之”在“非白不文”文體中與多音節(jié)中心語的搭配情況。最后揭示“之”字短語中心語分析存在括號悖論。 第四部分：在前文語言現(xiàn)象描寫的基礎上,揭示定中標記“的”與“之”由于不同的黏附方向造成了不同的韻律性質和韻律結構,即“的”在句法結構上后附而在語音結構上前附,“之”在句法結構上前附而在語音結構上后附；正是由于不同的黏附方向和語體差異,“的”后多跟雙音節(jié)中心語而“之”后多跟單音節(jié)中心語。最后,文章考察在相同韻律環(huán)境中“的”、“之”可替換時表現(xiàn)出的語用價值的差異。
[Abstract]:The "and" of the centroid mark are both structural auxiliaries with high frequency in Chinese. Among them, the basic skill of the former in modern Chinese is an auxiliary link between the modifier and the head of the fixed Chinese phrase, while the latter is left over from the ancient Chinese. Special structural auxiliaries with a certain classical Chinese color are also mainly used for middle phrases. Although they have the same grammatical functions, there are still great differences between them, and there is a complementary distribution in the same syntactic environment: the auxiliary words are used more freely and can be used in various styles and situations. The use of the auxiliary word "Zhi" is restricted, which is suitable for the more elegant style and followed by the monosyllabic central language. At the same time, there is a contradiction between the syntactic structure and the phonetic structure in the analysis of their respective central words. On the basis of previous studies, this paper makes a contrastive study on the "and" of the central marker, and reveals the existence of parenthesis paradox between the syntactic structure and the phonetic structure under the premise of extensive data collection. And the different prosodic effects caused by different adhesion directions and stylistic differences, and finally try to use Chinese prosodic grammar theory to explain this linguistic phenomenon. The thesis consists of four parts: The first part: make clear the research object and significance, mainly generalize the related research status of "and", explain the ideas, methods and the source of the corpus. In the second part, the author mainly studies the advantage combination of "centroid" and "disyllabic center", including that the central word is a solidified word, that there is a modifier before the central word, and that "the centrogram" has a free combination with the monosyllabic central word and a non-free combination with the monosyllabic center. Collocation with polysyllabic proper name phrases and idioms. Finally, it is revealed that there is a parenthesis paradox in the analysis of the central word phrase. The third part mainly studies the advantage combination of the central marker "s" and the monosyllabic center, including the non-standard four-character case of "Zhi", the different levels of "X" lexicalization. It also investigates the collocation of "Zhi" with dicyllabic head and the collocation of polysyllabic core in "non-white intext". Finally, it is revealed that there is a parenthesis paradox in the analysis of the "Zhi" word phrase. The fourth part: on the basis of the description of the phenomena in the preceding language, it is revealed that the "and" in the middle mark have different prosodic properties and prosodic structures due to different adhesion directions. That is, the syntactic structure is appended to the syntactic structure, the phonetic structure is attached to the syntactic structure, and the phonetic structure is followed by the syntactic structure. It follows the double syllable center and the monosyllabic center. Finally, the paper examines the differences in pragmatic values when the "," and "the" can be replaced in the same prosodic environment.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 馬國良;談“之字結構”[J];河北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1986年04期

2 張冰;;論《馬氏文通》的介字“之”[J];湖北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年03期

3 張玉金;;出土戰(zhàn)國文獻中助詞“之”的研究[J];華南師范大學學報(社會科學版);2008年04期

4 倪婭嵐;;《論語》“之”字研究[J];和田師范專科學校學報;2011年02期

5 莊會彬;劉振前;;“的”的韻律語法研究[J];漢語學習;2012年03期

6 王茂林;漢語自然話語韻律組塊的優(yōu)選論分析[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年04期

7 孫德金;;現(xiàn)代漢語書面語中文言語法成分的界定問題[J];漢語學習;2012年06期

8 趙廷琛;文言“之”和口語“的”的區(qū)別——兼論“之”的詞性[J];齊魯學刊;1986年02期

9 王育新;之字結構[J];齊齊哈爾師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1987年03期

10 彭家法;;“的”中心語分析中的括號悖論[J];外語教學;2012年03期

，

本文編號：1922389