本文選題：《躋春臺》 + 疑問句��； 參考：《四川師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：《躋春臺》是清末時期一部優(yōu)秀的擬話本小說集，是迄今發(fā)現(xiàn)的規(guī)模最大的近代四川官話的口語材料，其語言有兩個突出特點：一是在語體上文言與白話夾雜，二是大量使用方言俗語�！盾Q春臺》中大量的語言材料，為我們進一步研究四川方言疑問句提供了有力的基礎。 本文將《躋春臺》全書作為一個封閉的系統(tǒng)，從疑問標記（包括反問標記）入手，對書中的疑問句進行窮盡性統(tǒng)計定量定性的分析和詳細的歸納，著重進行共時的描寫研究，并做一定的歷時比較，發(fā)現(xiàn)疑問句的變化，以期大致揭示出四川方言疑問句的規(guī)律性的發(fā)展。本文分為五個部分： 第一部分：緒論。介紹了《躋春臺》這本小說的內(nèi)容和語言特色、版本與�？鼻闆r、研究的歷史與現(xiàn)狀、漢語疑問句的研究概況、本課題的目的和意義以及本文關于疑問句的分類標準。 第二部分：《躋春臺》中詢問句研究。詢問句共有四種格式：是非問句、特指問句、正反問句和選擇問句。依據(jù)特殊疑問標準，將詢問句分為有特殊疑問標記和無特殊疑問標記兩大類。針對每一類問句的研究，從疑問標記入手，，著重分析各類句子的句法、語義以及語用方面的特點。 第三部分：《躋春臺》中反詰問句研究。從表達入手，可以將疑問句分為詢問句和反詰問句。反詰問句在全書疑問句中所占比重很大，幾乎接近一半。其研究方法與詢問句研究方法相同。 第四部分：疑問句的比較研究。分別與同時代的《西蜀方言》中的疑問句做共時比較，與現(xiàn)代四川方言疑問句做歷時比較，梳理出四川方言疑問句從《躋春臺》到現(xiàn)代四川方言的發(fā)展線索。 第五部分：結語。本文對《躋春臺》中疑問句進行全面的歸納總結。
[Abstract]:The imperial spring stage is an excellent collection of fictional novels of the late Qing Dynasty. It is the largest spoken material of modern Sichuan Mandarin found so far. Its language has two outstanding features: first, the combination of classical Chinese and vernacular language in the style of writing. Second, a large number of dialects are used. A large number of language materials in "Jingchun Tai" provide us with a strong foundation for further study of Sichuan dialect interrogative sentences. In this paper, the book is regarded as a closed system, starting with interrogative markers (including counter-questioning markers), the interrogative sentences in the book are analyzed quantitatively and analyzed in detail, with emphasis on synchronic descriptive research. The author makes a diachronic comparison and finds out the changes of interrogative sentences in order to reveal the development of the regularity of interrogative sentences in Sichuan dialect. This paper is divided into five parts: Part one: introduction. This paper introduces the content and language features, edition and collation of the novel, the history and present situation of the study, the general situation of the study of Chinese interrogative sentences, the purpose and significance of this subject, and the classification standard of the interrogative sentences in this paper. The second part: a study of the interrogative sentences in the Royal Spring platform. There are four forms of interrogative sentences: right question, special question, positive question and selective question. According to the standard of special doubt, interrogative sentences are divided into two categories: special interrogative markers and unquestioned markers. This paper focuses on the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic features of each type of question sentence from the perspective of interrogative markers. The third part: a study of rhetorical questions in Royal Spring Station. The interrogative sentence can be divided into interrogative sentence and rhetorical question sentence. Rhetorical questions account for a large proportion of the quizzes in the book, almost half of them. Its research method and interrogative sentence research method are the same. Part four: a comparative study of interrogative sentences. This paper compares the interrogative sentences in the contemporary Xishu dialect with those in modern Sichuan dialects, and combs out the clues of the development of the interrogative sentences in Sichuan dialect from "imperial spring" to "modern Sichuan dialects". Part V: conclusion. This paper sums up the interrogative sentences in Jingchun Tai.
【學位授予單位】：四川師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李思明;;正反選擇問句中否定詞發(fā)展初探[J];安慶師院學報(社會科學版);1984年01期

2 郭錫良;先秦語氣詞新探(二)[J];古漢語研究;1989年01期

3 譚耀炬;《拍案驚奇》的“幾時”[J];古籍整理研究學刊;2000年06期

4 曉杰;;談談疑問句的四種格式[J];南京師范大學文學院學報;1999年13期

5 王穎;;現(xiàn)代漢語疑問句的預設分析[J];青年文學家;2009年08期

6 葉建軍;;測度副詞“敢”、“敢是”的形成及其演化[J];上饒師范學院學報;2007年04期

7 倪蘭;特指問反問句的語用分析及其修辭意義[J];修辭學習;2003年06期

8 許仰民;論《金瓶梅詞話》的疑問句及疑問詞[J];信陽師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1997年01期

9 史金生;;表反問的“不是”[J];中國語文;1997年01期

10 貝羅貝;吳福祥;;上古漢語疑問代詞的發(fā)展與演變[J];中國語文;2000年04期

本文編號：1894865