本文選題：泉州方言 + 否定詞��； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：在已有的研究材料中,人們更多的只是關(guān)注閩南方言否定詞及其相關(guān)句式內(nèi)部的一致性,而忽視了或較少談及閩南方言不同片區(qū)的否定詞及其相關(guān)句式的地域差異性,對閩南方言否定詞及其相關(guān)句式的歷史演變也還沒梳理出明晰的發(fā)展變化過程,至于閩南方言的羨余否定、語用否定等其他否定范疇的研究也都還很薄弱。為此,本文試著以母語泉州方言為立足點(diǎn),運(yùn)用語法化、詞匯化、羨余否定等相關(guān)理論,結(jié)合實(shí)地調(diào)查,較為詳盡地描述泉州方言否定詞及其相關(guān)句式的用法,也探討其歷史來源及虛化過程,并適當(dāng)?shù)貙⑵渑c廈門話和漳州話進(jìn)行比較,以期構(gòu)建一個(gè)較為全面的泉州方言乃至閩南方言否定詞及其相關(guān)句式研究系統(tǒng)。
[Abstract]:In the existing research materials, people only pay more attention to the internal consistency of the negative words and their related sentence patterns in Minnan dialect, but ignore or less talk about the regional differences of negative words and their related sentence patterns in different areas of Minnan dialect. The historical evolution of the negative words and their related sentence patterns in Minnan dialect has not been sorted out clearly, and the researches on other negative categories, such as envious negation, pragmatic negation and so on, are still very weak. Therefore, this paper tries to use the relevant theories of grammaticalization, lexicalization and envious negation to describe in detail the negative words and their related sentence patterns in Quanzhou dialect. It also discusses its historical origin and the process of vacuity, and compares it with Xiamen dialect and Zhangzhou dialect in order to construct a more comprehensive study system of negative words and their related sentence patterns in Quanzhou dialect and Minnan dialect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H177.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 林純;汕頭市區(qū)方言情態(tài)系統(tǒng)研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1871304