本文選題：隱喻 + 概念隱喻　； 參考：《東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：學(xué)者們過(guò)去認(rèn)為隱喻只是一種修辭方式,而1980年由著名學(xué)者萊考夫和約翰遜出版的《我們賴(lài)以生存的隱喻》加速了對(duì)隱喻的研究。萊考夫和約翰遜認(rèn)為隱喻不僅僅是一種修辭手段,而且是一種重要的認(rèn)知工具,對(duì)我們創(chuàng)造及理解思維和語(yǔ)言起了重要的作用。隱喻普遍存在于我們的日常生活中。它不僅存在于語(yǔ)言中,而且存在于行動(dòng)和思想中。隱喻有源域,目標(biāo)域和從源域到目標(biāo)域的映射,人們可以通過(guò)源域理解目標(biāo)域。 情感被認(rèn)為是人類(lèi)最普遍,最基本的人生體驗(yàn)。人類(lèi)的情感是抽象的,他們常常通過(guò)隱喻和轉(zhuǎn)喻來(lái)表達(dá)。學(xué)者對(duì)情感隱喻的研究主要集中在快樂(lè)、悲傷、憤怒、愛(ài)等等。而驕傲、驚訝、恐懼和焦慮這四種情感的研究卻很少得到關(guān)注。因此本文著重研究驕傲、驚訝、恐懼和焦慮這四種情感在英漢語(yǔ)中的隱喻表達(dá)的異同。此項(xiàng)研究對(duì)跨文化交際和語(yǔ)言教學(xué)有一定的意義。 萊考夫和約翰遜提出著名的概念隱喻理論,這個(gè)理論對(duì)我們進(jìn)一步研究隱喻是非常重要的。本論文在吸取中外隱喻研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,充分運(yùn)用概念隱喻理論,從認(rèn)知角度對(duì)英漢情感隱喻進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析。本文由五大部分組成,作者首先介紹了論文的研究目的和意義,之后回顧了國(guó)內(nèi)外英漢隱喻及情感隱喻研究的概況和現(xiàn)狀,并且總結(jié)評(píng)論了隱喻和情感隱喻在國(guó)內(nèi)外的發(fā)展,運(yùn)用概念隱喻理論詳細(xì)分析了它的種類(lèi)、特征、經(jīng)驗(yàn)基礎(chǔ)、工作機(jī)制。通過(guò)對(duì)大量英漢語(yǔ)料的分析,著重探究驕傲、驚訝、恐懼和焦慮這四種情感在英漢語(yǔ)中的隱喻表達(dá)的異同,并且探究了造成這些共性和個(gè)性的原因。作者將情感隱喻的普遍性歸因于人類(lèi)自身體驗(yàn)的普遍性及認(rèn)知共性,而地理環(huán)境、自然環(huán)境、風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣等文化差異又導(dǎo)致了我們對(duì)情感隱喻的理解自然是不同的。 這篇論文以驕傲隱喻,焦慮隱喻,恐懼隱喻和驚訝隱喻為例從概念隱喻理論視角對(duì)英漢語(yǔ)言中的情感隱喻進(jìn)行了對(duì)比研究,分析了情感隱喻的異同及異同原因。由于客觀條件的限制和作者的能力有限,本文對(duì)英漢情感隱喻的對(duì)比研究還不夠深入,這一領(lǐng)域值得我們進(jìn)一步研究。
[Abstract]:Scholars used to think that metaphor is only a rhetorical device, but in 1980, the famous scholars Lakoff and Johnson published metaphor for our Survival, which accelerated the study of metaphor. Lakoff and Johnson believe that metaphor is not only a rhetorical device, but also an important cognitive tool, which plays an important role in the creation and understanding of thinking and language. Metaphors prevail in our daily lives. It exists not only in language, but also in action and thought. The mapping of active domain, target domain and source domain to target domain can be understood by source domain. Emotion is regarded as the most common and basic experience of human life. Human emotions are abstract and often expressed through metaphor and metonymy. Scholars' researches on affective metaphor mainly focus on happiness, sadness, anger, love and so on. However, pride, surprise, fear and anxiety have received little attention. Therefore, this paper focuses on the similarities and differences of the metaphorical expressions of pride, surprise, fear and anxiety in English and Chinese. This study has certain significance for cross-cultural communication and language teaching. Lakoff and Johnson put forward the famous conceptual metaphor theory, which is very important for us to study metaphor further. On the basis of absorbing the research results of Chinese and English metaphors, this thesis makes a comparative analysis of affective metaphors in English and Chinese from the cognitive perspective by using the theory of conceptual metaphor. This thesis is composed of five parts. The author first introduces the purpose and significance of the thesis, then reviews the general situation and present situation of English and Chinese metaphor and affective metaphor, and summarizes and comments on the development of metaphor and affective metaphor at home and abroad. In this paper, conceptual metaphor theory is used to analyze its category, characteristics, empirical basis and working mechanism in detail. Through the analysis of a large number of English and Chinese data, this paper focuses on the similarities and differences of the metaphorical expressions of pride, surprise, fear and anxiety in English and Chinese, and probes into the causes of these commonalities and individuality. The author ascribes the universality of emotional metaphor to the universality and cognitive commonness of human's own experience, while the cultural differences of geographical environment, natural environment, customs and habits lead to different understanding of emotional metaphor. This paper makes a comparative study of affective metaphors in English and Chinese from the perspective of conceptual metaphor, taking pride metaphor, anxiety metaphor, fear metaphor and surprise metaphor as examples, and analyzes the similarities and differences of affective metaphors and their causes. Due to the limitation of objective conditions and the limited ability of the author, the contrastive study of affective metaphor in English and Chinese is not deep enough, and this field is worthy of further study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H15;H315

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫曉艷;英漢詩(shī)歌中花意象的認(rèn)知隱喻對(duì)比研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1865016