本文選題：漢韓 + 選擇復句��； 參考：《延邊大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：復句是語言學界研究的重要領域之一,也是使用頻率較高的聚合類之一,一直受到語法學家的關注,其中選擇復句是使用頻率較高的一類復句。本文在前人研究成果的基礎上,運用對比語言學理論與方法,對漢語和韓國語的選擇復句進行語義和句法方面的對比,從中找出中韓兩種語言在選擇關系表達上的異同點。 第一章緒論部分,主要介紹了論文的研究內(nèi)容與范圍、研究目的與意義以及前人的研究概況和語料來源等。 第二章對漢韓選擇復句的分類以及語義方面進行了分析。首先對漢語選擇復句和韓國語選擇復句進行了分類,其次對漢語選擇復句關聯(lián)詞以及韓國語選擇復句接續(xù)詞尾的語義特征進行了介紹。 第三章首先考察了漢韓選擇復句的基本構成,其次從對立關系、差異關系對漢韓選擇復句前后分句的關系進行了對比分析,最后考察漢韓選擇復句的句類選擇,主要從陳述句、疑問句、感嘆句和祈使句等方面進行的分析。 第四章首先從主語的位置和主語的一致性兩方面對漢韓選擇復句的主語進行了對比分析,再次考察了漢韓選擇復句對謂語的選擇問題,最后對漢韓選擇復句中的否定標記的位置進行了分析。 最后是結語部分,概括全文的主要內(nèi)容并指出論文的不足點。 本文的對比研究會有利于第二語言漢語(韓國語)習得者能夠更好地掌握目的語,而且對漢韓(韓漢)雙向翻譯具有一定的參考價值。
[Abstract]:Complex sentence is one of the most important research fields in the field of linguistics, and it is also one of the aggregation classes with high frequency of use. It has been paid close attention to by linguists all the time, among which the choice of complex sentence is a kind of complex sentence with high frequency.On the basis of previous studies, this paper compares the semantic and syntactic aspects of Chinese and Korean alternative complex sentences by using the theory and method of contrastive linguistics, and finds out the similarities and differences between Chinese and Korean in the expression of choice relations.The first chapter introduces the content and scope of the research, the purpose and significance of the research, the former research situation and the source of the corpus.The second chapter analyzes the classification and semantic aspects of Chinese and Korean selective complex sentences.This paper first classifies Chinese selected complex sentences and Korean selected complex sentences, and then introduces the semantic features of Chinese selected complex sentence related words and Korean selective complex sentences.The third chapter first examines the basic composition of Chinese and Korean selected complex sentences, and then makes a comparative analysis of the relationship between Chinese and Korean choice of complex sentences from the perspective of opposites and differences, and finally examines the choice of sentence types between Chinese and Korean choice of complex sentences, mainly from the perspective of declarative sentences.The analysis of interrogative sentence, exclamatory sentence and imperative sentence.In the fourth chapter, the author makes a comparative analysis of the subject of the Chinese and Korean selected complex sentences from the position of the subject and the consistency of the subject, and then examines the choice of the Chinese and Korean selected complex sentences to the predicates.Finally, the position of negative markers in Chinese and Korean choice complex sentences is analyzed.The last part is the conclusion, which summarizes the main contents of the paper and points out the shortcomings of the paper.The contrastive study of this paper will help the learners of the second language Chinese (Korean) to master the target language better, and it will also have some reference value for the two-way translation of Chinese and Korean (Korean and Chinese).
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H146;H55

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李國慶;現(xiàn)代漢語的“不是P,也是Q”復句[J];安徽教育學院學報;2002年05期

2 張劍;取舍復句類別及其修辭作用新探[J];鞍山師范學院學報;1994年01期

3 聶焱;漢語復句基本類型的思維形式[J];固原師專學報;1996年05期

4 朱子良;選擇復句與選言命題[J];衡陽師專學報(社會科學);1995年01期

5 尹蔚;;選擇關系標記關聯(lián)模式探究[J];漢語學報;2010年01期

6 尹蔚;;有標選擇復句語用價值探察[J];漢語學報;2013年03期

7 邢福義;;現(xiàn)代漢語的“要么P,要么Q”句式[J];世界漢語教學;1987年04期

8 趙秀娟;;“或者”句與“要么”句的功能解析及教學策略[J];世界漢語教學;2011年04期

9 王天佑;;“與其A不如B”的語義及認知分析[J];現(xiàn)代語文;2006年06期

10 韓濱;;現(xiàn)代漢語選擇復句研究綜述[J];語文學刊;2011年17期

，

本文編號：1761468