本文選題：權(quán)力　切入點(diǎn)：言語(yǔ)策略　出處：《湖北工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：法庭話(huà)語(yǔ)作為國(guó)內(nèi)語(yǔ)言學(xué)交叉研究領(lǐng)域來(lái)說(shuō)是一個(gè)新課題，而庭審互動(dòng)研究又屬于法庭話(huà)語(yǔ)分析的一個(gè)動(dòng)態(tài)研究，作者研究本課題的原因主要是以下幾個(gè)方面：1.從理論方面來(lái)說(shuō)，它屬于是語(yǔ)言學(xué)和社會(huì)學(xué)的交叉學(xué)科，它把主要的庭審參與者作為研究對(duì)象，更具體的分析辯護(hù)律師、公訴人以及被告人三者之前的關(guān)系；2.從實(shí)踐的角度來(lái)看，本文對(duì)法庭語(yǔ)料的研究對(duì)法庭參與者和工作者帶來(lái)了啟示；3.從語(yǔ)料來(lái)看，，本文提供了一些相關(guān)的語(yǔ)料，為構(gòu)建法庭語(yǔ)料庫(kù)略獻(xiàn)綿薄之力。本文以目的原則為理論框架，用收集的語(yǔ)料:作者親自轉(zhuǎn)寫(xiě)的兩場(chǎng)10萬(wàn)字的新疆烏市中級(jí)人民法院刑事案件的法庭錄音進(jìn)行定性分析，把參與者作為研究對(duì)象，旨在圍繞三個(gè)研究問(wèn)題：1.目的原則理論能否有力的解釋參與者公訴人、辯護(hù)律師和被告人三者的關(guān)系以及三者存在什么樣的關(guān)系？2.他們都采取了哪些策略來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)自身的目的？3.在庭審互動(dòng)中，說(shuō)話(huà)者和答話(huà)者使用策略的目的與動(dòng)機(jī)是什么？通過(guò)分析，本文得出三個(gè)結(jié)論：1.目的原則能夠解釋參與者三者之間的關(guān)系，他們是既對(duì)立又一致，控制與抗?fàn)幍年P(guān)系；2.庭審問(wèn)答互動(dòng)中，三者之間采取了問(wèn)話(huà)策略與答話(huà)策略來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)自身的目的；3.通過(guò)分析，律師和被告人是合作關(guān)系，他們的目的一致，都希望案件勝利被告減輕罪責(zé)，而公訴人是對(duì)立關(guān)系，他的目的與被告、律師相反。 本文主要是五部分，第一部分主要介紹了研究目的、意義與研究問(wèn)題、方法和語(yǔ)料來(lái)源。第二部分是文獻(xiàn)綜述，作者通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)法庭話(huà)語(yǔ)、權(quán)力與話(huà)語(yǔ)策略的研究進(jìn)行了綜述，并通過(guò)定性分析,從語(yǔ)用研究和話(huà)語(yǔ)策略這兩個(gè)維度來(lái)探討權(quán)力的實(shí)現(xiàn)方式和話(huà)語(yǔ)權(quán)的控制.并指出了話(huà)語(yǔ)策略可以從答話(huà)策略和問(wèn)話(huà)策略?xún)蓚�(gè)方面來(lái)研究。第三部分是理論框架，目的原則是參與者遵循的語(yǔ)用原則。第四部分是本文的主體部分，作者通過(guò)語(yǔ)料從目的原則對(duì)三個(gè)參與者進(jìn)行分析，我們可以看出參與者之間是合作與對(duì)抗、控制與對(duì)抗的關(guān)系。第五部分是結(jié)論，提出了新發(fā)現(xiàn)、不足和展望。 本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)在于：1.在閱讀的基礎(chǔ)上，再次梳理、歸納了話(huà)語(yǔ)策略的分類(lèi)，從兩個(gè)維度上對(duì)話(huà)語(yǔ)策略進(jìn)行分類(lèi)：答話(huà)策略和問(wèn)話(huà)策略，探討了各參與者實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)力控制或權(quán)力抗?fàn)幍挠行г?huà)語(yǔ)策略。2.我們用目的原則對(duì)語(yǔ)料進(jìn)行分析可以發(fā)現(xiàn)，在刑事庭審中我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn)三者之間的關(guān)系是目的一致或者目的對(duì)抗的關(guān)系，但是我們卻看不到目的中立，所以說(shuō)目的原則在應(yīng)用在刑事庭審時(shí)，主要是目的一致關(guān)系和目的對(duì)立關(guān)系在起作用。
[Abstract]:As a new topic in the field of cross-study of linguistics in China, the study of court discourse is a dynamic study in the field of forensic discourse analysis. The main reasons for the study are as follows: 1.Theoretically, it belongs to the interdiscipline of linguistics and sociology. It takes the main participants in the trial as the object of study, and more specifically analyzes the relationship between defense counsel, public prosecutor and defendant.From a practical point of view, the study of the forensic corpus has brought enlightenment to court participants and workers.From the point of view of the corpus, this paper provides some relevant data to construct the court corpus.This paper, based on the theory frame of the principle of purpose, uses the collected corpus: two court recordings of 100000 words of Xinjiang Intermediate people's Court, which are written by the author in person, are qualitatively analyzed, and the participants are taken as the objects of study.Designed around three research questions: 1.Whether the principle theory can explain the relationship among the public prosecutor, defense lawyer and defendant and what kind of relationship exist among them?What strategies have they adopted to achieve their goals?What is the purpose and motivation of the speakers and respondents to use strategies during the trial interaction?Through analysis, this paper draws three conclusions: 1.The objective principle can explain the relationship among the participants, they are both opposite and consistent, the relationship between control and resistance is 2. 5%.In the interaction of trial questions and answers, the three adopted questioning strategy and answering strategy to achieve their own purpose.Through the analysis, the lawyer and the defendant are cooperative relations, their purpose is the same, all hope the case wins the defendant to alleviate the crime responsibility, and the public prosecutor is the opposite relation, his purpose is opposite to the defendant, the lawyer.This paper consists of five parts. The first part introduces the research purpose, significance and problems, methods and sources of corpus.The second part is a literature review. The author summarizes the research on court discourse, power and discourse strategy by domestic and foreign scholars, and through qualitative analysis.This paper discusses the realization of power and the control of discourse power from the perspectives of pragmatic study and discourse strategy.It also points out that utterance strategies can be studied from two aspects: answering strategies and questioning strategies.The third part is the theoretical framework and the Skopos principle is the pragmatic principle followed by the participants.The fourth part is the main part of this paper. The author analyzes the three participants from the objective principle through the corpus. We can see the relationship between the participants is cooperation and confrontation, control and confrontation.The fifth part is the conclusion, proposes the new discovery, the insufficiency and the prospect.The innovation of this paper lies in 1: 1.On the basis of reading, this paper summarizes the classification of discourse strategies, classifies them from two dimensions: answering strategies and questioning strategies, and probes into effective discourse strategies of power control or power struggle among participants.When we analyze the corpus with the aim principle, we can find that in the criminal trial, the relationship between the three is the same purpose or the goal confrontation, but we do not see the goal neutral.Therefore, when the purpose principle is applied in the criminal trial, the aim consistent relation and the purpose opposition relation play a role.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖北工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H15

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張麗萍,金孝柏;刑事法庭上的合作交際研究——法官—被告人庭審會(huì)話(huà)分析[J];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

2 呂萬(wàn)英;司法調(diào)解話(huà)語(yǔ)中的沖突性打斷[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

3 張麗萍;控制與抗?fàn)?法官與被告人法庭交際會(huì)話(huà)分析[J];南京郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

4 呂萬(wàn)英;;法官話(huà)語(yǔ)的權(quán)力支配[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2006年02期

5 辛斌;;�？碌臋�(quán)力論與批評(píng)性語(yǔ)篇分析[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2006年02期

6 葛云鋒;杜金榜;;法庭問(wèn)話(huà)中的話(huà)題控制與信息獲取[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2005年06期

7 廖美珍;答話(huà)研究——法庭答話(huà)的啟示[J];修辭學(xué)習(xí);2004年05期

8 廖美珍;“目的原則”與目的分析(上)——語(yǔ)用研究新途徑探索[J];修辭學(xué)習(xí);2005年03期

9 廖美珍;“目的原則”與目的分析(下)——語(yǔ)用話(huà)語(yǔ)分析新途徑[J];修辭學(xué)習(xí);2005年04期

10 劉荷清;;法庭會(huì)話(huà)中的答話(huà)修正與成因研究[J];修辭學(xué)習(xí);2006年04期

本文編號(hào)：1705733