本文選題：元語言否定　切入點：理想認知模型　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：元語言否定的語用功能在之前的研究中是個熱門的話題。很多學(xué)者在之前的研究中探討了許多關(guān)于元語言否定語用方面的話題,只有少數(shù)研究是以認知語言學(xué)為出發(fā)點去分析元語言否定。目前,大多數(shù)學(xué)者試圖去說明究竟什么是元語言否定,元語言否定有什么樣的語用功能。但是,他們沒有深一步地運用認知的理論去解讀語用功能的內(nèi)在機制,因此本文運用認知語言學(xué)“理想認知模型”理論和“認知語境”理論解釋元語言否定語用功能的內(nèi)在機制。從認知的角度看,意義只存在于交際中。所以,對于元語言否定的研究一定要考慮參與對話者自身的因素以及他們所涉及的對話環(huán)境和情景。本文認為元語言否定實際上是接受信息一方在腦子里所建立的對一系列的典型模型的否定。信息接受者所創(chuàng)建的典型認知模型是指當(dāng)交流者雙方為了能使彼此交流順暢而選擇一個針對當(dāng)前情景最合適的假想模型作為背景知識。元語言否定的整個過程是在兩個理想認知模型之間完成的,并且這也是元語言否定不同于其他大多數(shù)否定的根本特征。 本文嘗試著回答一下的問題： (1)信息接收者怎樣解讀元語言否定? (2)元語言否定語用功能的內(nèi)在機制是什么? (3)該篇論文的主要發(fā)現(xiàn)對教學(xué)有什么意義與幫助? 這篇論文分五個章節(jié)展開了元語言否定語用功能的認知分析。第一章是文章的引文,主要出四個部分組成。它們分別是文章的研究背景,研究目地,研究意義和文章結(jié)構(gòu)。第二章是文獻綜述,主要從語義,語用,認知三個方面梳理了前人的研究。第三章是論述了本文的一些理論基礎(chǔ),這些理論為后面研究奠定了一定的理論基礎(chǔ)以及對相關(guān)概念進行了界定。第四章是文章的核心部分,提出了元語言否定的語用功能并且用認知理論的觀點分析元語言否定的語用功能。第五章是本文的結(jié)尾,對前面幾個章節(jié)的總結(jié),總結(jié)了本文的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)并揭示了其潛在意義,同時也指出了本文的局限所在,為后續(xù)研究提供點滴建議。 元語言否定是否定的重要一個部分,也是一種自然地語言現(xiàn)象。在最近的幾年,許多學(xué)者開始研究這個語言現(xiàn)象,但是大多數(shù)學(xué)者是從語用方面解釋元語言否定,很少用認知的觀點去解釋元語言否定�；谇叭说难芯�,本文用理想認知模型理論和認知情景理論對元語言否定現(xiàn)象的語用功能進行了闡釋。并且從交際和教學(xué)方面闡述了研究的意義。
[Abstract]:The pragmatic function of metalanguage negation is a hot topic in previous studies. At present, most scholars try to explain what is meta-linguistic negation and what pragmatic function meta negation has. They have not used the cognitive theory to interpret the intrinsic mechanism of pragmatic function. Therefore, this paper uses the theory of "ideal cognitive model" and "cognitive context" in cognitive linguistics to explain the internal mechanism of meta language negative pragmatic function. From a cognitive perspective, meaning exists only in communication. The study of meta-language negation must take into account the factors of the interlocutors themselves and the dialogue environment and the situation they involve. This paper holds that meta-language negation is actually a kind of contrast in the brain of the party receiving the message. The typical cognitive model created by the information receiver means that when the communicator chooses a hypothetical model which is the most suitable for the current situation as the background knowledge in order to make the communication smooth. The whole process of meta-language negation is completed between two ideal cognitive models. And this is also the meta-linguistic negation is different from most other negation. This article attempts to answer the following questions:. (1) how do information receivers interpret metalinguistic negation? 2) what is the internal mechanism of meta language negating pragmatic function? 3) what is the significance and help of the main findings of this paper to the teaching? This thesis is divided into five chapters to analyze the negative pragmatic function of meta. The first chapter is the citation of the thesis, which consists of four parts. The second chapter is a literature review, mainly from the semantic, pragmatic, cognitive three aspects of previous research. Chapter three is to discuss some of the theoretical basis of this paper. These theories lay a certain theoretical foundation for the later research and define the related concepts. Chapter 4th is the core part of the article. This paper puts forward the pragmatic function of meta-language negation and analyzes the pragmatic function of meta-language negation from the perspective of cognitive theory. Chapter 5th is the end of this paper. At the same time, it also points out the limitations of this paper, and provides some suggestions for further research. Meta-language negation is an important part of negation and a natural linguistic phenomenon. In recent years, many scholars have begun to study this linguistic phenomenon, but most of them interpret metalinguistic negation from pragmatic aspects. There is little cognitive interpretation of metalinguistic negation. Based on previous studies, This paper uses the ideal cognitive model theory and the cognitive situational theory to explain the pragmatic functions of meta-language negation, and expounds the significance of the research from the aspects of communication and teaching.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H030

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉龍根;崔敏;;“元語言否定”的多維闡釋[J];東北師大學(xué)報;2006年03期

2 何春燕;語用否定的類型及使用動機[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年03期

3 梁曉波;否定的認知分析[J];外語研究;2004年05期

4 梁錦祥;元語言否定的否定對象[J];外語學(xué)刊;2000年03期

5 冉永平;;論語用元語言現(xiàn)象及其語用指向[J];外語學(xué)刊;2005年06期

6 高航;元語否定的認知語用分析[J];四川外語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年02期

7 文旭;;認知語言學(xué)事業(yè)[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2011年02期

8 孔慶成;元語否定的類型[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報);1995年04期

9 王相鋒;否定句的標(biāo)記特征[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報);1997年04期

10 戴耀晶!200433;試論現(xiàn)代漢語的否定范疇[J];語言教學(xué)與研究;2000年03期

，

本文編號：1632995