本文選題：庭審話語(yǔ)　切入點(diǎn)：話輪結(jié)構(gòu)　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：庭審語(yǔ)言是一種特殊語(yǔ)用環(huán)境下的會(huì)話形式,它在詞匯、語(yǔ)法等方面都有其獨(dú)特性。通過運(yùn)用相關(guān)語(yǔ)言知識(shí)對(duì)相關(guān)庭審案例進(jìn)行的分析,庭審語(yǔ)言自身所具有的語(yǔ)用價(jià)值已經(jīng)顯而易見。本文研究的目的,就在于通過對(duì)庭審語(yǔ)言的語(yǔ)用分析,揭示語(yǔ)言技巧和語(yǔ)言策略的重要性。本文在論述之初,簡(jiǎn)介了庭審語(yǔ)言在語(yǔ)用研究方面所取得的成就及其相關(guān)進(jìn)展。這一部分側(cè)重對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外現(xiàn)有研究理論的歸納總結(jié)。通過對(duì)這部分的資料搜集,筆者力圖對(duì)庭審話語(yǔ)的相關(guān)研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行相對(duì)有效的整理,對(duì)其脈絡(luò)有一個(gè)相對(duì)完善的梳理。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者受到一定的啟發(fā),對(duì)繼續(xù)展開相關(guān)研究有了極大的幫助。本文的論述除了借鑒前人在庭審語(yǔ)料方面對(duì)庭審話語(yǔ)的言語(yǔ)行為進(jìn)行分析(主要指運(yùn)用奧斯汀的言語(yǔ)行為理論對(duì)庭審話語(yǔ)進(jìn)行綜合分析,對(duì)庭審言語(yǔ)行為進(jìn)行分類,并對(duì)法庭上最具話語(yǔ)權(quán)的法官的宣判語(yǔ)言進(jìn)行具體分析)之外,更強(qiáng)調(diào)運(yùn)用所學(xué)的語(yǔ)言學(xué)相關(guān)的理論知識(shí)(主要包括功能主義語(yǔ)言學(xué)、心理語(yǔ)言學(xué)、邏輯語(yǔ)言學(xué)、社會(huì)語(yǔ)言學(xué)等),在搜集相關(guān)真實(shí)的庭審話語(yǔ)案例的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)庭審話語(yǔ)在會(huì)話推理和會(huì)話形式上進(jìn)行庭審作用的分析,側(cè)重于研究不同的會(huì)話形式所代表的話語(yǔ)技巧和相關(guān)的語(yǔ)言策略以及對(duì)庭審宣判結(jié)果的影響,并在此基礎(chǔ)上探討庭審話語(yǔ)權(quán)力、策略等所反映出的社會(huì)制度性問題以及人文關(guān)懷在庭審語(yǔ)言中的缺失,呼吁相關(guān)部門的關(guān)注和相關(guān)政策的改革。本文的研究特色,主要在于：一、注重庭審案例的真實(shí)性和與相關(guān)語(yǔ)言點(diǎn)的高度契合性。二、注重對(duì)庭審角色的兼顧,并對(duì)相關(guān)語(yǔ)言點(diǎn)的覆蓋性進(jìn)行較深入的挖掘。三、注重庭審語(yǔ)言的具體話語(yǔ)分析,而不僅僅停留在話語(yǔ)表達(dá)的形式方面。四、在對(duì)庭審語(yǔ)言的分析方面,注重各類參考文獻(xiàn)的吸收歸納,吸取相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn),并在此基礎(chǔ)上得到相應(yīng)啟發(fā),進(jìn)行有效的思考,在研究深度和廣度上都有所延伸。五、引發(fā)庭審角色的轉(zhuǎn)換和話語(yǔ)策略的運(yùn)用所反映出的對(duì)社會(huì)制度性問題的思考。
[Abstract]:Trial language is a kind of conversational form in a special pragmatic environment. It is unique in terms of vocabulary and grammar. The purpose of this study is to reveal the importance of language skills and strategies through pragmatic analysis of trial language. This part focuses on the summarization and summary of the existing research theories at home and abroad. The author tries to make a relatively effective arrangement of the relative research status of the trial discourse, and has a relatively perfect combing of its context. On the basis of this, the author is inspired to some extent. It is of great help to continue the relevant research. Besides drawing lessons from predecessors, this thesis analyzes the speech acts of trial discourse (mainly refers to the use of Austin's speech act theory to conduct a comprehensive analysis of court speech. In addition to classifying speech acts in court and analyzing the sentence language of the most powerful judge in court, it emphasizes the use of linguistic relevant theoretical knowledge (including functionalist linguistics, psycholinguistics, etc.). Logical linguistics, sociolinguistics and so on, on the basis of collecting relevant real trial discourse cases, analyze the role of trial discourse in conversational reasoning and conversational form. It focuses on the discourse skills and related language strategies represented by different conversational forms and their influence on the outcome of court judgment, and on this basis discusses the power of court discourse. The problems of social system and the lack of humanistic care in the language of trial are reflected in the strategies. The research features of this paper are as follows: 1. Pay attention to the authenticity of the trial case and the high consistency with the relevant language points. Second, pay attention to the consideration of the trial role, and dig deeper into the coverage of the relevant language points. Third, pay attention to the specific discourse analysis of the trial language. Fourth, in the analysis of the language of the trial, we should pay attention to the absorption and induction of all kinds of references, absorb relevant experience, and on this basis get the corresponding inspiration and effective thinking. Fifth, the transformation of the role of the trial and the use of discourse strategies reflect the reflection on the social system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H030

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王揚(yáng);語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)的特征及其認(rèn)知闡釋[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

2 譚s，

本文編號(hào)：1621702