本文選題：“X得不能再X”構(gòu)式　切入點(diǎn)：句法特征　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中,“X得不能再X”屬于述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)中比較特殊的一類(lèi),在語(yǔ)言表達(dá)上具有豐富性和生動(dòng)性,但學(xué)界對(duì)其研究尚不夠深入。本文以構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法理論為指導(dǎo),借鑒了認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)等理論,在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)“X得不能再X”進(jìn)行了全面、細(xì)致的描寫(xiě)和分析。全文主要分析了“X得不能再X”的構(gòu)式義、“X”進(jìn)入的條件、詞匯義與構(gòu)式義的互動(dòng)、形成機(jī)制,以及與相關(guān)構(gòu)式之間的關(guān)系。 “X得不能再X”的組成部分“不能再”表達(dá)的否定、勸阻義與整個(gè)格式表達(dá)的極限程度義不相符,其構(gòu)式義為表主觀述評(píng)性的極限程度量。能夠進(jìn)入該構(gòu)式的“X”應(yīng)是能夠表示量幅的非定量形容詞、動(dòng)詞和名詞,其中動(dòng)詞的量幅通過(guò)動(dòng)作持續(xù)時(shí)間長(zhǎng)短、動(dòng)作重復(fù)次數(shù),或者動(dòng)作表現(xiàn)幅度來(lái)體現(xiàn),名詞則需要包含程度性語(yǔ)義,從而表示一定量幅。 “X得不能再X”構(gòu)式義與詞匯義的互動(dòng)關(guān)系包括三種情況：當(dāng)“X”為形容詞、心理動(dòng)詞、以及本身包含量幅的動(dòng)詞時(shí),詞匯義與構(gòu)式義一致；當(dāng)“X”為名詞時(shí),詞匯義與構(gòu)式義部分一致；當(dāng)“X”為通過(guò)持續(xù)時(shí)間和重復(fù)次數(shù)來(lái)表示量幅的動(dòng)詞時(shí),詞匯義與構(gòu)式義不一致�！癤得不能再X”構(gòu)式表現(xiàn)了說(shuō)話(huà)人很強(qiáng)的主觀性,并且?guī)в幸环N夸張量,它形成的語(yǔ)用機(jī)制是溯因推理,認(rèn)知機(jī)制是概念整合和轉(zhuǎn)喻。 “X得不能再X”構(gòu)式與母式“X得不能再Y”的關(guān)系屬于實(shí)例聯(lián)接,與同一語(yǔ)義框架下的“X得要死／要命”、“X得不得了”主要在句法、語(yǔ)用等方面存在差
[Abstract]:In modern Chinese, "X can no longer be X" belongs to a special kind of sentence complement structure, which is rich and lively in language expression, but the research on it is not deep enough in academic circles. This paper is guided by the theory of construction grammar. Drawing on the theory of cognitive linguistics and other theories, this paper gives a comprehensive and detailed description and analysis of "X is no longer X" on the basis of previous studies. The full text mainly analyzes the construction meaning of "X can't be X" and the conditions of "X" entry. The interaction between lexical meaning and constructional meaning, the mechanism of formation, and the relationship between lexical meaning and related construction. The negation of "can't", a component of "X can no longer be X", does not correspond to the limit of meaning expressed in the entire format. "X", which can enter the construction, should be a non-quantitative adjective, verb and noun that can express the magnitude of the measure, in which the magnitude of the verb is determined by the duration of the action, the number of repetitions of the action, Or the range of action to reflect, nouns need to contain a degree of semantics, so as to represent a certain amount of amplitude. The interaction between "X" construction meaning and lexical meaning includes three situations: when "X" is an adjective, a psychological verb, and a verb with its own size, the lexical meaning is consistent with the construction meaning, and when "X" is a noun, the lexical meaning is the same as that of the word "X" when the word "X" is a noun. The lexical meaning is consistent with the constructional meaning; when "X" is a verb that expresses the magnitude through duration and repetition, the lexical meaning is inconsistent with the constructional meaning. The "X can't be X" construction shows the speaker's strong subjectivity and has an exaggerated amount. Its pragmatic mechanism is retroactive reasoning and cognitive mechanism is conceptual integration and metonymy. The relation between "X can't be X" and "X can't be Y" belongs to the instance connection, and "X must die / die" under the same semantic frame, and "X can't do anything" is mainly bad in syntax, pragmatics and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陸儉明;;構(gòu)式與意象圖式[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

2 姜文振;感受動(dòng)詞說(shuō)略[J];北方論叢;2004年05期

3 力量;肖應(yīng)平;;“得”的語(yǔ)法化動(dòng)因和機(jī)制[J];北方論叢;2006年01期

4 劉蘭民;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)極性程度補(bǔ)語(yǔ)初探[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年06期

5 馬克冬;;認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)視野下的轉(zhuǎn)喻研究[J];畢節(jié)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年09期

6 袁毓林;句子的焦點(diǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)及其對(duì)語(yǔ)義解釋的影響[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);2003年04期

7 楊平;帶“得”的述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;1990年01期

8 孫建強(qiáng);能帶程度補(bǔ)語(yǔ)的動(dòng)詞[J];固原師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);1994年03期

9 邱冬梅;口語(yǔ)中普遍而又特殊的補(bǔ)語(yǔ)類(lèi)型——感受程度補(bǔ)語(yǔ)[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2001年10期

10 甘于恩;;析“再”[J];辭書(shū)研究;1981年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李錦姬;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)補(bǔ)語(yǔ)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年

2 宋永圭;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)情態(tài)動(dòng)詞“能”的否定研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 方芳;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)極限性程度補(bǔ)語(yǔ)的多維考察[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

2 毛哲詩(shī);關(guān)于形容詞前的“再”的研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1615138