本文選題：語篇-歷史分析方法　切入點(diǎn)：新聞發(fā)言人　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文運(yùn)用Ruth Wodak的語篇-歷史分析方法中的所指策略、謂語指示策略、辯論策略和視角化策略,結(jié)合語用學(xué)中的閃避策略作為框架,對中美新聞發(fā)言人關(guān)于釣魚島事件的講話進(jìn)行批評對比分析。本文試圖找出在中美新聞發(fā)言人講話時(shí)所用話語策略的差異,并分析引起這些差異的原因。 所指策略能夠幫助建構(gòu)和重現(xiàn)社會參與者。它試圖使用一些語言學(xué)方法來使社會參與者成為“組內(nèi)成員”或者“組外成員”（田海龍，2009:158）。謂語指示策略通過使用積極或者消極的謂語，顯示出社會參與者語篇的態(tài)度(WodakMeyer,2001:73)。辯論策略通過不同的辯題來判斷和證實(shí)積極的或者消極的描述。一共有15種辯題被用作判斷政治層面上的包含或者排外，，歧視或偏向。視角化策略是指說話者從不同的視角參與到對特定事件或話語的報(bào)道、描述、陳述或轉(zhuǎn)述中(WodakMeyer,2001:73)。 本文的語料是從中國外交部50次的例行記者招待會和美國國務(wù)院40次的例行記者招待會中挑選的。總共從中篩選出了14個(gè)例子。本文旨在在閃避策略的框架下對比中美新聞發(fā)言人講話的語篇策略。在此基礎(chǔ)上，分析他們的差異，以及形成差異的原因。中美新聞發(fā)言人在用詞、固定搭配、語氣、回答問題的方式以及句子結(jié)構(gòu)上存在差異。在對差異進(jìn)行總結(jié)之后，本文從三個(gè)方面對形成差異的原因進(jìn)行了分析。 本文具有一定的實(shí)踐意義。首先，本文能夠培養(yǎng)和提高人們在分析新聞發(fā)言人講話時(shí)的批評意識。人們可以認(rèn)清新聞發(fā)言人真實(shí)意圖和意識形態(tài)。其次，本文拓寬了研究范圍。人們可以通過運(yùn)用語篇-歷史分析方法的話語策略并結(jié)合其他語言學(xué)方法來分析相關(guān)語料。最后，本文對英語教學(xué)也有一定的益處。英語教師可以使學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)和了解相關(guān)的話語策略,能夠幫助學(xué)生提高交際和寫作能力。
[Abstract]:This paper uses the referential strategy, predicate deixis strategy, argument strategy and perspective strategy of Ruth Wodak's discourse history analysis method as the frame of this thesis, combined with the evasive strategy in pragmatics. This paper attempts to find out the differences in the discourse strategies used by the Chinese and American press spokesmen in their speeches and to analyze the reasons for these differences. The referential strategy can help to construct and reproduce social participants. It attempts to use linguistic methods to make social participants "in-group" or "out-of-group members" (Tian Hailong 2009: 158. predicate demonstrative strategy by using product). Extreme or negative predicates, Showing the attitude of social participants in discourse Wodak Meyern 2001: 73. debate strategies are used to judge and substantiate positive or negative descriptions through different debate questions. A total of 15 kinds of debate questions are used to judge inclusion or exclusion at the political level. Discrimination or bias. The strategy of visual angle refers to the speaker participating in the report, description, statement or report of a particular event or discourse from different angles of view in Wodak Meyer / 2001: 73. The corpus of this paper is selected from 50 routine press conferences of the Chinese foreign ministry and 40 routine press conferences of the u. S. State department. A total of 14 examples are selected. On the basis of comparing the discourse strategies of Chinese and American spokesmen, Analyze their differences and the reasons for the differences. There are differences in terms, fixed collocations, mood, ways of answering questions and sentence structure between Chinese and American press spokesmen. This paper analyzes the causes of the difference from three aspects. This paper has certain practical significance. Firstly, it can cultivate and enhance people's critical consciousness in analyzing the speeches of the press spokesmen. People can recognize the true intentions and ideology of the press spokesmen. This paper broadens the scope of research. People can use discourse strategies of discourse-history analysis and combine with other linguistic methods to analyze the relevant corpus. English teachers can help students learn and understand relevant discourse strategies and help students improve their communicative and writing abilities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H15;H315

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 竇衛(wèi)霖;張曉瑩;;中美政府發(fā)言人閃避策略的對比分析——朝核問題個(gè)案研究[J];外語教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年04期

2 季麗s

本文編號：1613449