本文選題：構詞詞素　切入點：構詞數(shù)量　出處：《山東師范大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》是先秦重要的歷史典籍。論文以先秦時期《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》中構詞詞素作為研究對象，綜合現(xiàn)代語言學理論和方法中的定量與定性、共時與歷時相結合等研究方法，借鑒散見于詞匯學專書以及一些復音詞研究的論文中對上古漢語構詞詞素的研究成果，從構詞數(shù)量、構詞位置和構詞類型三個方面對《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》中的構詞詞素進行分析，從歷時的角度對兩個時期的構詞詞素進行比較，為研究先秦漢語詞匯從以單音詞為主過渡到以復音詞為主提供一點有價值的資料。 論文主體分為四個部分。第一章首先確定了對《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》構詞詞素、復音詞辨識的標準，其次通過表格的形式清晰地展示出《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》構詞詞素的概貌。第二章通過對《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》構成一般復音詞（人名、地名等專有名詞和連綿詞除外）的詞素進行窮盡性的綜合分析，我們從構詞詞素和構詞詞素義兩個方面來比較分析《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》構詞詞素的構詞數(shù)量。由此可以得出一般性結論：一是《戰(zhàn)國策》構成詞素的構詞能力比《國語》的明顯增強；二是兩本專著名詞性詞素的構詞能力是最強的；三是《戰(zhàn)國策》和《國語》相比，副詞性詞素和數(shù)詞性詞素等其他類詞素都有了不同程度的發(fā)展；四是詞素項所代表的意義出現(xiàn)時間的早晚及其存在的時間長短對構詞能力會產生很大的影響。第三章通過將《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》構詞詞素位置類型比較，我們可以看出，不論是按詞素還是按詞素義考察，《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》詞素在構詞時位置都是不定位的，可前可后。第四章我們按照聯(lián)合式、偏正式、動賓式、動補式、主謂式、附加式和重疊式七種詞素的組合方式，對《國語》和《戰(zhàn)國策》中構詞方式進行比較分析可以看出：一是《國語》代表戰(zhàn)國中前期，聯(lián)合式、偏正式、動賓式、重疊式、主謂式和附加式構詞法就已經開始出現(xiàn)了，而《戰(zhàn)國策》代表的戰(zhàn)國末期開始出現(xiàn)了補充式，盡管數(shù)量比較少，但我們可以看出漢語復合詞的所有構詞方式在戰(zhàn)國末期已經初步成型；二是與《國語》相比，《戰(zhàn)國策》中的聯(lián)合式構詞法的能產性出現(xiàn)了下降的趨勢，但仍是能產性比較強的構詞法之一；三是與《國語》相比，《戰(zhàn)國策》中偏正式復合詞的能產性同樣出現(xiàn)了下降的趨勢，同其它構詞方法相比較，偏正式構詞法是最靈活的，能產量也是最高的；四是與《國語》相比，《戰(zhàn)國策》中動賓式構詞法的能產性明顯增強了，僅次于偏正式和聯(lián)合式；五是與《國語》相比，《戰(zhàn)國策》中主謂式構詞法所占比例保持未變，通查這兩個時期所代表的專書中，主謂式構詞法的能產性同樣沒有表現(xiàn)出明顯的增強趨勢，也沒有表現(xiàn)出明顯的減弱趨勢；六是與《國語》相比，，《戰(zhàn)國策》中附加式構詞法的能產性稍微呈現(xiàn)出下降的趨勢。 最后，綜合論文考察分析的結果，得出論文的結論。
[Abstract]:"Mandarin" and "warring States Policy" are important historical books of the Pre-Qin Dynasty. This paper takes the morphemes of word-formation in the period of Pre-Qin and "the Policy of warring States" as the object of study, synthesizing the quantitative and qualitative analysis of modern linguistic theories and methods. Combining synchronic and diachronic research methods, using the research results of word-forming morphemes in ancient Chinese for reference, from the number of word-formation, This paper analyzes the morphemes of word-formation in Guoyu and Zhanguo Policy, and compares the morphemes of word-formation in the two periods from a diachronic point of view. This paper provides some valuable data for the study of the transition of Chinese vocabulary from monosyllabic words to polysyllabic words. The main body of the thesis is divided into four parts. The first chapter defines the criteria for the identification of word-forming morphemes and polysyllabic words in Mandarin and Zhanguo Policy. Secondly, it clearly shows the outline of word-forming morphemes in Guoyu and Zhanguo Policy through the form of tables. In Chapter two, the general polysyllabic words (personal names) are made up of "Guoyu" and "Zhanguo Policy". With the exception of proper nouns such as place names and continuous words), the morphemes of these words are analyzed in a comprehensive and exhaustive manner. We compare and analyze the number of word-formation morphemes from the aspects of word-formation morpheme and word-formation morpheme meaning. From this, we can draw a general conclusion: first, the word-formation ability of word-forming morpheme in "warring States Policy" Compared with Mandarin, it was obviously enhanced. The second is that the two monographs have the strongest ability of word formation, the third is that the adverb morpheme and the number of morphemes have developed in different degrees compared with the "warring States Policy" and "Mandarin". Fourth, the meaning of morpheme represents the time and the time of its existence will have a great impact on the ability of word-formation. In Chapter three, we can see by comparing the location types of morpheme between Guoyu and Zhanguo Policy. In terms of morphemes or morphemes, the positions of the morphemes "Guoyu" and "the warring States Policy" are not located in word-formation, but before and after Chapter 4th, we follow the Joint, partial formal, verb-object, verb-complement, subject-predicate, and subject-predicate forms. A comparative analysis of the combination of seven morphemes in "Mandarin" and "warring States Policy" shows that: first, "Mandarin" represents the middle and early stages of the warring States period, the joint type, the partial formality, the verb-object type, and the reduplication type. Subject-predicate and adjunctive word-formation have already begun to appear, and the late warring States period, represented by the "warring States Policy", began to appear in supplementary form, although the number is relatively small. However, we can see that all the word-formation methods of Chinese compound words have taken shape at the end of the warring States period. Secondly, compared with the "Mandarin", the productive ability of the joint word-formation in the "warring States Policy" has declined. But it is still one of the most productive word-formation methods. Third, compared with the "Mandarin", the productivity of the formal compound words in the "warring States Policy" has also decreased, and compared with other word-formation methods, the partial formal word-formation method is the most flexible. Fourth, compared with the "Mandarin", the "warring States Policy" in the verb-object type of word-formation obviously enhanced, second only to the partial formal and joint; Fifthly, compared with "Mandarin", the proportion of subject-predicate word-formation in the "warring States Policy" remains unchanged, and in the special books represented in these two periods, the productivity of subject-predicate word-formation has also not shown a clear trend of enhancement. The sixth is that compared with the "Mandarin", the additive word-formation in the warring States Policy shows a slightly decreasing trend. Finally, the conclusion of the paper is drawn by synthesizing the results of the paper investigation and analysis.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H141

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 馬真;先秦復音詞初探[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1980年05期

2 李仕春;;從復音詞數(shù)據(jù)看上古漢語構詞法的發(fā)展[J];北京化工大學學報(社會科學版);2007年01期

3 楊建美;語素順序對現(xiàn)代漢語構詞的作用[J];成都師專學報;2003年03期

4 柯鎮(zhèn)昌;;近三十年《戰(zhàn)國策》研究述論[J];重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版);2010年18期

5 程湘清;試論上古漢語雙音詞和雙音詞組的區(qū)分標準[J];東岳論叢;1981年04期

6 黃志強 ,楊劍橋;論漢語詞匯雙音節(jié)化的原因[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);1990年01期

7 呂云生;論漢語并列復合詞形成的條件與原因[J];古漢語研究;1990年04期

8 趙振興;《周易》的復音詞考察[J];古漢語研究;2001年04期

9 胡運飚;從復音詞數(shù)據(jù)看詞匯復音化和構詞法的發(fā)展[J];貴州文史叢刊;1997年02期

10 趙楠;;《戰(zhàn)國策》研究歷史述評[J];衡水學院學報;2007年04期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 張鶴;《國語》研究[D];北京語言大學;2009年

本文編號：1591928