本文關(guān)鍵詞：日常言語交際中語用模糊話語的模糊性回應研究　出處：《江蘇師范大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 語用模糊 模糊性回應 人際修辭原則 交際功能

【摘要】：語用模糊是日常言語交際中廣泛存在的語言現(xiàn)象,多年來一直備受研究者的關(guān)注,相關(guān)研究涉及多個方面。但諸多研究都只是從說話者的角度單一的分析語用模糊的類型及語用功能,甚少有學者從聽話者的角度研究語用模糊。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在某些語境條件下,為實現(xiàn)某一特定語用效果或目的,聽話者會對說話者的語用模糊話語進行模糊性的回應,這種回應會影響交際的成功與否。本文在人際修辭原則的理論框架下,以美國電視連續(xù)劇《生活大爆炸》(1-6季)為語料來源,從中摘取了95段聽話者對說話者語用模糊話語采取模糊性回應的片段作為研究語料,通過定性、定量相結(jié)合的研究方法,從聽話者的角度對選取的語用模糊回應進行分析和研究,探討這些模糊性回應語用策略的類別及其在日常言語交際中的交際功能。人際修辭原則主要包括反諷原則、逗樂原則、有趣原則和樂觀原則。反諷原則指為了避免直接批評或指責對方而采取說反話的方式,既不違背禮貌原則,又能讓對方推導出其中的反諷意味;逗樂原則指為了表達與對方的親密關(guān)系而講一些不真實或不禮貌的話語;有趣原則指將一些不可預知的話來引起對方的興趣;樂觀原則指遇事要樂觀,因此將一些正面的話來寬慰對方。研究表明,聽話者對說話者語用模糊話語的模糊性回應大致分為四類,共15種語用策略。即:表達反諷的模糊性回應包括抱怨、指責、警告、嘲諷和質(zhì)疑;表達逗樂的模糊性回應包括調(diào)侃、否定和提供幫助;表達有趣的模糊性回應包括轉(zhuǎn)移話題、委婉拒絕、夸張、委婉請求和解釋;表達樂觀的模糊性回應包括安慰和承認錯誤。聽話者對說話者語用模糊話語的模糊性回應策略的交際功能可歸納為四個方面:使對話更流暢包括減小面子威脅的可能、維護交際雙方的人際關(guān)系以及自我保護;制造幽默;緩和交際氣氛包括緩和氛圍以及緩和不快與尷尬的關(guān)系;增進人際關(guān)系。因此,受話者在日常言語交往中合理運用模糊性回應進行交際,能夠掌握話語主動權(quán),有利于實現(xiàn)交際目的。
[Abstract]:Pragmatic vagueness is a widespread linguistic phenomenon in daily verbal communication, which has attracted the attention of researchers for many years. However, many studies only analyze the types and functions of pragmatic vagueness from the perspective of the speaker, and few scholars study the pragmatic vagueness from the perspective of the hearer. In some contexts, in order to achieve a specific pragmatic effect or purpose, the hearer will respond vaguely to the speaker's pragmatic vague utterances. Under the theoretical framework of interpersonal rhetoric principles, this paper takes the American TV series "Big Bang Theory" (1-6 seasons) as the source of the corpus. From the study, 95 paragraphs of the hearer's fuzzy response to the speaker's pragmatic vague utterances are taken as the research data, and the qualitative and quantitative methods are used to study them. This paper analyzes and studies the selected pragmatic vague responses from the perspective of hearers. This paper probes into the categories of these vague response pragmatic strategies and their communicative functions in daily verbal communication. The interpersonal rhetoric principles mainly include the irony principle and the amusing principle. The principle of irony refers to the use of irony in order to avoid direct criticism or criticism of the other party, which does not violate the principle of politeness and allows the other party to deduce the irony of it. The principle of amusing refers to uttering untrue or impolite words in order to express the intimate relationship with the other party; The interesting principle is to use some unpredictable words to arouse the interest of the other party; The principle of optimism refers to the need to be optimistic, so that some positive words can be used to comfort the other side. The research shows that the vague responses of hearers to the utterances of pragmatic vagueness of the speaker can be divided into four categories. There are 15 pragmatic strategies: vague responses to irony include complaints, accusations, warnings, taunts and doubts; Vague responses to teasing include ridicule, negation and help; Expressing interesting fuzzy responses includes shifting the topic, euphemistically rejecting, exaggerating, euphemistically requesting and explaining; Vague responses to optimism include comforting and admitting mistakes. The communicative functions of the hearer's fuzzy response strategy to the speaker's pragmatic vagueness can be summed up into four aspects:. Making the conversation more fluid includes the possibility of reducing face threats. Maintain interpersonal relationships and self-protection between the two parties; Creating humor; Relaxation of communicative atmosphere includes relaxation of atmosphere and the relationship between unhappiness and embarrassment; Therefore, the addressee can master the initiative of utterance and realize the purpose of communication by using fuzzy response reasonably in daily verbal communication.
【學位授予單位】：江蘇師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H030

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄧文超;;語用模糊現(xiàn)象的分類及認知功能觀[J];宜春學院學報;2008年S1期

2 龐加光;;語用含糊的認知語用分析及其語用化[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2008年04期

3 郝蕾;;語用含糊與語言順應論[J];黑龍江教育學院學報;2007年08期

4 楚行軍;;語用模糊的界定[J];長春大學學報;2006年09期

5 邵有學;;語用含糊的生成和理解[J];外語與外語教學;2006年09期

6 魏在江;;從外交語言看語用含糊[J];外語學刊;2006年02期

7 侯國金;語用含糊的標記等級和元語用意識[J];外國語(上海外國語大學學報);2005年01期

8 鮑婭;關(guān)于利奇的人際交際修辭理論與廣告的討論[J];東華大學學報(社會科學版);2004年04期

9 林波,王文斌;從認知交際看語用模糊[J];外語與外語教學;2003年08期

10 劉森林;語用策略與言語行為[J];外語教學;2003年03期

，

本文編號：1377308