【摘要】： 正如鮑德里亞(Jean·Baudrillard)在他對當今社會生產(chǎn)體系的研究中所論述的那樣,我們社會的價值交換不再依賴于馬克思社會必要勞動時間的假說,而是依靠某種象征性的觀念(鮑德里亞,2006.4)①。憑借這一點,我們可以認為我們步入了一個“概念(Concept)”的時代,即事物的生產(chǎn)在很大程度上不再依賴于實體的事物,而是依靠對事物概念的重新創(chuàng)造。事實上,我們可以在我們社會中眾多的職業(yè)門類中出現(xiàn)的新現(xiàn)象來印證這一觀點。無論是在廣告?zhèn)髅筋I(lǐng)域、房地產(chǎn)策劃領(lǐng)域、商品包裝領(lǐng)域、建筑設(shè)計領(lǐng)域甚至當代藝術(shù)所推崇的創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)領(lǐng)域,“概念”一詞都是這些領(lǐng)域從業(yè)的核心詞匯。 然而,什么是概念?我們可以在我們所熟悉的建筑設(shè)計的話語中找到一些的和“概念”相近似的詞匯,例如“觀念(notion)”、“想法(idea)”、“創(chuàng)造(creativity)”等。那么這些詞和概念是一個意思么,或者它們之間又有什么樣的關(guān)系?這個問題也許只有在更晚的時候提出,涉及到對這個問題正面研究的文獻也并不多。因此本文很難從已有的歷史文獻中找出龐證博引來說明我們找到了一條“概念”之道,按照這條道路我們通向了建筑設(shè)計的絕對正確的創(chuàng)造性的地方。但我們至少可以通過對已有觀念和現(xiàn)象的分析,來說明什么不是“概念的”;或者找出我們建筑設(shè)計工作中,在使用“概念”時哪些問題和概念相關(guān),哪些問題并不涉及到“概念”即我們認為的統(tǒng)治了建筑設(shè)計工作的那個概念;或者分析哪些情況下對概念的使用是合適的即理性的、符合我們認知觀念的,哪些又不是…… 總之,與其說本文的寫作是對“概念創(chuàng)作”的直接研究,還不如說是在我們所面臨的“概念時代”的背景下,以概念的角度來研究建筑設(shè)計中話語、形象、表達等具體工作如何更加理性進行的一種嘗試。本著這一態(tài)度,本文首先從少量的涉及到“概念”的哲學(xué)認識論(Epistemology)中整理出筆者所認識的概念,對其進行大致的描述;然后通過對這一概念的定義去考察在建筑設(shè)計中話語和圖像的建構(gòu)方式,并指出我們通常所理解的“解釋”和“符號”與概念之間的關(guān)系與區(qū)別,同時提出如何以更理性的方式在概念中對其掌握和運用。最后提出建筑設(shè)計中創(chuàng)作概念過程的模型,并嘗試著指出判斷“概念”的方法。
[Abstract]:As Baudrillard (Jean Baudrillard) argued in his study of the production system of today's society, the exchange of values in our society no longer depends on the hypothesis that Marx must work time in society. It relies on a symbolic concept (Baudrillard 2004. 4) 1. By virtue of this, we can think that we have stepped into the era of "concept (Concept)", that is, the production of things no longer depends on physical things to a great extent, but on the re-creation of the concept of things. In fact, we can confirm this view by new phenomena in many professional categories in our society. Whether in the field of advertising media, real estate planning, commodity packaging, architectural design or even the creative industry, the word "concept" is the core word in these fields. However, what is a concept? We can find some words which are similar to "concept" in the familiar words of architectural design, such as "idea (notion)", "idea (idea)", "create (creativity)" and so on. So are these words and concepts the same meaning, or what is the relationship between them? The question may only be raised later, and there is not much literature on positive research on the issue. Therefore, it is difficult for this paper to find out from the existing historical documents that we have found a way of "concept", according to which we lead to the absolutely correct creative place of architectural design. But we can at least explain what is not "conceptual" by analyzing existing ideas and phenomena, or find out which problems are relevant to concepts when we use them in our architectural design work. Which problems do not relate to "concept", that is, the concept that we think governs the architectural design work, or to analyze which conditions are suitable for the use of the concept, that is, rational, consistent with our cognitive concept, and which are not. In a word, the writing of this paper is not so much a direct study of "conceptual creation" as a study of discourse and image in architectural design from a conceptual perspective under the background of the "concept age" we are facing. An attempt at how to be more rational in specific work, such as expression. Based on this attitude, this paper first from a small number of philosophical epistemology involved in the "concept" (Epistemology) collate the author's understanding of the concept, to carry out a general description of it; Then through the definition of this concept to examine the construction of discourse and image in architectural design, and point out the relationship and difference between "interpretation" and "symbol" and concept, which we usually understand. At the same time, it puts forward how to master and apply it in a more rational way. Finally, the model of conceptual process in architectural design is put forward, and the method of judging "concept" is tried to be pointed out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：TU201

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫海音;當代城市居住空間布景研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2178601