本文選題：媒體監(jiān)督 + 再監(jiān)督�。� 參考：《北京郵電大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)化媒體的出現(xiàn)和新媒體時(shí)代的到來(lái),媒體監(jiān)督借用新技術(shù)的發(fā)展,越來(lái)越發(fā)揮著作為“第四種權(quán)力”的功用。媒體監(jiān)督作為對(duì)公權(quán)力的一種監(jiān)督方式,在理論和實(shí)踐研究不斷深入的同時(shí),媒體監(jiān)督的失范現(xiàn)象也逐漸顯現(xiàn)。尤其是在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,各種社會(huì)矛盾和利益多元化沖突明顯,出現(xiàn)了媒體監(jiān)督的異化。媒體監(jiān)督本來(lái)是代表民眾形成對(duì)公權(quán)力的制約,但卻利用這種“委托—代理”關(guān)系生成“權(quán)力”為自己謀利,形成了一種外在于媒體監(jiān)督本身的異己力量。社會(huì)化媒體的興起和發(fā)展,媒體監(jiān)督的不端行為已然不限于“四大公害”,而呈現(xiàn)出多樣化的趨勢(shì),文中將不端行為分為五種類型來(lái)進(jìn)行探討,虛假新聞,有償新聞和惡意廣告是較為常見(jiàn)的媒體越軌行為,還有一些媒體的冷漠化、娛樂(lè)化、經(jīng)濟(jì)化、權(quán)力化等現(xiàn)象形成了媒體的內(nèi)容隨意化,而且出現(xiàn)綁架民意的現(xiàn)象,諸多事實(shí)的背后反映出媒體監(jiān)督的社會(huì)監(jiān)測(cè)等功能的失調(diào),媒體作為社會(huì)公器的職能的缺位和越位,媒體行業(yè)范圍內(nèi)倫理失范,從大制度環(huán)境下考慮,相關(guān)制度的缺失直接造成不端行為不能得到很好的治理。 對(duì)媒體監(jiān)督進(jìn)行監(jiān)督的呼聲日益高漲,而且我國(guó)有比較完善的監(jiān)督主體可以實(shí)施對(duì)媒體監(jiān)督的再監(jiān)督,但是由于再監(jiān)督的乏力,缺位,異化等問(wèn)題,阻礙了再監(jiān)督功能的實(shí)現(xiàn),不能很好的監(jiān)督媒體使之更好地發(fā)揮媒體監(jiān)督的作用。因而,本課題旨在通過(guò)對(duì)媒體監(jiān)督過(guò)程中的不端行為進(jìn)行分析,在再監(jiān)督的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建較為完善的再監(jiān)督機(jī)制,主要從制度安排、政府管理、社會(huì)監(jiān)督、行業(yè)自律四個(gè)主體進(jìn)行論述,希望從每個(gè)主體的職責(zé)范圍出發(fā)去探索再監(jiān)督機(jī)制建設(shè)的構(gòu)成要件,在主體功能發(fā)揮的同時(shí)要實(shí)現(xiàn)各主體之間職責(zé)和功能的有效契合和協(xié)調(diào),從而形成一個(gè)整體的機(jī)制發(fā)揮作用。因而,不論從再監(jiān)督機(jī)制的構(gòu)成主體還是相互關(guān)系上進(jìn)行相關(guān)的制度設(shè)計(jì)和理論闡述,希望可以在構(gòu)建再監(jiān)督機(jī)制的同時(shí),借鑒國(guó)外制約媒體不端行為的方式和方法,不斷地實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)媒體的自律和對(duì)媒體的治理。當(dāng)然在這個(gè)過(guò)程中,媒體面臨著自身政治媒介、公共媒介和商業(yè)媒介的身份博弈,國(guó)家職能在逐漸消減的同時(shí),社會(huì)在不斷地成長(zhǎng),一個(gè)具有影響意義的公共領(lǐng)域正在形成,在這個(gè)公共空間中,人們需要通過(guò)媒介實(shí)現(xiàn)自身利益的表達(dá),同時(shí)也需要有一種完善的機(jī)制保證表達(dá)的真實(shí)和順暢,再監(jiān)督機(jī)制就是為了最大限度的保證媒體監(jiān)督作用的發(fā)揮,但是同時(shí)不為權(quán)力主導(dǎo)而僭越自己的職責(zé)。從而讓媒體把握公共領(lǐng)域的“公共話語(yǔ)權(quán)”,實(shí)現(xiàn)公民的意志自由和利益表達(dá),進(jìn)一步促進(jìn)公民社會(huì)的成長(zhǎng),推動(dòng)民主化進(jìn)程。
[Abstract]:With the emergence of social media and the arrival of new media era, the development of media supervision and borrowing new technology is playing a more and more important role as "the fourth power". Media supervision as a way to supervise the public power, in the theoretical and practical research continues to deepen, the media supervision of the phenomenon also gradually appeared. Especially in the period of social transformation, various social contradictions and multiple conflicts of interests are obvious, and the alienation of media supervision appears. Media supervision originally formed restriction on public power on behalf of the public, but it used this kind of "principal-agent" relationship to generate "power" for its own profit, forming a kind of dissident force outside media supervision itself. With the rise and development of social media, the misbehavior of media supervision is no longer limited to the "four public hazards", but shows a diversified trend. In this paper, misbehavior can be divided into five types to discuss, false news, Paid news and malicious advertising are more common media deviant behavior, there are some media indifference, entertainment, economy, power and other phenomena formed the content of the media at will, and the phenomenon of kidnapping public opinion. Many facts reflect the maladjustment of social monitoring and other functions of media supervision, the absence and offside of the function of media as a public instrument, the loss of ethics in the media industry, and the consideration of the large institutional environment. The lack of relevant system directly results in improper behavior can not be well managed. The voice of media supervision is rising day by day, and our country has more perfect supervisory subject to carry out the re-supervision of media supervision. However, due to the weakness, absence, alienation and other problems of re-supervision, it hinders the realization of re-supervision function. Not very good supervision of the media to better play the role of media supervision. Therefore, the purpose of this subject is to analyze the misconduct in the process of media supervision, on the basis of the development of re-supervision, to build a more perfect mechanism of re-supervision, mainly from the system arrangement, government management, social supervision. This paper discusses the four subjects of industry self-discipline, hoping to explore the constitutive elements of the construction of re-supervision mechanism from the scope of responsibility of each subject, and to realize the effective agreement and coordination between the duties and functions of each subject while the main body functions are being brought into play. Thus forming a whole mechanism to play a role. Therefore, whether from the composition of the re-supervision mechanism or from the relationship between the relevant system design and theoretical elaboration, I hope to construct the re-supervision mechanism, at the same time, learn from the foreign ways and methods of restricting media misconduct. Continuously realize our country media self-discipline and the management of media. Of course, in this process, the media are confronted with the identity game of their own political media, public media and commercial media. While the functions of the state are gradually diminishing, the society is constantly growing, and a public sphere of influence is forming. In this public space, people need to realize the expression of their own interests through the media. At the same time, they also need a perfect mechanism to ensure the truth and smoothness of expression. The mechanism of supervision is to maximize the role of media supervision. But at the same time, they do not overdo their duties for power. Thus, the media can grasp the "public discourse right" in the public sphere, realize the free will and interest expression of citizens, further promote the growth of civil society and promote the process of democratization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D630.9;G206

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳力丹;自由主義理論和社會(huì)責(zé)任論[J];當(dāng)代傳播;2003年03期

2 陳力丹;張勇鋒;;2011年我國(guó)新聞傳播學(xué)的12個(gè)新鮮話題[J];當(dāng)代傳播;2012年01期

3 言中;;以非營(yíng)利組織視角反思新聞媒體的經(jīng)營(yíng)傾向[J];中國(guó)廣播電視學(xué)刊;2010年09期

4 孟威;;從“英國(guó)騷亂”看新媒體的自由與監(jiān)管[J];當(dāng)代世界;2011年09期

5 王芳菲;;新聞媒體需要有限制性的言論自由——讀《言論自由的反諷》[J];世紀(jì)橋;2009年09期

6 邱立楠;;西方媒體第四權(quán)力生成邏輯探析[J];新聞世界;2009年12期

7 唐國(guó)忠;;善解善待善用善管新聞媒體[J];求是;2008年03期

8 陳力丹;董晨宇;;提升新聞報(bào)道中弱勢(shì)群體的尊嚴(yán)指數(shù)[J];新聞實(shí)踐;2010年05期

9 謝清果;張漢麗;;臺(tái)灣新聞自由與民眾監(jiān)督的博弈與出路——從《蘋果日?qǐng)?bào)》的“動(dòng)新聞”事件說(shuō)起[J];臺(tái)灣研究集刊;2011年03期

10 劉照龍;戴小泉;;“輿論監(jiān)督”與“監(jiān)督輿論”的辯證關(guān)系[J];聲屏世界;2011年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 任銘;陳俊鑫;;我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情及管理策略研究[A];2011年全國(guó)通信安全學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1834175