中國論辯型談話節(jié)目的發(fā)展研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-18 23:25
本文選題:論辯 + 談話節(jié)目; 參考:《山西大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文
【摘要】:隨著《實(shí)話實(shí)說》欄目的開播,我國論辯型談話節(jié)目伴隨著電視談話節(jié)目如雨后春筍般蓬勃發(fā)展起來。在主持人的引導(dǎo)和把控下,論辯型談話節(jié)目主要針對事先設(shè)置好的辯論議題,并以差別化的方式展開沖突,在雙方隊(duì)伍爭論抗辯的過程中,實(shí)現(xiàn)意見與觀點(diǎn)的碰撞、交流,使人們的思想更加深刻,豐富,活躍,多元。我國論辯型談話節(jié)目可謂在發(fā)展中前進(jìn),并在發(fā)展過程中涌現(xiàn)出許多優(yōu)點(diǎn),例如:把握社會熱點(diǎn),反映時代脈絡(luò);話題大眾化,滿足平民需求;用動態(tài)的沖突撞擊構(gòu)造話語空間等。電視作為一種文化載體,其社會協(xié)調(diào)功能尤為重要,因此,我國目前的論辯型談話節(jié)目為協(xié)調(diào)社會矛盾、引導(dǎo)群眾輿論做出了相應(yīng)的貢獻(xiàn),滿足了平民百姓表達(dá)觀點(diǎn)和溝通意見的精神愿望。在二十多年中,論辯型談話節(jié)目取得了一定的成就,但是一些發(fā)展問題和弊端仍然存在,例如:節(jié)目不同程度具有導(dǎo)向迷失現(xiàn)象;二元對立結(jié)構(gòu)使得多元價值觀被排斥;論辯結(jié)果沒有達(dá)成一致;公共話語空間中仍存在隱性權(quán)力等,這些問題在不同程度上制約了公民權(quán)利的實(shí)現(xiàn)和話語的表達(dá)。而2014年愛奇藝上線的網(wǎng)絡(luò)論辯節(jié)目《奇葩說》憑借精準(zhǔn)的受眾定位,新穎的內(nèi)容設(shè)計(jì),獨(dú)特的互動方式,成為不溫不火的論辯型談話節(jié)目的一縷春風(fēng)。因此為該類節(jié)目今后的長遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展提出了新的對策:恰當(dāng)設(shè)置節(jié)目議題,降低隱性權(quán)力,創(chuàng)新互動的溝通方式,加大品牌構(gòu)建,量身植入廣告。
[Abstract]:With the opening of the "tell the truth" program, the argumentative talk show in our country is booming along with the television talk program.Under the guidance and control of the host, the argumentative talk show mainly aims at the pre-set debate topics, and conflicts with each other in a differentiated manner, realizing the collision and exchange of opinions and opinions in the process of arguing and defending between the two teams.Make people's thought more profound, rich, active, pluralistic.The argumentative talk shows in our country can be described as advancing in the development process, and many advantages emerge in the process of development, such as grasping the social hot spots, reflecting the context of the times, popularizing the topics and meeting the needs of the common people.The dynamic collision is used to construct the discourse space and so on.As a kind of cultural carrier, TV plays a very important role in social coordination. Therefore, the current argumentative talk shows in our country have made corresponding contributions to the coordination of social contradictions and the guidance of public opinion.It satisfies the common people's spiritual desire to express their views and communicate their opinions.In more than 20 years, the argumentative talk show has made some achievements, but some development problems and drawbacks still exist. For example, the program has the phenomenon of "leading to lose" in different degrees, the dual opposition structure makes the pluralistic values excluded;There is no consensus in the debate; there still exists hidden power in the public discourse space, which restricts the realization of civil rights and the expression of discourse to varying degrees.In 2014, iqiyi's online debate program, "fantastic work Theory", with its accurate audience orientation, novel content design and unique interactive way, has become a spring breeze of the unheated argumentation talk show.Therefore, this paper puts forward some new countermeasures for the future long-term development of this kind of programs: properly setting up program topics, reducing hidden power, innovating interactive communication methods, increasing brand construction, and placing advertisements.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:G222
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 喬衛(wèi);芻議視聽談話節(jié)目的若干要素[J];當(dāng)代電視;2000年S7期
2 談列兵;影視劇談話節(jié)目的策劃[J];電視研究;2001年11期
3 吳蔭培;農(nóng)民說 說農(nóng)民——農(nóng)民談話節(jié)目《村長辦事處》印象[J];當(dāng)代電視;2002年11期
4 尹興軍;為交流溝通搭建平臺——關(guān)于農(nóng)民談話節(jié)目的思考[J];當(dāng)代電視;2002年11期
5 周吉士;談話節(jié)目是旗幟[J];視聽界;2002年05期
6 黃榮;淺談耶魯學(xué)派說服理論在談話節(jié)目中的應(yīng)用與延伸[J];烏魯木齊職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期
7 王婷;;"談話",并非談話節(jié)目的專利——《講述》節(jié)目主持語境[J];電視研究;2004年11期
8 鮑海波;;電視人文談話節(jié)目中的價值守望[J];電視研究;2004年12期
9 陳愛華;張靜;;敘事型談話節(jié)目與討論型談話節(jié)目之比較[J];山東視聽;2004年11期
10 高f,
本文編號:1770566
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/guanggaoshejilunwen/1770566.html
最近更新
教材專著