本文關(guān)鍵詞： 贏家通吃 過度自信 律師收入 兩極分化　出處：《東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：劉翔在04年雅典奧運(yùn)會(huì)男子110米欄比賽中獲得冠軍并打破了奧運(yùn)會(huì)記錄,所有人都沉浸在興奮和喜悅的氛圍中,沒有人留意到亞軍——美國名將特倫斯·特拉梅爾眼角流露出的一絲落寞和失望。盡管他們的差距只是區(qū)區(qū)的0.27秒,前者隨之而來的是數(shù)百萬計(jì)的廣告代言費(fèi),后者卻很快被世人遺忘。這種以相對表現(xiàn)而非絕對表現(xiàn)定獎(jiǎng)酬,并且獎(jiǎng)酬很容易集中在少數(shù)幾個(gè)頂尖的杰出人才手中的現(xiàn)象就稱為“贏家通吃”。 “贏家通吃”的酬賞制度在演藝界、體壇、藝術(shù)圈內(nèi)早已普遍行之。但今天,它已滲透到我們經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)里其他的眾多層面,譬如司法、醫(yī)學(xué)、高等教育、銀行投資、時(shí)裝、出版、媒體以及企業(yè)管理人員等各個(gè)領(lǐng)域。我國的律師行業(yè)就是這樣一個(gè)“贏家通吃”市場,業(yè)內(nèi)的“二八定律”將這一現(xiàn)象描述得更加具體：80%的案源,被20%的律師占有,20%律師的創(chuàng)收,占有律師行業(yè)的80%。這就不可避免的使律師行業(yè)形成一個(gè)金字塔的形狀：處在塔尖的少部分人掌握了業(yè)內(nèi)的大部分資源,而處在塔底的大部分人卻為了僅剩的資源展開了激烈的競爭。這樣不僅使我國律師收入產(chǎn)生嚴(yán)重的兩極分化,更降低了社會(huì)資源的實(shí)際利用效率,沒有達(dá)到最優(yōu)化配置的目的。 本文通過分析贏家通吃市場的特點(diǎn)以及產(chǎn)生的原因,進(jìn)而探究我國法律服務(wù)行業(yè)中律師收入兩極分化的主要根源,最后再針對這些現(xiàn)象得出結(jié)論和含義。本文的目的不僅是分析我國律師收入的“贏家通吃”現(xiàn)狀,更是想通過各方的努力,消除或削弱“贏家通吃”所導(dǎo)致的兩極分化程度,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)“共贏”的狀態(tài)。
[Abstract]:Liu Xiang in the 04 Athens Olympic Games men's 110 meter hurdles champion and broke the Olympic record, all people are immersed in the excitement and joy of the atmosphere, no one noticed a runner - U.S. champion Terence Tramel eyes showing the desolation and despair. Although the difference was a mere 0.27 seconds, the former there are millions of advertising endorsement fees, the latter was soon forgotten. The relative performance rather than absolute performance will reward, and reward is very easy to concentrate on a few top outstanding talents in the hands of the phenomenon is known as the "winner".
"Winner" reward system in the entertainment industry, sports, art circle has long been common for. But today, it has penetrated into many other aspects, such as the US economic and social justice, medicine, higher education, investment banking, fashion, publishing, various fields of media and business managers. I like the legal profession is just a "winner" market, the "28 law" will be a more specific description of the phenomenon: 80% cases, 20% were lawyers possession, the 20% lawyer's income, possession of lawyer 80%. which can not avoid the lawyer industry form the shape of a Pyramid: at the tip of the few people who mastered most of the resources industry, and most of the people in the bottom of the tower is a fierce competition for the remaining resources. This not only makes the lawyer income polarization is serious, but also reduces the The actual utilization efficiency of social resources has not reached the goal of optimal allocation.
This paper analyzes the characteristics of winner take all market and the reasons, and then explore the main source of China's legal service industry lawyer income polarization, finally draws the conclusion in view of these phenomena and meaning. The purpose of this paper is not only the analysis of China's lawyer income "winner" situation, more is to through the efforts of all parties, eliminate or weaken the degree of polarization of winner "caused by, so as to achieve a" win-win "state.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 本刊編輯部;潘勤;;向著正義前行[J];江淮法治;2010年08期

2 潘志洪;;論贏家通吃[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2005年05期

3 張亞;贏家通吃與市場競爭[J];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;1999年12期

4 汪丁丁;行為、意義與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年09期

5 任紅;應(yīng)愛娜;;馬太效應(yīng)——社會(huì)分層的催化劑[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2007年06期

6 徐偉;于吶洋;;中國律師業(yè)生存現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查[J];晚報(bào)文萃;2008年13期

7 陳守明;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中的“贏家通吃”現(xiàn)象與企業(yè)對策[J];外國經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;1999年11期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本版編輯邋徐偉 講述者 湖北律師 吳建寶 記錄者 本報(bào)記者 于吶洋 袁定波;[N];法制日報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張偉;“超女”類選秀的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1516088