篇名： 相關(guān)期刊論文中以“Meta分析”冠名的中醫(yī)藥文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量分析

TITLE：

摘要： 目的：了解我國(guó)中醫(yī)藥相關(guān)循證研究開(kāi)展情況。方法：計(jì)算機(jī)檢索相關(guān)期刊論文中篇名含“Meta分析”“薈萃分析”“Meta analysis”等且中圖分類(lèi)號(hào)為“R2（中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)）”的文獻(xiàn)，檢索時(shí)限為該數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)建庫(kù)起至2017年12月，從發(fā)文年份、來(lái)源期刊、發(fā)表機(jī)構(gòu)、作者、合作發(fā)表、基金資助和研究?jī)?nèi)容等方面進(jìn)行文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量分析。結(jié)果：共納入論文1 540篇，來(lái)源于321個(gè)期刊，最早的論文發(fā)表于1997年；第一作者來(lái)自494個(gè)機(jī)構(gòu)，主要分布在我國(guó)內(nèi)地機(jī)構(gòu)，發(fā)文最多的為廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)（94篇）；依照普萊斯定律計(jì)算有25位核心作者，共計(jì)發(fā)文157篇；論文合著率為95.1％、合作度為4.00；32.3％的論文得到基金資助，其中國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金資助論文236篇；論文包括5個(gè)類(lèi)型，其中應(yīng)用研究1 512篇、質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)14篇、方法學(xué)研究6篇，應(yīng)用研究涉及的病種達(dá)到17個(gè)大類(lèi)。結(jié)論：Meta分析在我國(guó)中醫(yī)藥科研中的應(yīng)用發(fā)展迅速，但其相關(guān)理論研究還較為欠缺，應(yīng)該進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)方法學(xué)研究，以更好地推進(jìn)中醫(yī)藥循證研究的發(fā)展。

ABSTRACT： OBJECTIVE： To investigate the development of related TCM evidence-based researches in China.METHODS：The literatures titled “Meta-analysis” and those with Chinese Library Classification Number of “R2 （Chinese Medicine）” were searched from CJFD by computer. The retrieval time limit ranged from database establishment to Dec. 2017. Bibliometrics analysis was performed in respects of year of publication， source journals， publishers， authors， co-authors， funding and research content.RESULTS： A total of 1 540 papers from 321 journals were included， and the first paper was published in 1997；the first author came from 494 institutions which mainly distributed within the mainland institations of China. Guangzhou University of TCM had the largest number of publications. According to Price’s law， there were 25 core authors who published 157 literature in total；the co-authoring rate was 95.1％ and the collaborating degree was 4.00. 32.3％ of the papers were obtained by the fund support，，involving 236 literatured founded by National Science Foundation of China. There were 5 types of papers， including 1 512 applied research papers， 14 quality evaluation papers， 6 methodological studies； there were 17 categories of diseases involved in applied research. CONCLUSIONS： Meta-analysis of TCM research in China has developed rapidly， but related theoretical research is relatively lack. It is necessary to further strengthen the methodology research so as to promote the development of evidence-based research of TCM.

期刊： 2018年第29卷第20期

作者： 徐蘊(yùn)，王會(huì)梅，黃芳，李瑋彤

AUTHORS： XU Yun，WANG Huimei，HUANG Fang，LI Weitong

關(guān)鍵字： Meta分析；中醫(yī)藥；文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量學(xué)；核心作者

KEYWORDS： Meta-analysis； TCM； Bibliometric method； Core author

總下載數(shù)： 3 次

本日下載數(shù)： 1次

本月下載數(shù)： 3次

文件大小： 619.60Kb

* 注：未經(jīng)本站明確許可，任何網(wǎng)站不得非法盜鏈資源下載連接及抄襲本站原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容資源!在此感謝您的支持與合作！