人際尊重的概念在語(yǔ)用學(xué)領(lǐng)域廣為應(yīng)用卻幾乎沒(méi)有專門的研究。尊重與身份息息相關(guān),從身份構(gòu)建角度出發(fā)可以為人際尊重研究提供更多的思考。鑒于此,本研究嘗試從人際尊重出發(fā),分析公共場(chǎng)合下的他人職業(yè)身份重塑�；趤�(lái)自電視節(jié)目《你會(huì)怎么做》的24個(gè)語(yǔ)料,本研究旨在探討旁觀者如何回應(yīng)過(guò)錯(cuò)方的不尊重行為,以重塑受害者的職業(yè)身份(包括職業(yè)角色和職業(yè)能力)。根據(jù)語(yǔ)料所呈現(xiàn)的干預(yù)者關(guān)于尊重的元語(yǔ)用話語(yǔ),本研究將人際尊重界定為一種道德秩序,關(guān)乎對(duì)他人職業(yè)身份的價(jià)值認(rèn)可。尊重的道德秩序包括兩個(gè)核心內(nèi)涵,分別是平等和寬容。換言之,在公共場(chǎng)合下,遵守尊重的道德秩序,要求滿足平等和寬容兩個(gè)內(nèi)涵。平等指的是對(duì)他人的職業(yè)角色一視同仁。寬容指的是接受他人目前的失敗表現(xiàn),并期待他人工作能力的的變化和發(fā)展。為此,本研究以尊重的道德秩序和身份構(gòu)建模型(Bucholtz and Hall 2005)為理論依據(jù),致力于回答以下三個(gè)研究問(wèn)題:(1)過(guò)錯(cuò)方如何不尊重受害者的職業(yè)身份?(2)干預(yù)者如何應(yīng)對(duì)這些過(guò)錯(cuò)行為,以重塑受害者的職業(yè)身份?(3)為什么干預(yù)者會(huì)對(duì)這些過(guò)錯(cuò)行為做出反應(yīng)?通過(guò)對(duì)三個(gè)研究問(wèn)題的討論,本研究得出了以下結(jié)論。第一,根...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：90 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
CHAPTER ONE GENERAL INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Research object
    1.2 Significance of the present study
    1.3 Research objectives and research questions
    1.4 Data and methodology
        1.4.1 About the data
        1.4.2 Analysis procedures
    1.5 Organization of this thesis
CHAPTER TWO REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE
    2.1 Overview
    2.2 Definitions of professional identity
    2.3 Approaches to studies on identity construction
        2.3.1 Social psychological approaches to identity construction
        2.3.2 Pragmatic approaches to identity construction
    2.4 Previous studies related to identity and respect
    2.5 Achievements and limitations of prior studies
    2.6 Summary
CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    3.1 Overview
    3.2 Working definition of respect
    3.3 Bucholtz and Hall’s Identity Construction Model
    3.4 The analytical framework applied to this thesis
    3.5 Summary
CHAPTER FOUR WRONGDOERS’DISRESPECTFUL BEHAVIORS TOWARDS OTHER-PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY IN PUBLIC PLACES
    4.1 Overview
    4.2 Construction of victims as outsiders with lower social status
        4.2.1 Overtly mentioning inferior identity
        4.2.2 Projecting an unequal status hierarchy
    4.3 Construction of victims as incompetents
        4.3.1 Underestimating victims’professional knowledge
        4.3.2 Exaggerating victims’mistakes
    4.4 Summary
CHAPTER FIVE INTERVENERS’OTHER-PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY RECONSTRUCTIONIN PUBLIC PLACES
    5.1 Overview
    5.2 Reconstruction of victims as insiders with equal social status
        5.2.1 Negating wrongdoers’assumed superior identity
        5.2.2 Aligning with victims
    5.3 Reconstruction of victims as competents
        5.3.1 Stating the constraints on victims’professional performance
        5.3.2 Minimizing victims’mistakes
    5.4 Summary
CHAPTER SIX PRAGMATIC MOTIVATIONS OF INTERVENERS’OTHER-PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY RECONSTRUCTION IN PUBLIC PLACES
    6.1 Overview
    6.2 Other-professional identity reconstruction as a means of restoringnorms of respect
        6.2.1 Equality-oriented other-professional identity reconstruction
        6.2.2 Tolerance-oriented other-professional identity reconstruction
    6.3 Summary
CHAPTER SEVEN CONCLUSIONS
    7.1 Overview
    7.2 Major findings
    7.3 Major implications for future research
    7.4 Limitations
REFERENCES
APPENDIX



本文編號(hào)：3895600