復(fù)合謂詞的語(yǔ)義特征及構(gòu)式化特征探究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2021-10-18 14:42
復(fù)合謂詞指Have/Take/Make/Give/Do+A+NDEV這樣的結(jié)構(gòu)。具體如:have a look,take a walk,make a tour,等。以往的相關(guān)研究（Stein 1991;Algeo 1995:204）認(rèn)為,復(fù)合謂詞表達(dá)的句法功能、語(yǔ)義功能與其對(duì)應(yīng)的行為動(dòng)詞（如look,walk,tour）相同。復(fù)合謂詞表現(xiàn)出某種半詞匯化-半語(yǔ)法化的句法、語(yǔ)義功能特征（Brinton2008:33-53）,它們同時(shí)表達(dá)“有界體標(biāo)記”語(yǔ)法功能（Traugott&Trausdale 2013:34-35）。然而,關(guān)于復(fù)合謂詞還有一些基本語(yǔ)義功能特征,在此前的國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究中尚未涉及。具體如,復(fù)合謂詞的構(gòu)式義、轉(zhuǎn)喻義、構(gòu)式化特征等。本研究主要探究以下議題:1)復(fù)合謂詞表達(dá)哪些語(yǔ)義功能?復(fù)合謂詞表現(xiàn)出怎樣的句法-語(yǔ)義功能?本研究揭示的復(fù)合謂詞的語(yǔ)義功能與前人的研究有何不同?2)為什么說(shuō)復(fù)合謂詞屬于雙層語(yǔ)法轉(zhuǎn)喻而非單層轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象?作為語(yǔ)法轉(zhuǎn)喻,復(fù)合謂詞中涉及的轉(zhuǎn)喻操作是怎樣的?3)復(fù)合謂詞為什么可視為一種構(gòu)式?復(fù)合謂詞表現(xiàn)出怎樣的構(gòu)式化特征?5個(gè)復(fù)合謂詞...
【文章來(lái)源】：廣州大學(xué)廣東省
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：137 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background Introduction to Composite Predicates
1.2 Issues of This Thesis
1.3 Purposes and Significances of This Thesis
1.3.1 Purposes of This Thesis
1.3.2 Significances of This Thesis
1.4 Organization of The Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Study of Composite Predicates Abroad
2.2 Domestic Study of Composite Predicates
2.3 Comments on Previous Studies of Composite Predicates
2.3.1 The Advantages of Previous Studies
2.3.2 The Features of Previous Studies
2.3.3 The Disadvantages of Previous Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 A Brief Introduction to the History and Development of Metonymy
3.1.1 Various Definitions of Conceptual Metonymy
3.1.1.1 Rhetorical View on Metonymy
3.1.1.2 Cognitive View on Metonymy
3.2 Classifications of Metonymy
3.3 Grammatical Metonymy and Its Features
3.3.1 Grammatical Metonymy
3.3.2 Features of Grammatical Metonymy
3.4 Constructionalization Theory(CT)
3.4.1 A Brief Introduction to CT
3.4.2 The Main Idea of CT
3.4.3 The Features of CT
Chapter Four Methodology of This Thesis
4.1 An Introduction to British National Corpus(BNC)
4.2 Design of the Research
4.3 Methods of Measuring Schematicity,Productivity and Compositionality
4.3.1 Method of Measuring the Schematicity
4.3.2 Method of Measuring the Productivity
4.3.3 Method of Measuring the Compositionality
4.4 The Criteria of Classification of N_(DEV) in Composite Predicates
4.4.1 Classification of N_(DEV) Based on Original Verb Meanings
4.4.2 Classification of N_(DEV) Based on Behavior Features of Verbs
Chapter Five The Metonymic Feature,Construction Features,Syntactic-Semantic Features and the Constructionalization Characteristics of Composite Predicates
5.1 The Metonymic Operation Model of Composite Predicates
5.2 The Construction Features of Composite Predicate
5.2.1 The Definition of Construction
5.2.2 The Causes of Composite Predicates Being Viewed as Constructions
5.3 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) of Composite predicates
5.3.1 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Have+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.1.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Have+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.1.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Have+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.1.3 The Semantic Features of Have and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Have+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.2 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Take+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.2.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Take+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.2.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Take+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.2.3 The Semantic Features of Take and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Take+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.3 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Make+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.3.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Make+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.3.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Make+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.3.3 The Semantic Features of Make and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Make+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.4 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Give+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.4.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Give+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.4.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Give+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.4.3 The Semantic Features of Give and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Give+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.5 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Do+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.5.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Do+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.5.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Do+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.5.3 The Semantic Features of Do and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Do+A+N_(DEV)
5.4 Comparative Analysis of N_(DEV) amidst Different Composite Predicates
5.4.1 Similarities and Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.1.1 The Similarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.1.2 The Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.2 Similarities and Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.4.2.1 The Similarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.4.2.2 The Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.5 The Constructionalization Characteristics of Composite Predicates
5.5.1 The Schematicity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.1.1 Definitions of Schematicity
5.5.1.2 The Schematicity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.1.3 Different Degrees of Schematicity Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.2 The Productivity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.2.1 Definition and Criteria of Productivity
5.5.2.2 Different Degrees of Productivity Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.3 The Compositionality of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.3.1 Definition and Criteria of Compositionality
5.5.3.2 Different Degrees of Compositionality Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.6 Comparative Analysis of Schematicity,Productivity and Compositionality of the Five Composite Predicates
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings of This Thesis
6.2 Implications of This Thesis
6.3 Limitations of This Study and Suggestions for Further Research
6.3.1 Limitations of This Study
6.3.2 Suggestions for Further Research on Composite Predicates
References
碩士研究生在校期間科研成果清單
【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]《水滸傳》中108將綽號(hào)的轉(zhuǎn)喻研究[J]. 謝彥君. 佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2019(01)
[2]復(fù)雜轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象探析[J]. 席建國(guó). 佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2019(01)
[3]《構(gòu)式化與構(gòu)式演變》介紹[J]. Elizabeth C.Traugott,Graeme Trousdale,黃勁偉. 當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué). 2018(01)
[4]英語(yǔ)輕動(dòng)詞與動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)名詞搭配特征研究——基于“詞匯體”分布的實(shí)證研究[J]. 曾天嬌,賈冠杰. 外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2017(06)
[5]淺析英語(yǔ)中的輕動(dòng)詞結(jié)構(gòu)[J]. 戴婷婷. 廣東蠶業(yè). 2017(03)
[6]Have a NDev結(jié)構(gòu)之語(yǔ)法轉(zhuǎn)喻及構(gòu)式化特征考察[J]. 席建國(guó),王文斌. 外語(yǔ)研究. 2016(01)
[7]《構(gòu)式化與構(gòu)式變化》介紹[J]. 陳滿(mǎn)華. 外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究. 2016(01)
[8]從構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法看語(yǔ)言演變——《構(gòu)式化與構(gòu)式變異》評(píng)介[J]. 周洋. 外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2016(01)
[9]《構(gòu)式化與構(gòu)式演變》評(píng)介[J]. 李健雪,王焱. 現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ). 2015(02)
[10]以構(gòu)式功能為基礎(chǔ)的英漢乏詞義結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)比研究[J]. 仇偉. 外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2015(02)
博士論文
[1]英語(yǔ)虛化動(dòng)詞結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D]. 張愛(ài)樸.上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué) 2012
[2]英語(yǔ)乏詞義結(jié)構(gòu)的認(rèn)知研究[D]. 仇偉.河南大學(xué) 2011
碩士論文
[1]英語(yǔ)輕動(dòng)詞的優(yōu)化釋義模型[D]. 王燕.廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2017
[2]基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的英語(yǔ)輕動(dòng)詞結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D]. 劉雯芳.中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué) 2015
[3]英語(yǔ)VL-a-VN構(gòu)式和漢語(yǔ)V-yi（一）-V構(gòu)式對(duì)比分析[D]. 全金鑫.延邊大學(xué) 2015
[4]構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法視角下的英語(yǔ)輕動(dòng)詞構(gòu)式研究[D]. 萬(wàn)陽(yáng).西南大學(xué) 2014
[5]動(dòng)力意象圖式下的輕動(dòng)詞語(yǔ)義研究[D]. 李嬌枝.南京師范大學(xué) 2013
[6]英語(yǔ)虛義動(dòng)詞結(jié)構(gòu)的語(yǔ)義和句法研究[D]. 廉美娜.延邊大學(xué) 2011
本文編號(hào)：3442980
【文章來(lái)源】：廣州大學(xué)廣東省
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：137 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background Introduction to Composite Predicates
1.2 Issues of This Thesis
1.3 Purposes and Significances of This Thesis
1.3.1 Purposes of This Thesis
1.3.2 Significances of This Thesis
1.4 Organization of The Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Study of Composite Predicates Abroad
2.2 Domestic Study of Composite Predicates
2.3 Comments on Previous Studies of Composite Predicates
2.3.1 The Advantages of Previous Studies
2.3.2 The Features of Previous Studies
2.3.3 The Disadvantages of Previous Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 A Brief Introduction to the History and Development of Metonymy
3.1.1 Various Definitions of Conceptual Metonymy
3.1.1.1 Rhetorical View on Metonymy
3.1.1.2 Cognitive View on Metonymy
3.2 Classifications of Metonymy
3.3 Grammatical Metonymy and Its Features
3.3.1 Grammatical Metonymy
3.3.2 Features of Grammatical Metonymy
3.4 Constructionalization Theory(CT)
3.4.1 A Brief Introduction to CT
3.4.2 The Main Idea of CT
3.4.3 The Features of CT
Chapter Four Methodology of This Thesis
4.1 An Introduction to British National Corpus(BNC)
4.2 Design of the Research
4.3 Methods of Measuring Schematicity,Productivity and Compositionality
4.3.1 Method of Measuring the Schematicity
4.3.2 Method of Measuring the Productivity
4.3.3 Method of Measuring the Compositionality
4.4 The Criteria of Classification of N_(DEV) in Composite Predicates
4.4.1 Classification of N_(DEV) Based on Original Verb Meanings
4.4.2 Classification of N_(DEV) Based on Behavior Features of Verbs
Chapter Five The Metonymic Feature,Construction Features,Syntactic-Semantic Features and the Constructionalization Characteristics of Composite Predicates
5.1 The Metonymic Operation Model of Composite Predicates
5.2 The Construction Features of Composite Predicate
5.2.1 The Definition of Construction
5.2.2 The Causes of Composite Predicates Being Viewed as Constructions
5.3 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) of Composite predicates
5.3.1 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Have+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.1.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Have+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.1.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Have+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.1.3 The Semantic Features of Have and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Have+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.2 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Take+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.2.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Take+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.2.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Take+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.2.3 The Semantic Features of Take and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Take+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.3 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Make+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.3.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Make+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.3.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Make+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.3.3 The Semantic Features of Make and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Make+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.4 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Give+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.4.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Give+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.4.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Give+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.4.3 The Semantic Features of Give and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Give+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.5 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Do+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.5.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Do+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.5.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Do+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.5.3 The Semantic Features of Do and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Do+A+N_(DEV)
5.4 Comparative Analysis of N_(DEV) amidst Different Composite Predicates
5.4.1 Similarities and Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.1.1 The Similarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.1.2 The Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.2 Similarities and Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.4.2.1 The Similarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.4.2.2 The Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.5 The Constructionalization Characteristics of Composite Predicates
5.5.1 The Schematicity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.1.1 Definitions of Schematicity
5.5.1.2 The Schematicity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.1.3 Different Degrees of Schematicity Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.2 The Productivity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.2.1 Definition and Criteria of Productivity
5.5.2.2 Different Degrees of Productivity Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.3 The Compositionality of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.3.1 Definition and Criteria of Compositionality
5.5.3.2 Different Degrees of Compositionality Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.6 Comparative Analysis of Schematicity,Productivity and Compositionality of the Five Composite Predicates
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings of This Thesis
6.2 Implications of This Thesis
6.3 Limitations of This Study and Suggestions for Further Research
6.3.1 Limitations of This Study
6.3.2 Suggestions for Further Research on Composite Predicates
References
碩士研究生在校期間科研成果清單
【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]《水滸傳》中108將綽號(hào)的轉(zhuǎn)喻研究[J]. 謝彥君. 佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2019(01)
[2]復(fù)雜轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象探析[J]. 席建國(guó). 佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2019(01)
[3]《構(gòu)式化與構(gòu)式演變》介紹[J]. Elizabeth C.Traugott,Graeme Trousdale,黃勁偉. 當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué). 2018(01)
[4]英語(yǔ)輕動(dòng)詞與動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)名詞搭配特征研究——基于“詞匯體”分布的實(shí)證研究[J]. 曾天嬌,賈冠杰. 外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2017(06)
[5]淺析英語(yǔ)中的輕動(dòng)詞結(jié)構(gòu)[J]. 戴婷婷. 廣東蠶業(yè). 2017(03)
[6]Have a NDev結(jié)構(gòu)之語(yǔ)法轉(zhuǎn)喻及構(gòu)式化特征考察[J]. 席建國(guó),王文斌. 外語(yǔ)研究. 2016(01)
[7]《構(gòu)式化與構(gòu)式變化》介紹[J]. 陳滿(mǎn)華. 外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究. 2016(01)
[8]從構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法看語(yǔ)言演變——《構(gòu)式化與構(gòu)式變異》評(píng)介[J]. 周洋. 外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2016(01)
[9]《構(gòu)式化與構(gòu)式演變》評(píng)介[J]. 李健雪,王焱. 現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ). 2015(02)
[10]以構(gòu)式功能為基礎(chǔ)的英漢乏詞義結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)比研究[J]. 仇偉. 外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2015(02)
博士論文
[1]英語(yǔ)虛化動(dòng)詞結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D]. 張愛(ài)樸.上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué) 2012
[2]英語(yǔ)乏詞義結(jié)構(gòu)的認(rèn)知研究[D]. 仇偉.河南大學(xué) 2011
碩士論文
[1]英語(yǔ)輕動(dòng)詞的優(yōu)化釋義模型[D]. 王燕.廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2017
[2]基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的英語(yǔ)輕動(dòng)詞結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D]. 劉雯芳.中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué) 2015
[3]英語(yǔ)VL-a-VN構(gòu)式和漢語(yǔ)V-yi（一）-V構(gòu)式對(duì)比分析[D]. 全金鑫.延邊大學(xué) 2015
[4]構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法視角下的英語(yǔ)輕動(dòng)詞構(gòu)式研究[D]. 萬(wàn)陽(yáng).西南大學(xué) 2014
[5]動(dòng)力意象圖式下的輕動(dòng)詞語(yǔ)義研究[D]. 李嬌枝.南京師范大學(xué) 2013
[6]英語(yǔ)虛義動(dòng)詞結(jié)構(gòu)的語(yǔ)義和句法研究[D]. 廉美娜.延邊大學(xué) 2011
本文編號(hào)：3442980
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/3442980.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
