本文選題：詞匯的廣度知識 + 詞匯的深度知識��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：詞匯知識是語言技能中的重要構(gòu)成內(nèi)容,是提高語言熟練水平的基礎(chǔ)。詞匯知識演變?yōu)閮蓚�(gè)維度,詞匯的廣度知識與詞匯的深度知識。研究者認(rèn)為詞匯知識和閱讀能力存在互為影響關(guān)系,不少學(xué)者對詞匯兩個(gè)維度知識與閱讀能力的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了研究,基本驗(yàn)證了詞匯知識與閱讀能力的互相促進(jìn)關(guān)系�，F(xiàn)有研究對外語學(xué)習(xí)和教學(xué)提供了很多啟示,但也存在許多問題。相關(guān)研究重視詞匯廣度知識,忽視詞匯深度知識。測量學(xué)習(xí)者詞匯深度知識的方法不一致,測量閱讀理解的方法也不一致,這在一定程度上會影響研究結(jié)果。鑒于前述問題分析,本研究嘗試通過閱讀概括的測量方式,旨在探索詞匯知識和閱讀理解的關(guān)系。閱讀概括既是英語專業(yè)學(xué)生要求具備的閱讀與研究技能,也是與前人研究不同的測量方法。論文采用實(shí)驗(yàn)途徑,研究選取某大學(xué)40名英語專業(yè)的學(xué)生作為受試。論文包含三個(gè)研究問題:(1)詞匯的廣度知識與閱讀概括能力有什么關(guān)系?(2)詞匯的深度知識與閱讀概括能力有什么關(guān)系?(3)在詞形變換、近義詞、一詞多義三個(gè)深度詞匯知識中,哪一種知識對閱讀概括的影響力較大?實(shí)驗(yàn)共包含三個(gè)測試和一個(gè)問卷,三個(gè)測試分別為詞匯廣度測試、詞匯深度測試、閱讀概括測試。實(shí)驗(yàn)以前人的測試為基礎(chǔ),但做了三處明顯的修改和調(diào)整,包括:詞匯廣度測試對產(chǎn)出性詞匯和接受性詞匯的共同測量;詞匯深度測試從近義詞、一詞多義和詞形轉(zhuǎn)換三個(gè)角度進(jìn)行測量;通過閱讀概括方式測量閱讀理解能力。受試對象按要求完成三個(gè)測試和問卷。本實(shí)驗(yàn)用SPSS軟件對實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,得到了以下的結(jié)果:(1)詞匯的廣度知識和閱讀概括能力存在顯著的正相關(guān);(2)詞匯的深度知識和閱讀概括能力也存在顯著的正相關(guān)但其相關(guān)系數(shù)比廣度與閱讀的相關(guān)系數(shù)小;(3)在詞形變換、近義詞、一詞多義這三個(gè)深度詞匯知識中,一詞多義知識對閱讀概括能力影響較大。本研究同時(shí)提出詞匯教學(xué)與閱讀提高的啟示與建議。
[Abstract]:Vocabulary knowledge is an important component of language skills and the basis for improving language proficiency. Lexical knowledge evolves into two dimensions: the breadth of vocabulary and the depth of vocabulary. Many scholars have studied the relationship between lexical knowledge and reading ability and verified the relationship between lexical knowledge and reading ability. The existing research has provided a lot of enlightenment for foreign language learning and teaching, but there are also many problems. The related studies attach importance to the knowledge of vocabulary breadth and neglect the knowledge of depth of vocabulary. The methods of measuring the depth of vocabulary knowledge of learners are inconsistent, and the methods of measuring reading comprehension are also inconsistent, which will affect the results of the study to some extent. In view of the above problem analysis, this study attempts to explore the relationship between lexical knowledge and reading comprehension through the measurement of reading generalization. Reading generalization is not only a reading and research skill required by English majors, but also a different measurement method from previous studies. In this paper, 40 English majors from a university are selected as subjects. The thesis contains three research questions: (1) what is the relationship between the breadth of vocabulary knowledge and the ability to generalize reading? (2) what is the relationship between the depth of vocabulary knowledge and the ability of reading generalization? (3) in the three depth lexical knowledge of lexical transformation, synonym, polysemy, etc. Which knowledge has a greater influence on reading generalization? The experiment consists of three tests and one questionnaire. The three tests are vocabulary span test, vocabulary depth test and reading generalization test. Prior to the experiment, the human test was based on three distinct modifications and adjustments, including the common measurement of productive and receptive vocabulary by the vocabulary breadth test, and the lexical depth test from synonyms. One word polysemy and lexical transformation are measured; reading comprehension is measured by reading generalization. The subjects completed three tests and questionnaires as required. In this experiment, the experimental data were statistically analyzed by SPSS software. The results are as follows: 1) there is a significant positive correlation between vocabulary breadth knowledge and reading generalization ability. (2) depth knowledge and reading generalization ability also have significant positive correlation, but the correlation coefficient ratio breadth is correlated with reading ability. The coefficient is less than 3) in the transformation of word form, Among the three deep lexical knowledge of synonyms and polysemy, polysemous knowledge has a great influence on the ability of reading generalization. At the same time, this study puts forward the enlightenment and suggestions on vocabulary teaching and reading improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H319.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白麗芳;戴春燕;;不同等級與層面的詞匯知識對閱讀和寫作水平的影響[J];外語教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2013年02期

2 劉曉樹;;詞匯知識習(xí)得影響英語寫作水平實(shí)證研究[J];雞西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

3 高亮;;詞匯知識與閱讀理解的相關(guān)性研究[J];安康學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

4 陳冬梅;;詞匯的深度和廣度與寫作的關(guān)系探究[J];貴州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

5 李曉;;詞匯量、詞匯深度知識與語言綜合能力關(guān)系研究[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2007年05期

6 龔兵;;詞匯知識深度對閱讀能力的影響[J];國外外語教學(xué);2006年02期

7 譚曉晨;;中國英語學(xué)習(xí)者產(chǎn)出性詞匯發(fā)展研究[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2006年03期

8 桂詩春;;英語詞匯學(xué)習(xí)面面觀——答客問[J];外語界;2006年01期

9 張學(xué)賓;邱天河;;詞匯知識和閱讀關(guān)系的實(shí)證性研究[J];外語教學(xué);2006年01期

10 胡文仲;論跨文化交際的實(shí)證研究[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2005年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 宋云燕;詞匯知識與閱讀理解關(guān)系研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2014年

2 劉暢;非英語專業(yè)學(xué)生英語詞匯知識的廣度和深度對閱讀理解的影響[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

3 仇雪燕;普通高中學(xué)生英語詞匯知識廣度和深度與閱讀理解關(guān)系的研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

4 周逢;詞匯知識的深度在閱讀理解中的作用[D];華東師范大學(xué);2009年

5 馬婷;詞匯廣度和深度對二語水平的預(yù)測力評估[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1963858