本文選題：江蘇卷高考英語 + 全國卷高考英語��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：高考作為我國第一大選拔性考試,其試題命制的科學(xué)性備受社會(huì)關(guān)注。江蘇省自2004年開始實(shí)施高考自主命題,而近年來全國不少省份已逐漸加入了全國卷的行列。新課改的深入讓英語一直走在高考改革的前沿,其試題質(zhì)量成為社會(huì)關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn),而效度是衡量一項(xiàng)測試質(zhì)量的重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。因此,本研究旨在通過分析比較江蘇卷與全國卷(I)高考英語試題的效度為江蘇卷的命題設(shè)計(jì)及高中英語教學(xué)方面提供建議。本文將選取2014-2016江蘇卷和全國卷高考英語試題相同題型部分(閱讀理解、完形和寫作試題),采取定性與定量相結(jié)合的方法進(jìn)行效度比較研究。首先,本文依據(jù)Bachman和Palmer的任務(wù)特征框架、2014-2016年江蘇卷和全國卷高考英語考試說明、《普通高中英語課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》對(duì)2014-2016年兩卷試題進(jìn)行表面效度和內(nèi)容效度比較研究。其次,依據(jù)Bachman的交際語言能力理論對(duì)兩卷試題進(jìn)行結(jié)構(gòu)效度比較研究。最后對(duì)南京市4名高三英語教師就高考試題的反撥作用及教學(xué)策略調(diào)整進(jìn)行了訪談。主要研究問題有:(1) 2014-2016年江蘇卷與全國卷(I)的表面效度如何?有何差異?(2)兩卷內(nèi)容效度如何?有何差異?(3)兩卷結(jié)構(gòu)效度如何?有何差異?(4)通過江蘇卷與全國卷(I)比較研究和訪談,探究高考試題有哪些反撥作用?會(huì)給高中英語教學(xué)策略帶來哪些調(diào)整?研究結(jié)果表明:(1)就題型設(shè)計(jì)而言,江蘇卷表面效度總體低于全國卷(I),兩卷閱讀理解及完形試題(客觀性試題)表面效度低于寫作試題(主觀性試題);(2)兩卷在內(nèi)容效度上各自呈現(xiàn)不同特點(diǎn),總體而言,內(nèi)容效度均較高;相比全國卷(I),江蘇卷閱讀理解試題篇章更長,對(duì)學(xué)生閱讀速度要求更高,易讀度更低,但在體裁、題材和測試技能的分布上更廣、更均衡;其完形填空試題篇章更長,對(duì)學(xué)生閱讀速度要求更高,詞類分布不均;其寫作試題對(duì)學(xué)生寫作速度要求更高,情景和信息提供方式更合適、更具多樣性;(3)兩卷試題均考查到學(xué)生語法、語篇、語用及策略能力,結(jié)構(gòu)效度較高,但江蘇卷對(duì)學(xué)生的交際語言能力要求高于全國卷(I) ; (4)江蘇高考試題的難度會(huì)增加師生學(xué)習(xí)負(fù)擔(dān),模擬試題越來越難,但部分試題可引導(dǎo)學(xué)生更好地學(xué)習(xí)并使用英語。此外,中學(xué)英語教學(xué)將更注重多種教學(xué)策略的綜合,關(guān)注語言在真實(shí)交際語境中的運(yùn)用。
[Abstract]:College entrance examination is the first selection examination in our country. Jiangsu Province has been implementing the independent proposition of college entrance examination since 2004, but in recent years, many provinces have gradually joined the ranks of the national volume. With the deepening of the new curriculum reform, English has been at the forefront of the college entrance examination reform, and the quality of the test questions has become the focus of attention of the society, and the validity is an important standard to measure the quality of a test. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the validity of the college entrance examination questions in Jiangsu volume with that in the whole country. The purpose of this study is to provide suggestions for the proposition design and English teaching in senior high schools. This paper will choose the same part of the English examination questions of the 2014-2016 Jiangsu volume and the national examination (reading comprehension, gestalt and writing), and adopt the qualitative and quantitative methods to compare the validity of the questions. First of all, according to the task characteristic framework of Bachman and Palmer, this paper makes a comparative study on the surface validity and content validity of the two volumes of English examination questions from 2014-2016 to 2014-2016. Secondly, according to Bachman's communicative competence theory, a comparative study of the structural validity of the two volumes of questions is carried out. Finally, four senior English teachers in Nanjing are interviewed about the backwash effect of college entrance examination questions and the adjustment of teaching strategies. The main research questions are: (1) what are the surface validity of Jiangsu Volume and National Volume I) 2014-2016? What's the difference? (2) what's the validity of the two volumes? What's the difference? What is the difference? (4) through the comparative study and interview between Jiangsu volume and national volume I, what backwash effect does the college entrance examination question have? What adjustments will be brought to English teaching strategies in senior high schools? The results show that in terms of question design, The surface validity of Jiangsu volume is generally lower than that of the whole country, and the surface validity of the two volumes of reading comprehension and gestalt (objective test) is lower than that of the writing test (subjective question / 2). The two volumes show different characteristics in content validity. Compared with the whole country, Jiangsu volume reading comprehension test has longer text, higher reading speed and lower readability, but it has a wider and more balanced distribution in genre, subject matter and test skills. The cloze test has longer text, higher reading speed and uneven distribution of parts of speech. In both volumes, the students' grammatical, textual, pragmatic and strategic abilities were found to be of high structural validity. However, Jiangsu volume requires higher communicative language competence than the whole country. (4) the difficulty of Jiangsu college entrance examination will increase the learning burden of teachers and students, and it is becoming more and more difficult to simulate the test, but some of the questions can guide the students to learn and use English better. In addition, middle school English teaching will pay more attention to the synthesis of various teaching strategies and the application of language in real communicative context.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G633.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陶百強(qiáng);劉清華;;高考英語試卷建構(gòu)性題型命題中的答案控制研究——以2015年全國高考英語卷為例[J];考試研究;2016年03期

2 劉穎;王文琴;許立新;;江蘇省高考英語閱讀理解測試內(nèi)容效度的歷時(shí)研究(2009～2015)[J];教育測量與評(píng)價(jià)(理論版);2016年02期

3 康薈杰;;2015年高考英語全國卷與各省市自主命題卷中完形填空的共時(shí)研究[J];英語教師;2015年23期

4 張春青;;高考英語語法填空題構(gòu)念效度的Rasch模型分析[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2015年02期

5 肖云南;林椿;;高考英語湖南卷(2010~2014)閱讀理解試題內(nèi)容效度研究[J];教育測量與評(píng)價(jià)(理論版);2015年03期

6 夏春芳;羅曉杰;;高考英語浙江卷(2010~2014)完型填空試題內(nèi)容效度分析[J];教育測量與評(píng)價(jià)(理論版);2015年03期

7 吳宗酉;;高考英語對(duì)高中英語課堂教學(xué)反撥作用的實(shí)證研究[J];教育與考試;2015年01期

8 董曼霞;;高考英語全國卷完形填空篇章特點(diǎn)與考點(diǎn)效度研究[J];教育測量與評(píng)價(jià)(理論版);2014年08期

9 寧潔;汪少華;;2012-2014年江蘇省高考英語閱讀理解內(nèi)容效度分析[J];考試研究;2014年04期

10 李鑫;修旭東;蘇風(fēng)燕;;高考英語閱讀測試和雅思閱讀測試題型的認(rèn)知效度對(duì)比研究[J];魯東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 董連忠;全國高考北京市英語考試對(duì)高中英語教學(xué)的反撥效應(yīng)研究[D];上海外國語大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 劉青;英語高考分省命題條件下寫作測試的現(xiàn)狀與趨勢[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2014年

2 張建珍;高考英語測試對(duì)高中英語學(xué)習(xí)者的反撥效應(yīng)調(diào)查[D];福建師范大學(xué);2013年

3 張璐;高考英語試卷的四個(gè)維度分析[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2012年

4 陳婧;高考英語卷閱讀理解試題特征與走向分析[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1781461