英語教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格與高中生批判性思維能力的關(guān)系研究
本文選題:英語教師 + 教學(xué)風(fēng)格。 參考:《山西師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:批判性思維近幾年已經(jīng)成為了評判中國教育體系和學(xué)生素質(zhì)的活靶子。中外媒體一直炒作“中國學(xué)生到底會(huì)不會(huì)批判性思維”,很多人開始質(zhì)疑中國的教育體制,認(rèn)為填鴨式的教育扼殺了學(xué)習(xí)的創(chuàng)造性。眾多觀點(diǎn)紛紛涌現(xiàn),然而很少有人研究英語教學(xué)風(fēng)格與學(xué)生的批判性思維兩者之間的關(guān)系,那么教學(xué)風(fēng)格對學(xué)習(xí)批判性思維到底影響有多大?基于此,很有必要加強(qiáng)學(xué)生批判性思維與教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格二者關(guān)系的研究。文本旨在探討英語教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格與高中生批判性思維傾向兩者之間的作用機(jī)制,了解英語教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格和高中生批判性思維的現(xiàn)狀和特點(diǎn),幫助高中英語教師快速形成有效的教學(xué)風(fēng)格,讓他們學(xué)生的批判性思維能力進(jìn)一步得到提高。本研究在山西省忻州市五臺中學(xué)進(jìn)行了問卷調(diào)查,采用了《批判性思維能力量表》和《教師風(fēng)格調(diào)查問卷》,以班為單位,對學(xué)生進(jìn)行隨機(jī)抽樣后共得到300份問卷。經(jīng)過整理,剔除無效問卷24份,最后篩選出276名被試,回收率是92%。運(yùn)用SPSS 20.0和Microsoft Excel軟件輸入數(shù)據(jù),進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,研究結(jié)果如下:(1)英語教師使用頻率最多的教學(xué)風(fēng)格是關(guān)愛他人型,其次也經(jīng)常在教學(xué)中使用邏輯型和幽默型,相對較少地使用創(chuàng)造型教學(xué)風(fēng)格;高中男生和女生對所期待的英語教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格在性別上差異不顯著;除創(chuàng)造型教學(xué)風(fēng)格外,英語教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格在年級上差異顯著,且高二年級的學(xué)生得分最高。(2)80%以上的高中生批判性思維傾向?yàn)樨?fù)性,且在各7個(gè)維度上,平均分都低于40分,都沒有達(dá)到相應(yīng)的批判性思維能力。此外,除在尋找真相、開放思維和認(rèn)知成熟度三個(gè)維度上,男女生的批判性思維能力存在顯著差異,但是在其他分量表和思維總分上性別差異不顯著。在批判性思維總分,尋找真相,開放思想,求知欲和認(rèn)知成熟度分量表上,高中生的批判性思維存在著顯著的年級差異。(3)除在分析分量表外,在英語教師創(chuàng)造型教學(xué)風(fēng)格下的高中生的批判性思維能力無論是在總分還是在其余分量表上都得分最高。在邏輯型教學(xué)風(fēng)格下的高中生的批判性思維能力在分析分量表得分最高。(4)訪談得知,不同類型的教學(xué)風(fēng)格對學(xué)生思維發(fā)展有不同的影響。邏輯型教學(xué)風(fēng)格促使學(xué)生的思維趨于嚴(yán)密,從而造成學(xué)生獨(dú)立思考、崇尚理性思維良好品格。創(chuàng)造型教學(xué)風(fēng)格對學(xué)生創(chuàng)造性思維的發(fā)展,起到了很好的示范、誘導(dǎo)、激發(fā)的作用。
[Abstract]:Critical thinking has become a living target for judging the quality of Chinese education system and students in recent years.Chinese and foreign media have been hyping "whether Chinese students can think critically", and many people begin to question China's educational system, saying that cramming education stifles the creativity of learning.However, few people have studied the relationship between English teaching style and students' critical thinking. How much influence does teaching style have on learning critical thinking?Based on this, it is necessary to strengthen the study of the relationship between students' critical thinking and teachers' teaching style.The purpose of this paper is to explore the mechanism between the teaching style of English teachers and the critical thinking tendency of senior high school students, and to understand the present situation and characteristics of the teaching style of English teachers and the critical thinking of senior high school students.Help high school English teachers to form effective teaching style quickly and improve their students' critical thinking ability.A questionnaire survey was conducted in Wutai Middle School of Xinzhou City, Shanxi Province. A total of 300 questionnaires were obtained by using the critical thinking ability scale and the teacher's style questionnaire.After sorting out 24 invalid questionnaires, 276 subjects were selected and the recovery rate was 922%.Using SPSS 20.0 and Microsoft Excel software to input data and make statistical analysis, the results are as follows: (1) the most frequently used teaching style of English teachers is caring for others, and logic and humor are often used in teaching.Creative teaching style is used less; there is no significant gender difference between male and female students in the expected teaching style of English teachers; in addition to creative teaching style, there are significant differences in English teachers' teaching styles in grade.And the students in grade two of senior high school had the highest scores. 80% or more of senior high school students had negative tendency of critical thinking, and the average score of each dimension was less than 40, all of them did not reach the corresponding critical thinking ability.In addition, except for the three dimensions of seeking truth, open thinking and cognitive maturity, there are significant differences in critical thinking ability of male and female students, but there is no significant gender difference in other component tables and total scores of thinking.On the total score of critical thinking, seeking truth, open thinking, desire for knowledge and cognitive maturity scale, there is a significant grade difference in critical thinking of high school students.The critical thinking ability of high school students under the creative teaching style of English teachers has the highest scores both in the total score and in the other component tables.The critical thinking ability of senior high school students under the logic teaching style has different influence on the development of students' thinking.The logical teaching style promotes the students' thinking to be strict, which makes students think independently and advocates the good character of rational thinking.Creative teaching style plays a good role in demonstrating, inducing and stimulating the development of students' creative thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:G633.41
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 谷振詣;;批判性思維教學(xué):理論與實(shí)踐[J];工業(yè)和信息化教育;2014年03期
2 賀雯;黎雯君;曹鈺舒;;教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格的轉(zhuǎn)變及其與學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)關(guān)系的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];現(xiàn)代中小學(xué)教育;2014年02期
3 李如密;黃慧麗;;教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格對學(xué)生的影響機(jī)制探析[J];上海教育科研;2013年05期
4 賈麗新;;教師的教學(xué)風(fēng)格和特點(diǎn)對學(xué)生的影響[J];吉林教育;2013年04期
5 張瓊;;教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格對小學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)習(xí)慣形成的影響[J];教育教學(xué)論壇;2011年29期
6 章雪穎;;陶行知:捧著一顆心來,不帶半根草去[J];中國教師;2011年11期
7 賀雯;張慶;黎雯君;;教師有效教學(xué)風(fēng)格的結(jié)構(gòu)與形容詞評定問卷編制[J];上海教育科研;2011年05期
8 彭美慈,汪國成,陳基樂,陳滿輝,白洪海,李守國,李繼平,蔡蕓芳,王君俏,殷磊;批判性思維能力測量表的信效度測試研究[J];中華護(hù)理雜志;2004年09期
9 鐘啟泉;“批判性思維”及其教學(xué)[J];全球教育展望;2002年01期
10 劉儒德;批判性思維及其教學(xué)[J];高等師范教育研究;1996年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 黃芳;大學(xué)生批判性思維能力培養(yǎng)方式實(shí)踐探索[D];上海外國語大學(xué);2013年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條
1 趙瑋曼;中學(xué)生數(shù)學(xué)課堂參與相關(guān)性研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年
2 梅韻;高中生批判性閱讀思維能力培養(yǎng)的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];山西師范大學(xué);2015年
3 肖艷君;本族語與非本族語英語教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格初探[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年
4 王瑞霞;英語專業(yè)學(xué)生批判性思維傾向與學(xué)習(xí)風(fēng)格間的相關(guān)性研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2012年
5 潘春培;英語專業(yè)學(xué)生批判性思維與寫作水平的相關(guān)性研究[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2012年
6 余悅;教師教學(xué)風(fēng)格對學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)成績的影響:學(xué)業(yè)自我效能感、學(xué)習(xí)興趣的中介作用[D];上海師范大學(xué);2012年
7 王艷;教師風(fēng)格形成探究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2005年
8 韓立敏;班主任之師生互動(dòng)風(fēng)格與小學(xué)生自我概念的關(guān)系研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2002年
,本文編號:1755559
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/1755559.html