本文關(guān)鍵詞：元認(rèn)知策略在高中英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)中的應(yīng)用研究　出處：《渤海大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 元認(rèn)知策略 英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué) 元認(rèn)知策略意識(shí) 英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作成績(jī)

【摘要】：在外語(yǔ)教學(xué)中，教師的任務(wù)是引導(dǎo)學(xué)生成為獨(dú)立自主、學(xué)習(xí)高效的外語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者，因而培養(yǎng)學(xué)生的自主學(xué)習(xí)能力顯得格外重要。這意味著學(xué)生需要掌握自主學(xué)習(xí)所必須的學(xué)習(xí)策略。在所有的學(xué)習(xí)策略中，元認(rèn)知策略占有重要的地位。而對(duì)高中學(xué)生來(lái)說(shuō)，在英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)過(guò)程中，寫(xiě)作是必須掌握的一項(xiàng)非常重要的語(yǔ)言技能。寫(xiě)作可以全面反映學(xué)生對(duì)英語(yǔ)的掌握程度。但不容樂(lè)觀的是，對(duì)于高中學(xué)生來(lái)說(shuō)，英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作一直是相對(duì)薄弱的環(huán)節(jié)。因此，如何提高學(xué)生的寫(xiě)作能力成了高中英語(yǔ)教學(xué)中關(guān)鍵的問(wèn)題之一。 元認(rèn)知這一術(shù)語(yǔ)在19世紀(jì)70年代由美國(guó)心理學(xué)家Flavell提出，從此元認(rèn)知理論受到了廣大研究者和學(xué)者的青睞。元認(rèn)知理論由兩部分組成，即元認(rèn)知知識(shí)和元認(rèn)知策略。后者是本研究的重點(diǎn)。在過(guò)去20多年間，國(guó)內(nèi)外研究者和學(xué)者對(duì)元認(rèn)知策略的研究日益增多，但與其他學(xué)習(xí)策略相比，此研究仍處于起步階段。因此，本文旨在研究元認(rèn)知策略培訓(xùn)對(duì)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)的影響，，探討元認(rèn)知策略應(yīng)用到高中英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)的可行性和有效性。 根據(jù)O’MalleyChamot (1990),元認(rèn)知策略包括計(jì)劃策略、監(jiān)控策略和評(píng)估策略。作者基于此分類(lèi)設(shè)計(jì)出一套把元認(rèn)知策略應(yīng)用到高中寫(xiě)作教學(xué)中的培訓(xùn)方案，并旨在回答如下兩個(gè)研究問(wèn)題：第一，元認(rèn)知策略寫(xiě)作教學(xué)能否提高學(xué)生的元認(rèn)知策略意識(shí)。第二，元認(rèn)知策略寫(xiě)作教學(xué)能否提高學(xué)生的寫(xiě)作成績(jī)。 實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)象是來(lái)自盤(pán)錦市高級(jí)中學(xué)的兩個(gè)平行班的高一學(xué)生。其中，實(shí)驗(yàn)班為47人，控制班為48人。實(shí)驗(yàn)歷時(shí)12周，實(shí)驗(yàn)班采用元認(rèn)知策略訓(xùn)練的寫(xiě)作教學(xué)模式，控制班采用傳統(tǒng)的寫(xiě)作教學(xué)模式。通過(guò)對(duì)有效數(shù)據(jù)的收集和分析，實(shí)驗(yàn)班訓(xùn)練前后的問(wèn)卷平均值分別為2.4897和3.5574。此結(jié)果表明：元認(rèn)知策略寫(xiě)作教學(xué)后實(shí)驗(yàn)班學(xué)生在計(jì)劃寫(xiě)作、監(jiān)控寫(xiě)作和評(píng)價(jià)寫(xiě)作方面的元認(rèn)知策略意識(shí)明顯增強(qiáng)。實(shí)驗(yàn)班的前后測(cè)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作平均成績(jī)分別是16.8298和18.5745。此結(jié)果表明：相比傳統(tǒng)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)而言，元認(rèn)知策略寫(xiě)作教學(xué)顯著地提高了學(xué)生的寫(xiě)作成績(jī)。而控制班的前后測(cè)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作平均成績(jī)分別是16.25和17.08。故不能否認(rèn)的是，經(jīng)過(guò)相同時(shí)長(zhǎng)的傳統(tǒng)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)，控制班的寫(xiě)作成績(jī)?cè)谝欢ǔ潭壬弦灿兴岣摺?本研究的實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果對(duì)當(dāng)前的寫(xiě)作教學(xué)，特別是高中英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)，具有一定的理論意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。同時(shí)指出了其研究局限性，并對(duì)進(jìn)一步的研究提出了建議。 最后期望本研究的成果能為高中英語(yǔ)教師提供一些英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)的可行性借鑒，從而有效地提高學(xué)生的寫(xiě)作成績(jī)。
[Abstract]:In foreign language teaching, the teacher's task is to guide students to become independent and efficient foreign language learners. Therefore, it is very important to cultivate students' autonomous learning ability, which means that students need to master the learning strategies necessary for autonomous learning. Metacognitive strategies play an important role in English learning for senior high school students. Writing is a very important language skill that must be mastered. Writing can fully reflect the students' mastery of English. However, it is not optimistic for senior high school students. English writing has always been a relatively weak link. Therefore, how to improve students' writing ability has become one of the key problems in high school English teaching. The term metacognition was proposed by American psychologist Flavell in 1870s. Since then, metacognitive theory has been favored by researchers and scholars. Metacognition theory consists of two parts. Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive strategies, the latter is the focus of this study. In the past 20 years, more and more researchers and scholars at home and abroad have studied metacognitive strategies, but compared with other learning strategies. This study is still in its infancy. Therefore, this paper aims to study the impact of metacognitive strategy training on English writing teaching, and to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of applying metacognitive strategies to English writing teaching in senior high schools. According to O'Malley Chamot 1990, metacognitive strategies include planning strategies. Based on this classification, the author designs a set of training programs to apply metacognitive strategies to high school writing teaching, and aims to answer the following two research questions: first. Whether metacognitive strategy writing teaching can improve students' metacognitive strategy consciousness. Second, whether metacognitive strategy writing teaching can improve students' writing achievement. The subjects were the first year students from two parallel classes in Panjin Senior Middle School. Among them, 47 were in the experimental class and 48 in the control class. The experiment lasted for 12 weeks. The experimental class adopts the writing teaching mode of metacognitive strategy training and the control class adopts the traditional writing teaching mode. The average of the questionnaire before and after training was 2.4897 and 3.5574 respectively. The results showed that the students in the experimental class were planning writing after the metacognitive strategy writing teaching. The awareness of metacognitive strategies in monitoring writing and evaluating writing was significantly enhanced. The average scores of pre-and post-test English writing in the experimental class were 16.8298 and 18.5745, respectively. The results showed that:. Compared with the traditional writing teaching. The teaching of metacognitive strategy writing has significantly improved the students' writing scores, while the average scores in the control class are 16.25 and 17.08, respectively. After the same time and long traditional writing teaching, the writing achievement of the control class has been improved to some extent. The experimental results of this study are of theoretical and practical significance to the current writing teaching, especially in senior high school English writing teaching. At the same time, the limitations of the research are pointed out. Suggestions for further study are put forward. Finally, it is hoped that the results of this study can provide some practical reference for senior English teachers in English writing teaching, so as to effectively improve students' writing performance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：渤海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G633.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅英芳;;元認(rèn)知策略培訓(xùn)與英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)的研究[J];才智;2011年02期

2 杜愛(ài)紅;元認(rèn)知策略與大學(xué)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

3 郭翔飛;;英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作自我教育能力與元認(rèn)知策略的培養(yǎng)[J];黑龍江高教研究;2010年07期

4 文秋芳，王海嘯;大學(xué)生英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)觀念與策略的分析[J];解放軍外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1996年04期

5 江慧;;英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作中元認(rèn)知策略使用水平調(diào)查與分析[J];呂梁教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

6 李炯英;中國(guó)學(xué)生二語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)策略的觀念與運(yùn)用——一項(xiàng)實(shí)證研究[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2002年01期

7 胡平;吳卞;;元認(rèn)知策略與大學(xué)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作的實(shí)證研究[J];重慶三峽學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

8 吳紅云,劉潤(rùn)清;二語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作元認(rèn)知理論構(gòu)成的因子分析[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;2004年03期

9 李森;改進(jìn)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)的重要舉措:過(guò)程教學(xué)法[J];外語(yǔ)界;2000年01期

10 紀(jì)康麗;外語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)中元認(rèn)知策略的培訓(xùn)[J];外語(yǔ)界;2002年03期

本文編號(hào)：1434863