“寫前討論”指教師在寫作前組織學(xué)生分成小組,引導(dǎo)學(xué)生對(duì)于某一作文主題進(jìn)行討論,為學(xué)生增加理解的機(jī)會(huì)并迅速地在規(guī)定的時(shí)間內(nèi)完成寫作。然而,關(guān)于它的研究集中在對(duì)寫作質(zhì)量的影響,且大多定位在大學(xué)生和英語專業(yè)等高級(jí)英語學(xué)習(xí)者。特別是對(duì)寫作流利度的影響更是無人探索。因此為了彌補(bǔ)這一缺口,本研究的重點(diǎn)在于考察“預(yù)寫討論”在高中階段對(duì)寫作流利度影響。本研究采用實(shí)驗(yàn)的方式來研究“寫前討論”對(duì)流利度的影響。本研究的被試對(duì)象為89名來自湖南某普通高一兩個(gè)班的學(xué)生,他們隨機(jī)分成實(shí)驗(yàn)班和控制班。寫作教學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)前,學(xué)生被要求寫一篇文章。試驗(yàn)期間,學(xué)生每?jī)芍苓M(jìn)行一次寫作訓(xùn)練,其中實(shí)驗(yàn)班采取“寫前討論”教學(xué)模式,而控制班則采用傳統(tǒng)寫作教學(xué)模式。實(shí)驗(yàn)后,兩個(gè)班的學(xué)生再次要求寫一篇文章作為后測(cè)。為了進(jìn)一步檢測(cè)他們對(duì)“預(yù)寫討論”是否提高流利度的看法,本研究還采用了預(yù)寫討論問卷(Cronbach’s a=0.673)。此外,為了彌補(bǔ)問卷調(diào)查的不足,增加本次研究的信度,本研究還提供了4名來自不同自寫作水平的學(xué)生的訪談,以期待活動(dòng)更好效果。本研究主義有以下發(fā)現(xiàn):第一,實(shí)驗(yàn)班和控制班經(jīng)過兩個(gè)月的訓(xùn)練后,在作文流利度方面存在顯著差異...

【文章頁數(shù)】：73 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Abbreviations
Chapter1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 The structure of the thesis
Chapter2 Literature Review
    2.1 Overview of Prewriting Discussion
        2.1.1 Definition of Prewriting Discussion
        2.1.2 Theoretical Foundation for Prewriting Discussion
        2.1.3 Previous Studies of Prewriting Discussion
    2.2 Overview of Writing Fluency
        2.2.1 Definition of Writing Fluency
        2.2.2 The Measurement Indexes of Writing Fluency
        2.2.3 Previous Studies of Writing Fluency Abroad
        2.2.4 Previous Studies of Prewriting Discussion at Home
    2.3 Summary
Chapter3 Research Methodology
    3.1 Research Questions
    3.2 Research Subjects
    3.3 Instruments
        3.3.1 English Writing Test
        3.3.2 Questionnaire
        3.3.3 Follow-up Interview
    3.4 Research Procedures
        3.4.1 Pre-experiment
        3.4.2 During-experiment
        3.4.3 Topics and Genre of Compositions
        3.4.4 The teaching method in the experiment class
        3.4.5 The teaching method in the control class
        3.4.6 Post-experiment
    3.5 Data Collection and Data Analysis
        3.5.1 Data Collection
        3.5.2 The Measurement of Writing Fluency
        3.5.3 Data Analysis
Character4 Results and Discussion
    4.1 Results of the Two Classes’Writing fluency
        4.1.1 Results of Two Classes’Writing Fluency in Pre-test
        4.1.2 Results of Two Classes’Writing Fluency in Post-test
    4.2.Results of Higher-level and Lower-level Writers’Writing Fluency
        4.2.1 Results of Higher-level and Lower-level Writers’Writing Fluency in Pretest
        4.2.2 Results of Higher-level and Lower-level Writers’Writing Fluency in Post-test
    4.3.Results of Questionnaire in Post-test
    4.4 Feedback from the Follow-up Interview
    4.5 Discussion of the Results
        4.5.1 Discussion of the First question
        4.5.2 Discussion of the Second Question
        4.5.3 Discussion of Questionnaire and Interview
Chapter5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings of the Study
    5.2 Pedagogic Implications
    5.3 Limitations
    5.4 Suggestions for the Further Research
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
Appendix Ⅲ
Appendix Ⅳ
Acknowledgements
在讀期間公開發(fā)表論文(著作)及科研情況



本文編號(hào)：3921770