發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-07 20:01

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：重慶市中考英語(yǔ)完形填空題效度研究（2011-2016）　出處：《重慶三峽學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 重慶市中考 英語(yǔ)完形填空 學(xué)生 教師 效度

【摘要】：一份試題有效與否意味著這個(gè)考試是否考出了它想考的能力。如果考試對(duì)它所想測(cè)的東西無(wú)效,那么考試的分?jǐn)?shù)對(duì)它的原始目的來(lái)說毫無(wú)意義。進(jìn)行效度研究可以證明一個(gè)考試有效與否。本研究通過選取重慶市萬(wàn)州中學(xué)初中三年級(jí)學(xué)生140名和27名英語(yǔ)教師作為樣本,對(duì)重慶市中考英語(yǔ)完形填空題效度進(jìn)行測(cè)試及問卷調(diào)查,分析近6年重慶市中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題的考點(diǎn)效度、內(nèi)容效度、結(jié)構(gòu)效度、表面效度,以嘗試分析解決以下問題:(1)2011-2016年重慶市中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題的考點(diǎn)效度如何?(2)2011-2016年重慶市中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題的內(nèi)容效度如何?(3)2011-2016年重慶市中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題的結(jié)構(gòu)效度如何?(4)2011-2016年重慶市中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題的表面效度如何?研究表明:(1)關(guān)于考點(diǎn)效度:2011-2016年考查句子與語(yǔ)篇的試題占較大的比重,均避免了單單看單詞就能鎖定正確答案的試題。其中,在2015年,句子與語(yǔ)篇的考查占了 100%,對(duì)學(xué)生的句子、語(yǔ)篇能力作了考查。就語(yǔ)篇這一最高層次來(lái)說,除2013年外,其余各試卷均占有相當(dāng)重的比例,分別為30%、50%、20%、30%、40%、40%,這說明命題人為突破句子層次作出了相應(yīng)的努力。除2013年外,其余5年試題的焦點(diǎn)因素均避免考查語(yǔ)法。2011-2016年試題均側(cè)重對(duì)意義的考查。(2)關(guān)于內(nèi)容效度:縱觀2011-2016年文章的體裁,多為應(yīng)用文和記敘文,可適當(dāng)增加別的體裁。題材均與學(xué)生日常生活息息相關(guān)。特別是2016年的文章,通過種花來(lái)引導(dǎo)人們擁有熱愛生活、發(fā)現(xiàn)幸福的人生觀,選文具有一定的人文性。2011-2016年完形填空所選材料文本易讀度指數(shù)分別屬于"很容易、容易、很容易、較容易、較容易、很容易"�；痉稀稑�(biāo)準(zhǔn)》及考試大綱要求,但2011-2016年所選材料的易讀度指數(shù)略有起伏,這一點(diǎn)可以更好地改善。(3)關(guān)于結(jié)構(gòu)效度:學(xué)生在做完形填空題過程中,運(yùn)用與文章相關(guān)的背景知識(shí)進(jìn)行猜測(cè)與學(xué)生測(cè)試得分均有很強(qiáng)的正相關(guān)(p0.01);得分7-8的會(huì)從理解每段話的意思入手;對(duì)策略11的使用,得分9-10的顯著高于6分及以下的學(xué)生。得分9-10分的運(yùn)用4項(xiàng)策略(分析句與句之間的關(guān)系、讀完一整段再找答案、運(yùn)用排除法找出答案和文章太難就靠猜測(cè))要少于7-8分的學(xué)生。其余10項(xiàng)策略表現(xiàn)出來(lái)的總體規(guī)律是,得分越高對(duì)策略的使用越多,結(jié)構(gòu)效度有效。(4)關(guān)于表面效度:學(xué)生對(duì)中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題的總體印象、形式、內(nèi)容和體裁、考察內(nèi)容及試題是否需要改進(jìn)五類效度的觀點(diǎn)基本一致,對(duì)中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題效度保持同意和基本同意觀點(diǎn)。教師對(duì)中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題的總體印象、形式、內(nèi)容和體裁、考察內(nèi)容及試題是否需要改進(jìn)五類效度的觀點(diǎn)基本一致,對(duì)中考英語(yǔ)完形填空試題效度保持基本同意和部分同意的觀點(diǎn),無(wú)極力反對(duì)和不同意觀點(diǎn)的存在,表明效度較高。為了保證試題的效度,本研究有以下幾方面建議:(一)對(duì)試題編制者來(lái)說,選材的體裁應(yīng)更為豐富;在設(shè)置試題與選項(xiàng)時(shí)要慎重,盡量避免學(xué)生使用猜測(cè)策略。(二)對(duì)教師來(lái)說,應(yīng)盡量為學(xué)生提供廣泛閱讀的機(jī)會(huì),不僅注重語(yǔ)言能力的培養(yǎng),也要注重人文素質(zhì)的培養(yǎng)。
[Abstract]:A test validity means that the test is taken out of it. If you want to test for it wants to test what is invalid, then the scores of the test of its original purpose is meaningless. The validity study can prove a test is valid or not. This paper selects Chongqing City Middle School of Wanzhou the third grade of junior middle school 140 students and 27 teachers as samples, test and questionnaire survey to the Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination cloze validity analysis in recent 6 years in Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination English Cloze Test Validity, content validity, structure validity, face validity, analysis to try to solve the following problems: (1) how to 2011-2016 years of Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination English Cloze Test validity? (2) to 2011-2016 years in Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination cloze test content validity? (3) 2011-2016 years in the city of Chongqing to test English Cloze How to construct validity to fill in the blank questions? (4) how to face validity 2011-2016 Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination cloze test? Research shows that: (1): 2011-2016 test on test validity of sentences and discourse papers accounted for a larger proportion of avoiding words alone can lock the correct answer to the questions. Among them, in 2015, the sentence and discourse examination accounted for 100% of students, sentence, discourse competence were examined. The discourse is the highest level, except for 2013, the rest of the paper was to occupy very heavy proportion, respectively 30%, 50%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 40%, this shows that the proposition of human breakthrough made corresponding to the sentence level. Except for 2013, the remaining 5 years test focus factors are to avoid the exemption.2011-2016 check the grammar questions focused on the significance of the study. (2) on content validity: the 2011-2016 genre throughout the year, as the application and Ji Xuwen That may be appropriate to increase the other genre. Themes and are closely related to students' daily life. Especially in 2016, to guide people through the flowers have found the love of life, happiness life, selection has certain humanities.2011-2016 cloze materials selected text easy to read index belong to "easy, easy, easy that is easy, easy, easy." < standard > and accord with the syllabus requirements, but 2011-2016 selected material readability index slightly downs, this point can be improved. (3) on the structure validity: students doing cloze test in the process of using, and articles related to background knowledge and students' test scores were guessing is a strong positive correlation (P0.01); 7-8 score will start from the understanding of each sentence meaning; on the 11 strategies used, 9-10 score was significantly higher than that of 6 points and score of 9-10 students. Use of the 4 strategies (the analysis of relationship between sentences and sentences read a paragraph to find the answer, by the method of exclusion, and find out the answer and the article too difficult to guess) less than 7-8 students. General rule of the remaining 10 strategies show that the higher the score strategy use more construct validity. (4) on the surface of validity: students of senior high school entrance examination of English Cloze Test in the overall impression, form, content and style, whether the investigation contents and questions need to be improved five kinds of validity are basically the same point of view, the senior high school entrance examination cloze test validity to maintain agreed and agreed with the teachers of basic English Cloze Tests in senior high school entrance examination. Test the overall impression, form, content and style, whether the investigation contents and questions need to be improved five kinds of validity are basically the same point of view, basically agree on English Cloze Test in senior high school entrance examination validity and part of the agreed point of view, no Do not agree and strongly opposed to the existence of high validity. In order to ensure that the validity of a test, this study has the following suggestions: (a) the test preparation for the selection of the genre should be more rich; we must be cautious in setting questions and options, try to avoid the use of students (two) of the guessing game. The teacher, should try to provide students with extensive reading opportunities, not only pay attention to the cultivation of language ability, also want to pay attention to the cultivation of humanistic quality.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶三峽學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G633.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁慧;;大學(xué)英語(yǔ)四級(jí)考試集庫(kù)式完形填空的內(nèi)容效度研究[J];宿州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

2 陳雯;;2009—2013年安徽省高考英語(yǔ)完形填空效度分析[J];考試周刊;2013年A2期

3 張青云;;北京市高考英語(yǔ)完形填空效度分析[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)刊(外語(yǔ)教育教學(xué));2013年02期

4 奚翠華;;英語(yǔ)測(cè)試中影響完形填空難度因素的實(shí)證研究[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2011年04期

5 單鳳平;;如何解好英語(yǔ)高考中的完形填空題[J];宿州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

6 王霞;游洪南;;論英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)言測(cè)試中M-C題型的信度與效度[J];科技信息;2009年31期

7 毛延生;張建麗;;國(guó)內(nèi)完形填空研究20年述評(píng)[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年02期

8 柳亞杰;;定距刪詞完形填空再研究[J];浙江樹人大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

9 張玲,韓慧;傳統(tǒng)完形填空與C-試題的效度對(duì)比研究[J];新疆教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

10 范麗霞;對(duì)合理刪詞和多項(xiàng)選擇完形填空表面效度的比較[J];滁州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1394009