本文關(guān)鍵詞：中日兩國大學(xué)生家庭功能、社會支持與特質(zhì)焦慮的關(guān)系研究　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 特質(zhì)焦慮 家庭系統(tǒng)論 家庭功能 社會支持 跨文化比較

【摘要】：大學(xué)生有焦慮情緒是一個比較普遍的現(xiàn)象,而特質(zhì)焦慮是產(chǎn)生焦慮情緒的重要人格特點之一。當(dāng)前對于探索影響特質(zhì)焦慮的家庭社會因素研究存在一些局限,而文化對其所產(chǎn)生的作用則更少被討論到。大學(xué)生作為未來社會的中流砥柱,關(guān)注他們的心理健康問題牽涉到中日兩國未來在經(jīng)濟民生政治等各領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展,對比兩國大學(xué)生特質(zhì)焦慮的社會家庭影響因素進行對比也能在一定程度上促進兩國今后在各個領(lǐng)域的理解與合作。所以本研究基于家庭系統(tǒng)理論以及McMaster家庭功能模型,通過跨文化比較的視角,旨在探索中日不同文化下社會和家庭因素對于特質(zhì)焦慮的影響。本研究將分三步進行,首先分別在中國群體與日本群體中,探索家庭功能、社會支持與特質(zhì)焦慮之間的三者關(guān)系,其次將中日兩國群體進行對比,驗證國籍差異對影響特質(zhì)焦慮的社會家庭因素產(chǎn)生的變化,最后從質(zhì)性研究的視角探索特質(zhì)焦慮源頭上的文化差異對兩個國家特質(zhì)焦慮差異的可能影響。本研究采用了問卷調(diào)查和開放題結(jié)合的研究方法。問卷部分依次使用了特質(zhì)焦慮量表、McMaster家庭功能評價模式中的自評量表以及領(lǐng)悟社會支持量表的中日修訂版本,對356名中國大學(xué)生以及279名日本大學(xué)生進行了調(diào)查研究。通過對數(shù)據(jù)的分析得出以下結(jié)果:(1)無論在哪種文化下,家庭功能和社會支持都與特質(zhì)焦慮有相關(guān);(2)中國文化下家庭功能與社會支持分別預(yù)測特質(zhì)焦慮,而日本文化下家庭功能對于特質(zhì)焦慮的作用被社會支持完全中介;(3)相比于日本大學(xué)生,改善中國大學(xué)生的社會支持有助于改善特質(zhì)焦慮;(4)相比于中國大學(xué)生,改善日本大學(xué)生的家庭功能有助于改善特質(zhì)焦慮;此外通過開放題對焦慮源頭的質(zhì)性分析則可以發(fā)現(xiàn):(5)中日大學(xué)生之間由于文化背景的不同而存在差異,這可能是造成社會家庭因素對于特質(zhì)焦慮影響有差異的原因之一。本研究揭示了社會家庭因素與特質(zhì)焦慮的關(guān)系,為系統(tǒng)論的家庭治療提供了一定的理論基礎(chǔ)。同時也發(fā)現(xiàn)了不同文化下這種關(guān)系存在部分的差異,為今后從事跨文化心理咨詢的從業(yè)者提供一定的借鑒價值。
[Abstract]:Anxiety is a common phenomenon in college students, and trait anxiety is one of the most important personality characteristics of anxiety. There are some limitations in the study of family and social factors that affect trait anxiety. College students, as the mainstay of the future society, pay close attention to their mental health problems, which involve the future development of China and Japan in the fields of economy, people's livelihood, politics and so on. Comparing the social and family factors of college students' trait anxiety between the two countries can also promote the understanding and cooperation between the two countries in various fields to a certain extent. Therefore, this study is based on the family system theory and McMas. Ter family function model. From the perspective of cross-cultural comparison, this study aims to explore the influence of social and family factors on trait anxiety in different cultures of China and Japan. Explore the relationship among family function, social support and trait anxiety. Secondly, compare Chinese and Japanese groups to verify the changes of nationality differences on the social and family factors that affect trait anxiety. Finally, from the perspective of qualitative research, we explore the possible influence of cultural differences in the source of trait anxiety on the differences in trait anxiety between the two countries. This study adopts the method of combining questionnaires with open questions. Using the trait anxiety scale. The self-rating scale in McMaster family function evaluation model and the revised version of perceived social support scale in China and Japan. A total of 356 Chinese college students and 279 Japanese college students were investigated. By analyzing the data, the following results were obtained: 1) under any culture. Family function and social support are related to trait anxiety. (2) in Chinese culture, family function and social support predict trait anxiety, while in Japanese culture, the role of family function in trait anxiety is completely mediated by social support; Compared with Japanese college students, improving the social support of Chinese college students helps to improve trait anxiety; Compared with Chinese college students, improving the family function of Japanese college students helps to improve trait anxiety; In addition, through the qualitative analysis of the source of anxiety, we can find that there are differences between Chinese and Japanese college students due to their different cultural backgrounds. This may be one of the reasons why social and family factors have different effects on trait anxiety. This study reveals the relationship between social family factors and trait anxiety. It provides a theoretical basis for family therapy in system theory, and also finds some differences in this relationship under different cultures, which provides some reference value for practitioners engaged in cross-cultural psychological counseling in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B844.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李平;陳益彤;賈衛(wèi)城;魏W，

本文編號：1385000