本文將比較分析1980年《聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》(CISG)和《緬甸銷售法》(SGA)中違約責(zé)任救濟規(guī)則的異同�？v觀人類歷史,商品的買賣自古以來就是商業(yè)活動的一個重要部分。商品交易涉及到貨物和服務(wù)在國家間的流通。隨著市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展,工業(yè)制成品市場的增長和發(fā)展中國家原材料新市場的開放,海外貿(mào)易得以擴張。一種簡單有效的溝通方式使商人能夠更可靠地遠距離購買和銷售商品,而現(xiàn)代技術(shù)使商品能在更短的時間內(nèi)運往世界各地。國際銷售合同和其他合同一樣,適用與之相關(guān)的國內(nèi)法律。商品交易以買賣雙方訂立的合同為基礎(chǔ),雙方都享有訂立商品買賣合同的權(quán)利。合同一旦成立,雙方當(dāng)事人就應(yīng)當(dāng)按照合同的約定履行義務(wù)。但是,合同雙方有時會發(fā)生違反合同義務(wù)的情況。因此,法律對違約的情況規(guī)定了幾種救濟措施,以避免或減少此類行為,并賠償受害者的損失。就合同而言,違反合同義務(wù)可以分為不同情況,并可根據(jù)不同的法律得到不同的救濟。此外,救濟規(guī)則作為國際貿(mào)易中提出索賠的主要依據(jù),成為國際貿(mào)易的基礎(chǔ)。當(dāng)一方當(dāng)事人違反或者不履行合同時,受害方有權(quán)請求損害賠償。因此,對違反合同義務(wù)的救濟無論對于國內(nèi)商品交易或者國際貿(mào)易都是十分重要的。本文...

【文章頁數(shù)】：174 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Abbreviations
Chapter1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the dissertation
    1.2 Purpose of the dissertation
    1.3 An overview of the parties’obligations and remedies under the two regimes
        1.3.1 Parties’obligations under the two regimes
        1.3.2 Parties’remedies under the two regimes
    1.4 Current research situation
    1.5 Structure of the dissertation
    1.6 Research questions and methodologies of the dissertation
    1.7 Statement of innovation
Chapter2 Compositions of breach based on the grounds for termination under the two regimes
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Categorization of breach ground for avoidance under the two regimes
    2.3 Similarities and differences of the compositions of the breach of contract under the two regimes
        2.3.1 Similarities of the components of breach
        2.3.2 Differences of the components of the breach
    2.4 Examination of the fundamental breach in other situations under the two regimes
        2.4.1 Non-performance of the Contract
        2.4.2 Delayed performance of the contract
        2.4.3 Defective performance of the contract
    2.5 Conclusion
Chapter3 Operation of the rights of avoidance of contract under the two regimes
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Problem concerning with termination
    3.3 Parties’right to declare the contract avoided under the two regimes
        3.3.1 Parties’right to declare the contract avoided under the CISG
        3.3.2 Parties’right to declare the contract terminated under the SGA
    3.4 Declaration of avoidance
    3.5 Effects of avoidance
    3.6 Similarities and differences of the avoidance rules under the two regimes
        3.6.1 Similarities of the avoidance rules under the two regimes
        3.6.2 Differences of the avoidance rules under the three regimes
    3.7 Conclusion
Chapter4 Damages rules for breach of contract under the two regimes
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Principles of governing measure of damages under the two regimes
        4.2.1 Application of the SGA and the Contract Act of Myanmar
        4.2.2 Application of the CISG
    4.3 Parties’right to claim damages under the two regimes
        4.3.1 Parties’right to claim damages under the CISG
        4.3.2 Parties’right to claim damages under the SGA
    4.4 Damages for breach of warranty
    4.5 Damages on repudiation of the contract before the due date or anticipatory breach
        4.5.1 Under the Myanmar Law
        4.5.2 Under the CISG
    4.6 Interest
    4.7 Mitigation of damages
    4.8 Similarities and differences of the damages rules under the two regimes
    4.9 Conclusion
Chapter5 Decree for specific performance for breach of contract under the two regimes
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 The right to require specific performance under the two regimes
        5.2.1 The right to require specific performance under the CISG
        5.2.2 Specific performance under Myanmar Law
    5.3 Similarities and differences of the specific performance rules under the two regimes
        5.3.1 Similarities rules under the two regimes
        5.3.2 Differences rules under the two regimes
    5.4 Conclusion
Chapter6 Examining the current legal issues relating to contracts and recommendations with the prospect to be in compliance with the International Sale of Goods
    6.1 Legal system and commercial contract law in Myanmar
    6.2 Current legal issues relating to contracts in Myanmar
    6.3 Reasons to amend the current sale law of Myanmar
    6.4 Time to amend the current sale law of Myanmar
    6.5 Recommendations to consider the CISG’s rules to be compliance with international sale transactions
    6.6 Summary
Bibliography
Table of cases
Academic Published Article
Acknowledgement



本文編號：3894323