天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

大學(xué)英語四級寫作測試分項評分量表的制定及其效度研究

發(fā)布時間:2024-11-20 21:33
  近年來,考試用戶越來越關(guān)注考試分數(shù)的解釋和意義,因此如何提供更加合理、清楚的分數(shù)解釋,以便促進合理的使用分數(shù)就成為語言測試開發(fā)者面臨的重要問題(Chapelle,Enright&Jamieson,2008)。在這種背景下,大規(guī)模外語考試中寫作測試的效度越來越引起研究者的關(guān)注,因為寫作測試所測量的語言能力往往不太明晰,極大地影響了考試用戶對寫作測試分數(shù)的理解。鑒于此,寫作測試中使用的評分量表成為語言測試領(lǐng)域的研究熱點。研究者們一致認為,評分量表體現(xiàn)了寫作測試實際測量的語言能力(McNamara,1996;McNamara,2002;Turner,2000;Weigle,2002)。然而,現(xiàn)有的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),大規(guī)?荚噷懽鳒y試中使用的評分量表通常都存在一些問題(Brindley,1998;Knoch,2009;Todd,Thienpermpool&Keyuravong,2004;Upshur&Turner,1995)。目前,專門聚焦大規(guī)模考試中使用的寫作評分量表的實證研究并不多見?紤]到寫作測試在國內(nèi)外大規(guī)模外語考試(如TOEFL、IELTS、CET、TEM)中的廣泛應(yīng)用...

【文章頁數(shù)】:229 頁

【學(xué)位級別】:博士

【文章目錄】:
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviations
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Context of the Study
    1.2 Research Background
        1.2.1 CET and CET Writing
        1.2.2 The scoring of the CET writing
        1.2.3 Concerns over the scoring of the CET writing
    1.3 Aim and Significance of This Study
    1.4 Research Questions
    1.5 Definition of Key Concepts
        1.5.1 Rating scale
        1.5.2 Rating criteria and rating category
        1.5.3 Writing proficiency
    1.6 Organization of the Dissertation
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW:RATING SCALES AS A RESEARCHDOMAIN
    2.1 The Role of Rating Scales in Writing Assessment
        2.1.1 Validity of writing assessment
        2.1.2 The role of rating scales
    2.2 Fundamental Considerations in Designing a Rating Scale
        2.2.1 Intended use of rating scales
        2.2.2 Types of rating scale
            2.2.2.1 Holistic scale
            2.2.2.2 Analytic scale
            2.2.2.3 Holistic scale or analytic scale:theoretical arguments
        2.2.3 Basis of rating scales
            2.2.3.1 Behaviorally based rating scale
            2.2.3.2 Theoretically-based rating scale
        2.2.4 Approaches to rating scale design
            2.2.4.1 Intuitive approach
            2.2.4.2 Empirical approach
        2.2.5 Number of scale levels and formulation of level descriptors
        2.2.6 Validation of rating scales
    2.3 Summary
CHAPTER 3 CONCEPTUALISING AND MEASURING THE EFL WRITINGCONSTRUCT WITH RATING SCALES:TOWARD A TENTATIVEDESCRIPTIVE FRAMEWORK
    3.1 Theoretical Construct of the EFL Writing Assessment
        3.1.1 Theories of communicative competence
            3.1.1.1 Communicative competence
            3.1.1.2 Communicative Language Ability
        3.1.2 Theories of EFL writing competence
            3.1.2.1 The model of text construction
            3.1.2.2 Taxonomy of language knowledge in writing
        3.1.3 Content knowledge in EFL writing assessments
        3.1.4 The construct of the CET4 writing
    3.2 Rating Criteria determined through Empirical Studies
    3.3 Rating Criteria Adopted in EFL Writing Assessments
        3.3.1 EFL writing assessments and their scoring methods
        3.3.2 A summary of the rating criteria adopted in EFL writing assessments
    3.4 A Tentative Conceptualized Framework for the CET4 Writing
        3.4.1 Relationships between theoretical components and rating criteria
        3.4.2 Definitions of the rating criteria
            3.4.2.1 Rating criteria measuring linguistic knowledge
            3.4.2.2 Rating criteria measuring discourse knowledge
            3.4.2.3 Rating criteria measuring sociolinguistic knowledge
            3.4.2.4 Rating criterion measuring content knowledge
            3.4.2.5 Other rating criteria
    3.5 Summary
CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND RESEARCH DESIGN
    4.1 Research Methodology
    4.2 Overall Research Design
        4.2.1 The a priori validation phase
        4.2.2 The a posteriori validation phase
    4.3 Research Design of the a Priori Validation Phase
        4.3.1 Research design of Stage I
            4.3.1.1 Procedure of data collection
            4.3.1.2 Research instruments
            4.3.1.3 Participants
            4.3.1.4 Data collection
            4.3.1.5 Data analysis
        4.3.2 Research design of Stage II
            4.3.2.1 Document analysis
            4.3.2.2 Initial editing of the descriptors
            4.3.2.3 Categorizing the descriptors
            4.3.2.4 Qualitative validation of the descriptors
            4.3.2.5 Calibrating the descriptors
    4.4 Research Design of the a Posteriori Validation Phase
        4.4.1 Procedure of data collection
        4.4.2 Research instruments
            4.4.2.1 Instruments used in the rating experiment
            4.4.2.2 Instrument used in the interview
        4.4.3 Participants
        4.4.4 Data collection
        4.4.5 Data analysis
            4.4.5.1 Quantitative analysis
            4.4.5.2 Qualitative analyses
    4.5 Summary
CHAPTER 5 CONSTRUCTING THE SCALE:RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    5.1 Evaluating the Existing Rating Scale
        5.1.1 Results of descriptive analysis
        5.1.2 A comparison of the raters’attitudes
    5.2 Establishing the Analytic Rating Scheme
        5.2.1 Results of the questionnaire survey
        5.2.2 Results of raters’interviews
        5.2.3 Further discussion
    5.3 Calibrating the Descriptors for CET4 W-ARS
        5.3.1 Checking the data-model fit
            5.3.1.1 The item-person map
            5.3.1.2 The reliability estimates,separation index and fitting statistics
        5.3.2 Checking functionality of the Likert scale structure
        5.3.3 Checking the unidimensionality of the rating scale
        5.3.4 Item statistics
        5.3.5 Setting cut-off points
        5.3.6 The divided levels
        5.3.7 Establishing the analytic sub-scales
    5.4 Summary
CHAPTER 6 VALIDATING THE SCALE:RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    6.1 Comparison of the Two Scales
        6.1.1 Results of the MFRM analysis
            6.1.1.1 Variable maps
            6.1.1.2 A comparison of the key statistics
    6.2 Category Functionality of CET4 W-ARS
        6.2.1 Key statistics relating to the four sub-scales
        6.2.2 Category functionality
            6.2.2.1 Statistics showing category functionality
            6.2.2.2 An exploratory analysis of rater-category interaction
        6.2.3 Summary of quantitative findings
    6.3 Raters’Perceptions of CET4 W-ARS
        6.3.1 Raters’comments on CET4 W-ARS
        6.3.2 Suggestions for further scale revision
    6.4 Further Scale Revision
        6.4.1 Refining level descriptors
        6.4.2 Rephrasing descriptors
        6.4.3 Readjusting level divisions
    6.5 A Summary of Validity Evidence
        6.5.1 Construct validity of CET4 W-ARS
        6.5.2 Reliability of CET4 W-ARS
        6.5.3 Authenticity of CET4 W-ARS
        6.5.4 Impact of CET4 W-ARS
            6.5.4.1 The scale impact at the micro level
            6.5.4.2 The scale impact at the macro level
        6.5.5 Practicality of CET4 W-ARS
    6.6 Summary
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION
    7.1 Recapitulation of the Study
    7.2 Summary of the Major Findings
    7.3 Implications of the Study
        7.3.1 Theoretical implications
        7.3.2 Methodological implications
        7.3.3 Practical implications
    7.4 Limitations of the Study
        7.4.1 Limitation of the a priori validation phase
        7.4.2 Limitations of the a posteriori phase
    7.5 Suggested Areas for Future Research
    7.6 Concluding Remarks
References
學(xué)術(shù)論文和科研成果附錄



本文編號:4012390

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/4012390.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶8b2bb***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com
亚洲丁香婷婷久久一区| 国产免费一区二区三区av大片| 亚洲天堂一区在线播放| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精另类视频 | 99视频精品免费视频| 黄色片一区二区在线观看| 日本不卡在线视频中文国产| 亚洲国产av精品一区二区| 午夜激情视频一区二区| 91福利视频日本免费看看| 亚洲一区二区三区在线免费| 厕所偷拍一区二区三区视频| 黄色国产自拍在线观看| 国产精品久久男人的天堂| 国产免费操美女逼视频| 久久天堂夜夜一本婷婷| 在线免费国产一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日本国产不卡| 亚洲一区二区精品免费视频| 最新午夜福利视频偷拍| 狠狠做深爱婷婷久久综合| 黄片免费在线观看日韩| 午夜精品在线视频一区| 亚洲欧洲成人精品香蕉网| 国产成人午夜在线视频| 日韩特级黄片免费在线观看 | 中文字幕乱码一区二区三区四区| 老司机精品视频在线免费| 欧美日韩有码一二三区| 国产免费黄片一区二区| 中文字幕人妻一区二区免费| 亚洲一区二区精品国产av| 成人精品一级特黄大片| 91播色在线免费播放| 中文字幕日韩欧美亚洲午夜| 欧美精品日韩精品一区| 五月情婷婷综合激情综合狠狠| 久一视频这里只有精品| 中文字幕精品一区二区三| 中日韩美女黄色一级片| 五月婷日韩中文字幕四虎|