調(diào)解被認為是化解矛盾沖突的重要方式之一。調(diào)解的過程異常復(fù)雜,涉及的因素眾多。因而,調(diào)解研究呈現(xiàn)出明顯的跨學(xué)科特征,吸引了包括法學(xué)、社會學(xué)、心理學(xué)、政治學(xué)與國際關(guān)系、語言學(xué)等在內(nèi)多學(xué)科學(xué)者的共同參與。不可否認的是,語言在調(diào)解活動中發(fā)揮著不可替代的作用。從語言學(xué)的視角來看,調(diào)解是一種發(fā)生在第三方調(diào)解者與當(dāng)事人之間的會話互動形式。當(dāng)前,關(guān)于調(diào)解活動中語言使用的研究主要有兩大特點:其一,在已有的研究中,英美國家的研究者居多,研究對象也多為西方式調(diào)解。相較而言,以其他國家或文化族群的調(diào)解為對象的研究并不多,針對中國本土調(diào)解類型的研究則更為稀少。其二,大部分研究的關(guān)注點主要在描述調(diào)解活動中的語言行為與互動結(jié)構(gòu)特征,及其與活動機構(gòu)屬性或社會要素之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性,但很少探究特定的文化語境對調(diào)解語言使用的影響。我們認為,調(diào)解活動不僅是一項言語活動,同時也是一種文化實踐。在調(diào)解過程中,各參與者的語言行為的產(chǎn)出與理解不但受到了特定活動類型的制約,同時也受該文化語境要素(如信念、價值觀、規(guī)約等)的驅(qū)動。本研究在文化語用學(xué)的理論框架下,基于對十個真實的調(diào)解案例進行語料分析,旨在探究中國民間調(diào)解活動的語言使用特點及文...

【文章頁數(shù)】：196 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research questions
    1.3 The database
    1.4 Organization of this dissertation
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 A general picture of mediation
        2.1.1 Definitions
        2.1.2 Distinctive features
        2.1.3 Varieties of mediation
    2.2 Linguistic approaches to mediation study
        2.2.1 Mediation in conversation analysis
        2.2.2 Mediation in pragmatics
        2.2.3 Mediation in discourse analysis
        2.2.4 Mediation in rhetoric/argumentation
    2.3 Some remarks
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Pragmatics:a functional inquiry of language use
    3.2 The cultural perspective(s)in pragmatics
        3.2.1 A critique on universalism in pragmatics
        3.2.2 Cross-cultural,intercultural,and cultural pragmatics
    3.3 Cultural pragmatics:an emic account of speech activities
        3.3.1 Speech act
        3.3.2 Activity types
        3.3.3 Cultural context
        3.3.4 An activity-based interpretive model
Chapter Four Disputants' Complaints in Chinese Folk Mediations
    4.1 Defining complaints
    4.2 Characteristics of the complaints in the folk mediation
        4.2.1 Explicit and implicit complaints
        4.2.2 Direct versus indirect complaints
    4.3 Complainee's responses
        4.3.1 Denials
        4.3.2 Counter-complaints
        4.3.3 Re-characterization of the event
    4.4 Complaints and responses:An argument for理/Li
        4.4.1 Complaints,wrongness,and moral work
        4.4.2 Argument between complaints and responses
Chapter Five Mediators' Evaluations in Chinese Folk Mediations
    5.1 Defining evaluations
    5.2 Characteristics of the evaluations in the folk mediation
        5.2.1 Explicit and implicit evaluations
        5.2.2 One-sided versus both/multi-sided evaluations
    5.3 Impartial evaluations:A judgment with理/Li
        5.3.1 Evaluation norm and理/Li
        5.3.2 Impartial evaluation and balance-seeking
Chapter Six Mediators' Directives in Chinese Folk Mediations
    6.1 Defining directives
    6.2 Characteristics of the directives in the folk mediation
        6.2.1 Syntactic forms of mediators' directives
        6.2.2 Dual dimensions of the directive content
    6.3 Disputants' responses to the directives
        6.3.1 Compliance
        6.3.2 Non-compliance
    6.4 Mediators' directives:an explication of理/Li
        6.4.1 Directives,the "right",and理/Li
        6.4.2 Deontic rights and(non-)compliance
Chapter Seven Conclusion
    7.1 Major findings
    7.2 Research significance
    7.3 Limitations and suggestions
Bibliography
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Publications



本文編號：3985159